Cleary vs STB (DC) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Cleary vs STB (DC)
Interested to know more about opinions on the DC offices of these traditionally NY V10 firms. Not very interested in litigation. I know that Cleary has a big antitrust group, but I'm more interested in their FIG, securitization, sanctions, etc. work. Anyone have experience with these practices in DC and whether Cleary is a big player here? STB seems to have an unusual number of corporate/transactional associates in DC. Any opinions on what that work is like? Is it just standard NYC work being done in the swamp, or is there some actual work being originated from that office (after all, Carlyle is based in DC)? Any insights beyond Chambers regurgitation and TLS platitudes would be appreciated.
-
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cleary vs STB (DC)
Don’t have personal experience with the DC offices of either firm but Cleary DC has a far better rep than STB DC. The transactional scene in DC isn’t particularly strong; it’s a litigation town after all. I’ll let others give you more specific advice but I’ll also just mention that AFAIK Carlyle DC is largely administrative and doesn’t have much sponsor work flowing out of the officeAnonymous User wrote:Interested to know more about opinions on the DC offices of these traditionally NY V10 firms. Not very interested in litigation. I know that Cleary has a big antitrust group, but I'm more interested in their FIG, securitization, sanctions, etc. work. Anyone have experience with these practices in DC and whether Cleary is a big player here? STB seems to have an unusual number of corporate/transactional associates in DC. Any opinions on what that work is like? Is it just standard NYC work being done in the swamp, or is there some actual work being originated from that office (after all, Carlyle is based in DC)? Any insights beyond Chambers regurgitation and TLS platitudes would be appreciated.
-
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cleary vs STB (DC)
STB corporate in DC is now a big player in registered funds after a run of major lateral hires, and a lot of Carlyle work in private funds has migrated there recently (used to be exclusively done in NYC but some newer partners in DC also manage a lot of the Carlyle relationship). Those two practices have been the main growth areas for STB corporate in DC.
-
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cleary vs STB (DC)
Thanks for the info. Do you know anything about STB’s CFIUS practice? I know they advertise their capabilities out of DC for that on their website. It doesn’t look like any associates solely work on this, what are the other natural areas to work in if you’re doing international regulatory (I’m guessing competition)?Anonymous User wrote:STB corporate in DC is now a big player in registered funds after a run of major lateral hires, and a lot of Carlyle work in private funds has migrated there recently (used to be exclusively done in NYC but some newer partners in DC also manage a lot of the Carlyle relationship). Those two practices have been the main growth areas for STB corporate in DC.
-
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cleary vs STB (DC)
(Same poster as anon 1 above.) I'm afraid I don't know to that level of specificity. I'm at STB NY in private funds and definitely work with the CFIUS team in DC, including some associates, with some frequency, and there's also a significant practice in DC handling OFAC/FCPA work that connects to my practice on occasion, but otherwise I'm not as attuned to the regulatory work there. Every time I work with them, they're obviously supporting funds (or sometimes M&A) work, but that doesn't mean they don't have their own business--I just don't see it myself. Both practices are almost exclusively done in DC rather than NY if that helps.Anonymous User wrote:Thanks for the info. Do you know anything about STB’s CFIUS practice? I know they advertise their capabilities out of DC for that on their website. It doesn’t look like any associates solely work on this, what are the other natural areas to work in if you’re doing international regulatory (I’m guessing competition)?Anonymous User wrote:STB corporate in DC is now a big player in registered funds after a run of major lateral hires, and a lot of Carlyle work in private funds has migrated there recently (used to be exclusively done in NYC but some newer partners in DC also manage a lot of the Carlyle relationship). Those two practices have been the main growth areas for STB corporate in DC.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login