Latham (DC) v Sidley (DC) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Latham (DC) v Sidley (DC)
Generally interested in commercial litigation (no interest in white collar work) also would like to explore regulatory. Any insight greatly appreciated.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Latham (DC) v Sidley (DC)
Bump. Lots of votes for Sidley. Anyone care to explain their reasoning?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Latham (DC) v Sidley (DC)
Don’t know a ton about these two firms (DC associate at a different firm), but my impression is that Sidley has a broader, much more DC-style practice, particularly in their regulatory groups (which you’ve said you want to explore). That may be the reason.
