Billing for thinking Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
objctnyrhnr

Moderator
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:44 am

Billing for thinking

Post by objctnyrhnr » Sun Feb 03, 2019 12:34 am

By the time you get to mid level biglaw, it’s likely that you’ve accepted and perhaps endorsed the notion of your job eating into your life. So, to those people, do you ever feel compelled to somehow get compensated for your thoughts that doesn’t necessarily translate into written work product or delivearables? For example, if I take a shower and I find myself idly thinking about how I might frame the last bit of a litigation argument in an active case for a dispositive motion for a big client...and I subsequently act on that argument and it becomes a big thing...do I deserve to bill for a portion of that time I spent showering? I don’t know the answer (and I haven’t yet billed for something like this), but I am wondering if others have come across it.

AZ123

New
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 10:08 pm

Re: Billing for thinking

Post by AZ123 » Sun Feb 03, 2019 12:55 am

I don't bill for random thoughts during the day like that, but if I have to take three minutes to think about an issue while I'm drafting something I obviously bill that.

I figure the random moments I think about the case when I'm not working makes up for some of the moments my mind drifts while I am actually working haha.

objctnyrhnr

Moderator
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:44 am

Re: Billing for thinking

Post by objctnyrhnr » Sun Feb 03, 2019 12:58 am

AZ123 wrote:I don't bill for random thoughts during the day like that, but if I have to take three minutes to think about an issue while I'm drafting something I obviously bill that.

I figure the random moments I think about the case when I'm not working makes up for some of the moments my mind drifts while I am actually working haha.
That’s fair—so you see those moments as theoretically billable, but also making up for hours you also happen to bill where there’s nothing of substance that occurs? I get that.

QContinuum

Moderator
Posts: 3594
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2017 9:52 am

Re: Billing for thinking

Post by QContinuum » Sun Feb 03, 2019 1:17 am

AZ123 wrote:I don't bill for random thoughts during the day like that, but if I have to take three minutes to think about an issue while I'm drafting something I obviously bill that.

I figure the random moments I think about the case when I'm not working makes up for some of the moments my mind drifts while I am actually working haha.
My approach in a nutshell. I think it's fairer to the client that way, and also I just can't be bothered to keep track of all of my random thoughts for billing purposes.

AZ123

New
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 10:08 pm

Re: Billing for thinking

Post by AZ123 » Sun Feb 03, 2019 8:24 pm

objctnyrhnr wrote:
AZ123 wrote:I don't bill for random thoughts during the day like that, but if I have to take three minutes to think about an issue while I'm drafting something I obviously bill that.

I figure the random moments I think about the case when I'm not working makes up for some of the moments my mind drifts while I am actually working haha.
That’s fair—so you see those moments as theoretically billable, but also making up for hours you also happen to bill where there’s nothing of substance that occurs? I get that.
No, I don't really see those moments as theoretically billable. I was mostly saying that if they were billable, they would be offset by the moments I temporarily lose focus during my regular billing. I can't imagine submitting a bill to a client with ".1 thinking about case" haha.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


objctnyrhnr

Moderator
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 2:44 am

Re: Billing for thinking

Post by objctnyrhnr » Sun Feb 03, 2019 9:03 pm

AZ123 wrote:
objctnyrhnr wrote:
AZ123 wrote:I don't bill for random thoughts during the day like that, but if I have to take three minutes to think about an issue while I'm drafting something I obviously bill that.

I figure the random moments I think about the case when I'm not working makes up for some of the moments my mind drifts while I am actually working haha.
That’s fair—so you see those moments as theoretically billable, but also making up for hours you also happen to bill where there’s nothing of substance that occurs? I get that.
No, I don't really see those moments as theoretically billable. I was mostly saying that if they were billable, they would be offset by the moments I temporarily lose focus during my regular billing. I can't imagine submitting a bill to a client with ".1 thinking about case" haha.
I mean in this scenario, I think you’d probably throw a word like “strategize” “analyze” or “evaluate” in there. Not saying it’s somwtning I have done or would do...but if I did, that’s how I’d do it.

20181989

New
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 6:28 pm

Re: Billing for thinking

Post by 20181989 » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:28 pm

I totally feel this question. Basically every time I go running, I'm pacing through my case task lists in my head for >50% of the time. But I don't bill that - instead, I give myself a little slack when I do have Word/Westlaw open. It tends to all come out in the wash.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”