Sidley vs. Paul Hastings vs. King & Spalding for Litigation Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
tki18
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2019 10:03 am
Sidley vs. Paul Hastings vs. King & Spalding for Litigation
All in DC. Interested in white collar and FCPA, which these 3 all seem to have good practices for, but also looking for the firm which provides the best and most substantive general litigation experience more broadly. Would like to keep the door open to be an AUSA in 5ish years.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432181
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley vs. Paul Hastings vs. King & Spalding for Litigation
King & Spaulding kinda sucks at general lit
(maybe they have better lawyers doing white collar or FCPA though, idk)
(maybe they have better lawyers doing white collar or FCPA though, idk)
