Which DC firm would you choose? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2019 2:03 pm
Which DC firm would you choose?
Sorting through OCI callbacks. Which of these firms would you go to, assuming you had offers from all of them? What's the dirt? General litigation goals, want to try sexy stuff like appellate/white collar but how can a 2L really know at this point? Appreciate any thoughts.
Gibson
Skadden
Ropes
Kirkland
Jones Day
Simpson
Cooley
Hogan
Quinn
All DC, but if national reputation/financial health seem relevant happy to hear that too! Thanks!
Gibson
Skadden
Ropes
Kirkland
Jones Day
Simpson
Cooley
Hogan
Quinn
All DC, but if national reputation/financial health seem relevant happy to hear that too! Thanks!
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
Stay away from Jones Day; the black box comp system is just a way for them to systematically underpay people.
NY-centric firms (i.e. Simpson) tend to have shitty DC presences -- Skadden is the exception. (But no personal knowledge of STB DC)
NY-centric firms (i.e. Simpson) tend to have shitty DC presences -- Skadden is the exception. (But no personal knowledge of STB DC)
- Elston Gunn
- Posts: 3820
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:09 pm
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
For lit, Gibson is the runaway winner here. Kirkland probably second, your feelings about culture permitting. Consider Skadden or Hogan if you’re interested in trying out regulatory work (you should be), since they’re also solid in lit. Yes, stay away from JD. The others are I’m sure totally solid places to be but are not major DC players in my experience, though I’ve been impressed at least with the lawyering ability of limited people I’ve met from Quinn.
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
Gibson is the most prestigious but also right-leaning. Quinn is also very good but they have a culture that some find off putting. As for the rest, Hogan is a DC powerhouse and Ropes is just cool. But it's really your call unless you are a fedsoc type in which case, Gibson by a mile.
-
- Posts: 593
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 11:29 pm
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
Gibson or Hogan (I think either is a defensible choice and basically peers) > the field.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Wild Card
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2014 6:48 pm
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
You should go through every callback, but schedule the best firms first and as soon as possible.
Ropes, Cooley, and Simpson are nowhere as good as the others.
Ropes, Cooley, and Simpson are nowhere as good as the others.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2019 6:15 pm
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
Mind sharing which school you’re at? Would help clear up some OCI questions on movementHIREMEPLZ wrote:Sorting through OCI callbacks. Which of these firms would you go to, assuming you had offers from all of them? What's the dirt? General litigation goals, want to try sexy stuff like appellate/white collar but how can a 2L really know at this point? Appreciate any thoughts.
Gibson
Skadden
Ropes
Kirkland
Jones Day
Simpson
Cooley
Hogan
Quinn
All DC, but if national reputation/financial health seem relevant happy to hear that too! Thanks!
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
I chose between Gibson and Kirkland -- I think those are two of the best lit shops in the city. The other firms you've named might have other specialties/services that Gibson and Kirkland do not focus as much on, but I think those two are the best on your list for pure litigation. Also the best on your list for appellate, since they have fairly strong practices with former SGs.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
Gibson or Hogan
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
I am at one of these offices and had a similar choice. Realistically, Cooley, Ropes, and STB are nowhere near the rest of that list in DC. Quinn's a bit of a wild card here and I don't know a lot about it but it's not a big DC player.
The common theme here is that Gibson's the best of your bunch; I agree. The next tier IMO would be Kirkland, Hogan, and Jones Day with Skadden a bit behind. Fortunately for you, those three firms and DC offices have noticeably different focuses and cultures, so if you miss on a Gibson offer (or decide you don't like for some reason) you'll likely end up deciding that you prefer one of those three. No one's going to be able to tell you which is best; spend half a day at each and consider doing a second look if you get multiple offers and are still stuck.
The common theme here is that Gibson's the best of your bunch; I agree. The next tier IMO would be Kirkland, Hogan, and Jones Day with Skadden a bit behind. Fortunately for you, those three firms and DC offices have noticeably different focuses and cultures, so if you miss on a Gibson offer (or decide you don't like for some reason) you'll likely end up deciding that you prefer one of those three. No one's going to be able to tell you which is best; spend half a day at each and consider doing a second look if you get multiple offers and are still stuck.
- broadstreet11
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 7:34 pm
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
Also at one of these offices. Take the callbacks and focus on culture. The DC power players (Gibson, Kirkland, Hogan, Skadden, JD) will have similar exit opps (AUSA, DOJ, etc.). QOL is really, really undervalued when going through interviews, so pick somewhere that you'll fit, not burn out, and be successful.
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2017 7:43 pm
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
Tangential question OP, but how long ago did you interview with Hogan, if you don't mind me asking? This thread made me think I might have gotten dinged lol.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2019 2:03 pm
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
Haven’t yet, just got the callback. These are all firms I’m called back at, not that I have offers for yet. Advice here usually rolls in over a few days or weeks (thank you everyone for your interesting thoughts btw!!) so I wanted to post now instead of when I’m on an offer deadline.Dubbus wrote:Tangential question OP, but how long ago did you interview with Hogan, if you don't mind me asking? This thread made me think I might have gotten dinged lol.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2017 7:43 pm
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
Sorry for being unclear, I meant when was your screener interview.HIREMEPLZ wrote:Haven’t yet, just got the callback. These are all firms I’m called back at, not that I have offers for yet. Advice here usually rolls in over a few days or weeks (thank you everyone for your interesting thoughts btw!!) so I wanted to post now instead of when I’m on an offer deadline.Dubbus wrote:Tangential question OP, but how long ago did you interview with Hogan, if you don't mind me asking? This thread made me think I might have gotten dinged lol.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2019 2:03 pm
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
Oh gotcha gotcha. It was last week.Dubbus wrote:Sorry for being unclear, I meant when was your screener interview.HIREMEPLZ wrote:Haven’t yet, just got the callback. These are all firms I’m called back at, not that I have offers for yet. Advice here usually rolls in over a few days or weeks (thank you everyone for your interesting thoughts btw!!) so I wanted to post now instead of when I’m on an offer deadline.Dubbus wrote:Tangential question OP, but how long ago did you interview with Hogan, if you don't mind me asking? This thread made me think I might have gotten dinged lol.
-
- Posts: 396
- Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 12:06 am
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
I think Hogan is kind of an underrated choice here (not saying it should certainly be your top choice). Obviously not as good as GDC for pure lit or white collar, but has great regulatory practices and seems to be one of the more humane shops to work at (though YMMV depending on group). Friendly culture too. Also an old-school DC firm, and that still means something.
ETA: btw no Covington? Kinda surprised they didn't offer a CB given everything else you got.
ETA: btw no Covington? Kinda surprised they didn't offer a CB given everything else you got.
-
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 8:57 am
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
yes to this. On average your QOL will be way higher at hogan then Gibson or KirklandBlackAndOrange84 wrote:I think Hogan is kind of an underrated choice here (not saying it should certainly be your top choice). Obviously not as good as GDC for pure lit or white collar, but has great regulatory practices and seems to be one of the more humane shops to work at (though YMMV depending on group). Friendly culture too. Also an old-school DC firm, and that still means something.
ETA: btw no Covington? Kinda surprised they didn't offer a CB given everything else you got.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2019 9:05 am
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
On QoL, I have heard extremely good things about Cooley in DC for their transactional practice, especially the startup group.
I heard a lot of Jones “Days and Nights,” more than usual even by biglaw standards.
For pure litigation, out of list, it’s probably still Quinn then Gibson then the clump around huge DC offices like Hogan.
You should be asking about practice groups you will likely be staffed on and trying to get a feel for your likely bosses. Those factors have much stronger influence on your life than firm prestige and overall firm culture.
I heard a lot of Jones “Days and Nights,” more than usual even by biglaw standards.
For pure litigation, out of list, it’s probably still Quinn then Gibson then the clump around huge DC offices like Hogan.
You should be asking about practice groups you will likely be staffed on and trying to get a feel for your likely bosses. Those factors have much stronger influence on your life than firm prestige and overall firm culture.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2019 2:03 pm
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
Right?! Me too. I thought things went well with them on campus and everything. Who knows...BlackAndOrange84 wrote:ETA: btw no Covington? Kinda surprised they didn't offer a CB given everything else you got.
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
Fit and “prestige” aside, I agree with the Quinn point - I’ve seen them massacre K&E and GDC in litigation.notinbiglaw wrote:On QoL, I have heard extremely good things about Cooley in DC for their transactional practice, especially the startup group.
I heard a lot of Jones “Days and Nights,” more than usual even by biglaw standards.
For pure litigation, out of list, it’s probably still Quinn then Gibson then the clump around huge DC offices like Hogan.
You should be asking about practice groups you will likely be staffed on and trying to get a feel for your likely bosses. Those factors have much stronger influence on your life than firm prestige and overall firm culture.
But I think most important to the original poster - these firms are all very different fit wise. They are all great (but I think STB, Ropes, and Skadden aren’t big DC players) so perhaps do second looks and see where you can see yourself being the happiest.
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
A small bit of pushback here is that OP probably needs to think about what he/she/ze wants to do before picking a firm based on QOL.
I'm in lit, and have also heard that these mysterious "regulatory" practices are nice to work for. That said, if OP were to want to litigate, then I would write off all of OP's choices but Gibson, Kirkland, and Quinn pretty quickly. It's easy to learn a lot at those places and then lateral down somewhere with maybe-better QOL if needed.
If OP wants regulatory or some other practice, then that changes the calculus obviously.
I'm in lit, and have also heard that these mysterious "regulatory" practices are nice to work for. That said, if OP were to want to litigate, then I would write off all of OP's choices but Gibson, Kirkland, and Quinn pretty quickly. It's easy to learn a lot at those places and then lateral down somewhere with maybe-better QOL if needed.
If OP wants regulatory or some other practice, then that changes the calculus obviously.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
Showing some bias here, but Gibson and it’s not close. The QOL at Gibson DC is markedly better than is being implied here. Sure, you’ll have your late nights and weekend projects, but it’s not a regular occurrence and the face-time expectations are pretty relaxed. The work is great, the partners are nice (I’ve never had a negative interaction), and the culture is pleasant.
I can’t say I’ve heard the same about some of those others, especially Kirkland.
I can’t say I’ve heard the same about some of those others, especially Kirkland.
- beepboopbeep
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:36 pm
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
Some weird anon-ing in this thread, other than the last one. That said, agree with this:
And if you are checking off ropes/cooley/stb from the outset, as people have suggested, then just go on all the remaining callbacks. You can squeeze 6 into a week or less fairly easily.
I also had "general litigation goals" going into 2L summer. Managed to end up summering at a DC shop (not among those listed) that did a lot more regulatory, and regulatory within a specific sub-area of the law, than I thought. That was probably determinable in advance. You can look at firm websites and associate/partner bios and to some degree figure out what work is actually happening in a particular office. You can also glean a lot of this from going on the CBs. What's the breakdown of your practice, what do you perceive as the breakdown of available work originating in this office, how often do you work on cases with partners from other offices, etc.A small bit of pushback here is that OP probably needs to think about what he/she/ze wants to do before picking a firm based on QOL.
And if you are checking off ropes/cooley/stb from the outset, as people have suggested, then just go on all the remaining callbacks. You can squeeze 6 into a week or less fairly easily.
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
FWIW my experience at Kirkland DC is not like what you have apparently heard. K&E definitely has lower face-time expectations than you might find elsewhere. It’s not a firm you think of for QoL/hours reasons, but then again the median or average (I forget) K&E associate hours last year was 1950ish, and I’m confident the DC office is below average firmwide.Anonymous User wrote:Showing some bias here, but Gibson and it’s not close. The QOL at Gibson DC is markedly better than is being implied here. Sure, you’ll have your late nights and weekend projects, but it’s not a regular occurrence and the face-time expectations are pretty relaxed. The work is great, the partners are nice (I’ve never had a negative interaction), and the culture is pleasant.
I can’t say I’ve heard the same about some of those others, especially Kirkland.
Also I think all the big lit shops do mostly the same kind of work. Generally speaking the partners are good to work with as well. There are nights and weekends where you’ll work. You will find those at any biglaw firm.
I have a close friend at GDC and I have only heard good things subject to the usual biglaw gripes. It’s probably the most prestigious office on OP’s list in terms of litigating in DC too. But I would also be generally positive about KE in DC which is very similar to GDC in work, perception (generally although GDC will be shinier to those in the know), and associate expectations as far as I know. I think KE NY is a different animal entirely, though.
-
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Which DC firm would you choose?
Covington
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login