Wachtell v. Quinn Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432799
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Wachtell v. Quinn
Thoughts for lit and AUSA goals?
-
Wild Card
- Posts: 1015
- Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2014 6:48 pm
Re: Wachtell v. Quinn
As of December 2016, at the SDNY, 6 AUSAs came from WLRK and 5 from Quinn. In General Crimes and Narcotics (i.e., among first- and second-year AUSAs), 1 came from WLRK and 2 from Quinn.
In other words, both are feeding healthily into the SDNY. So you should go to WLRK, because they will pay you twice as much as Quinn, they are significantly more selective than Quinn, and your exit options accordingly will be significantly better.
In other words, both are feeding healthily into the SDNY. So you should go to WLRK, because they will pay you twice as much as Quinn, they are significantly more selective than Quinn, and your exit options accordingly will be significantly better.
