Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432509
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
As economists have been talking about an impending recession for quite some time, which firm do you think is the safer choice between Jones Day, Latham, and Kirkland (I have offers from all 3)? Jones Day loves to tell applicants about how they didn't fire anyone during the last recession. Is that actually true? Also, do you think Latham and Kirkland would have massive layoffs again?
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 5:55 pm
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
I honestly don’t know if there’s really going to be an impending recession and I haven’t really heard anything from economists about it. I wouldn’t pick Jones Day just because they’ve had a lot of issues recently. FWIW: I’d personally pick Latham over Kirkland.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2019 12:39 am
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
Kirkland 100%. If not just for data points on how Latham acted in prior recessionary periods (2x). PE shops to some extent still try to do deals during more turbulent economic periods and maybe try to refi their acquisitions when debt markets improve. Nothing would be guaranteed but I would trust Kirkland over the other 2.
- Mullens
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:34 am
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
Considering the verb “Lathaming” was invented in the last recession, I’d be careful with Latham.
- BansheeScream
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2017 11:46 am
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
This completely depends on the market and what practice group you want. Kirkland has the best comp. JD has the worst comp. JD would probably only make sense if you're in the midwest somewhere outside of Chicago or DC.
Last edited by QContinuum on Fri Aug 02, 2019 5:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Outed for anon abuse.
Reason: Outed for anon abuse.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2016 8:27 pm
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
This is a really weird basis for you to choose a firm on. There are infinitely better reasons to choose one firm over another than this
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:15 am
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
Agree, this is a terrible, horrible reason to choose one firm over another. K&E and Latham are both likely to trim ranks in the event of a major economic downturn (as will most AmLaw 100 firms). Make your pick based on the strength of the practice group and how you like interacting with the members of that group (both senior partners and associates). If you are judging based off pure compensation, avoid JD.JusticeChuckleNutz wrote:This is a really weird basis for you to choose a firm on. There are infinitely better reasons to choose one firm over another than this
-
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:41 am
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
Dont think this is a terrible idea.. at all. Getting laid off as a junior may have a catastrophic impact on your career, from which you may never recover. This should def be part of consideration. Do you have any other options? Id just be wary of latham and ke (ina recession) and jd is meh.
- rahulg91
- Posts: 427
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 1:30 pm
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
It’s a bad idea because of how wildly it varies. If OP is down for restructuring, then KE is clearly the superior choice, probably the same goes for litigation. Will M&A survive a recession or will corporate juniors be culled first? If that’s the case there’s no meaningful distinction between KE and Latham.spyke123 wrote:Dont think this is a terrible idea.. at all. Getting laid off as a junior may have a catastrophic impact on your career, from which you may never recover. This should def be part of consideration. Do you have any other options? Id just be wary of latham and ke (ina recession) and jd is meh.
KE has a slight edge here probably because PE firms are better able to weather economic downturns, but that’s pure speculation on my part. So I guess if you want to do restructuring work, go KE. Otherwise, with these three firms as your options, there’s no appreciable difference between KE and Latham. Obviously JD should be disqualified for anyone with real options, given the below-market compensation and lack of transparency wrt pay and associate performance.
-
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:42 am
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
If there is a recession as bad as the last one, I’m not sure where you will be safe. Maybe Cravath? It’s a bad reason to be choosing a firm, as others have said.
- Elston Gunn
- Posts: 3820
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:09 pm
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
Based both on their actions during the recession and what I’ve heard anecdotally about how soon and aggressively they push out associates, there seems a clear pattern that Latham cares less about the careers of its associates than the average big firm. I don’t know why people don’t avoid Latham more aggressively.
I do kind of doubt KE is going to be all that protective of young associates given their aggressiveness in chasing profits, but at least you’ll probably get above market bonuses. JD you want to avoid for other reasons.
Not sure how you ended up with these three options but I guess KE if you have to pick.
I do kind of doubt KE is going to be all that protective of young associates given their aggressiveness in chasing profits, but at least you’ll probably get above market bonuses. JD you want to avoid for other reasons.
Not sure how you ended up with these three options but I guess KE if you have to pick.
-
- Posts: 432509
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
Considering that Skadden and Paul Weiss have no offered several summers in NY this year, I think this is a fair concern. In my opinion, these are all pretty horrible choices if you're concerned about a recession. I say just go with your gut. Kirkland and Latham are large and have been very aggressive recently, and I think are more likely to shed associates in the next downturn compared to their peer firms. I immediately write off JD in most situations so would just pick among Latham or Kirkland. You can't really hedge for this. Firms may have already adjusted their offers this cycle in anticipation of a downturn anyway, so just go with what you would choose in normal circumstances.
-
- Posts: 432509
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
A lot of factors to consider in choosing a firm and agree that likelihood of layoff is not a particularly compelling factor / consideration, but just wanted to note that, if you’re interested in restructuring, I wouldn’t say that Kirkland is “clearly the superior choice.” Jones Day has an established solid practice and Latham’s group is on fire with the new laterals they’ve brought in.rahulg91 wrote:It’s a bad idea because of how wildly it varies. If OP is down for restructuring, then KE is clearly the superior choice, probably the same goes for litigation. Will M&A survive a recession or will corporate juniors be culled first? If that’s the case there’s no meaningful distinction between KE and Latham.spyke123 wrote:Dont think this is a terrible idea.. at all. Getting laid off as a junior may have a catastrophic impact on your career, from which you may never recover. This should def be part of consideration. Do you have any other options? Id just be wary of latham and ke (ina recession) and jd is meh.
KE has a slight edge here probably because PE firms are better able to weather economic downturns, but that’s pure speculation on my part. So I guess if you want to do restructuring work, go KE. Otherwise, with these three firms as your options, there’s no appreciable difference between KE and Latham. Obviously JD should be disqualified for anyone with real options, given the below-market compensation and lack of transparency wrt pay and associate performance.
Would go with Jones Day if you’re interested in some niche office only they have, otherwise Latham. Don’t see how Kirkland’s insane hiring spree is going to work out in a downturn fwiw.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 305
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:43 pm
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
Think Craveth is TCR here.Npret wrote:If there is a recession as bad as the last one, I’m not sure where you will be safe. Maybe Cravath? It’s a bad reason to be choosing a firm, as others have said.
- UnfrozenCaveman
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:06 pm
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
But what will you do when you can't get money out of the bank?
-
- Posts: 432509
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
Do you have more color on the Skadden/PW thing? Relevant to me.Anonymous User wrote:Considering that Skadden and Paul Weiss have no offered several summers in NY this year, I think this is a fair concern. In my opinion, these are all pretty horrible choices if you're concerned about a recession. I say just go with your gut. Kirkland and Latham are large and have been very aggressive recently, and I think are more likely to shed associates in the next downturn compared to their peer firms. I immediately write off JD in most situations so would just pick among Latham or Kirkland. You can't really hedge for this. Firms may have already adjusted their offers this cycle in anticipation of a downturn anyway, so just go with what you would choose in normal circumstances.
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2018 2:10 pm
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
Bank? I got it all in my BTC/ETH wallet.UnfrozenCaveman wrote:But what will you do when you can't get money out of the bank?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:15 am
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
Can't agree with you there. Weil/Kirkland are miles ahead of the competition then it comes to debtor-side representation. If you're looking for high-level restructuring work, KE/Weil are clearly the top choices, everything else is pretty far behind.Anonymous User wrote:A lot of factors to consider in choosing a firm and agree that likelihood of layoff is not a particularly compelling factor / consideration, but just wanted to note that, if you’re interested in restructuring, I wouldn’t say that Kirkland is “clearly the superior choice.” Jones Day has an established solid practice and Latham’s group is on fire with the new laterals they’ve brought in.rahulg91 wrote:It’s a bad idea because of how wildly it varies. If OP is down for restructuring, then KE is clearly the superior choice, probably the same goes for litigation. Will M&A survive a recession or will corporate juniors be culled first? If that’s the case there’s no meaningful distinction between KE and Latham.spyke123 wrote:Dont think this is a terrible idea.. at all. Getting laid off as a junior may have a catastrophic impact on your career, from which you may never recover. This should def be part of consideration. Do you have any other options? Id just be wary of latham and ke (ina recession) and jd is meh.
KE has a slight edge here probably because PE firms are better able to weather economic downturns, but that’s pure speculation on my part. So I guess if you want to do restructuring work, go KE. Otherwise, with these three firms as your options, there’s no appreciable difference between KE and Latham. Obviously JD should be disqualified for anyone with real options, given the below-market compensation and lack of transparency wrt pay and associate performance.
Would go with Jones Day if you’re interested in some niche office only they have, otherwise Latham. Don’t see how Kirkland’s insane hiring spree is going to work out in a downturn fwiw.
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 10:45 pm
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
I actually think JD might not be a bad idea, because it does mostly litigation, and that seems like a relatively recession-friendly practice.
-
- Posts: 432509
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
I don’t disagree that Weil/KE are the best but, as someone working in the area (that has worked at Weil/KE), the others are solid choices too, though I dislike JD’s group.OneTwoThreeFour wrote:Can't agree with you there. Weil/Kirkland are miles ahead of the competition then it comes to debtor-side representation. If you're looking for high-level restructuring work, KE/Weil are clearly the top choices, everything else is pretty far behind.Anonymous User wrote:A lot of factors to consider in choosing a firm and agree that likelihood of layoff is not a particularly compelling factor / consideration, but just wanted to note that, if you’re interested in restructuring, I wouldn’t say that Kirkland is “clearly the superior choice.” Jones Day has an established solid practice and Latham’s group is on fire with the new laterals they’ve brought in.rahulg91 wrote:It’s a bad idea because of how wildly it varies. If OP is down for restructuring, then KE is clearly the superior choice, probably the same goes for litigation. Will M&A survive a recession or will corporate juniors be culled first? If that’s the case there’s no meaningful distinction between KE and Latham.spyke123 wrote:Dont think this is a terrible idea.. at all. Getting laid off as a junior may have a catastrophic impact on your career, from which you may never recover. This should def be part of consideration. Do you have any other options? Id just be wary of latham and ke (ina recession) and jd is meh.
KE has a slight edge here probably because PE firms are better able to weather economic downturns, but that’s pure speculation on my part. So I guess if you want to do restructuring work, go KE. Otherwise, with these three firms as your options, there’s no appreciable difference between KE and Latham. Obviously JD should be disqualified for anyone with real options, given the below-market compensation and lack of transparency wrt pay and associate performance.
Would go with Jones Day if you’re interested in some niche office only they have, otherwise Latham. Don’t see how Kirkland’s insane hiring spree is going to work out in a downturn fwiw.
-
- Posts: 432509
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
OP here. I also have offers at MoFo and Cooley. However, I have essentially eliminated both firms from consideration since I didn't particularly care for the people I met.
Market is CA (don't want to be more specific than that). For Jones Day and Kirkland, I would be joining the litigation practice group. For Latham, I'm interested in taking advantage of the unassigned program and exploring both the environment, land, and resources practice group as well as the litigation group. Does that change any of your opinions?
Market is CA (don't want to be more specific than that). For Jones Day and Kirkland, I would be joining the litigation practice group. For Latham, I'm interested in taking advantage of the unassigned program and exploring both the environment, land, and resources practice group as well as the litigation group. Does that change any of your opinions?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432509
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
This. I'm at Latham and it's not the type of place that would let juniors chill in a recession (even less so than other biglaw firms). We push out juniors even when we are busy.Elston Gunn wrote:Based both on their actions during the recession and what I’ve heard anecdotally about how soon and aggressively they push out associates, there seems a clear pattern that Latham cares less about the careers of its associates than the average big firm. I don’t know why people don’t avoid Latham more aggressively.
- Yugihoe
- Posts: 691
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 4:25 pm
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
What do you mean juniors get pushed out even when you're busy? You mean for poor performance?Anonymous User wrote:This. I'm at Latham and it's not the type of place that would let juniors chill in a recession (even less so than other biglaw firms). We push out juniors even when we are busy.Elston Gunn wrote:Based both on their actions during the recession and what I’ve heard anecdotally about how soon and aggressively they push out associates, there seems a clear pattern that Latham cares less about the careers of its associates than the average big firm. I don’t know why people don’t avoid Latham more aggressively.
-
- Posts: 432509
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
This is pretty scare to read. Are there other firms who have similar reputations (ideally rooted in facts older associates can attest to)? Should I lean towards a more established V10 than lower in the rankings, or stay away from litigation boutiques, given that there's a recession coming? (Assuming I have that option obviously).Anonymous User wrote:This. I'm at Latham and it's not the type of place that would let juniors chill in a recession (even less so than other biglaw firms). We push out juniors even when we are busy.Elston Gunn wrote:Based both on their actions during the recession and what I’ve heard anecdotally about how soon and aggressively they push out associates, there seems a clear pattern that Latham cares less about the careers of its associates than the average big firm. I don’t know why people don’t avoid Latham more aggressively.
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:15 am
Re: Jones Day, Latham, or Kirkland in a Recession
Yeah, what the hell? Like second or third years are getting shitcanned even when they are putting up hours? Why?Yugihoe wrote:What do you mean juniors get pushed out even when you're busy? You mean for poor performance?Anonymous User wrote:This. I'm at Latham and it's not the type of place that would let juniors chill in a recession (even less so than other biglaw firms). We push out juniors even when we are busy.Elston Gunn wrote:Based both on their actions during the recession and what I’ve heard anecdotally about how soon and aggressively they push out associates, there seems a clear pattern that Latham cares less about the careers of its associates than the average big firm. I don’t know why people don’t avoid Latham more aggressively.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login