what is "big law" for salary purposes Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
rbfplacid

- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 6:49 pm
what is "big law" for salary purposes
I'm a recent graduate from tier 2 law school. I recently got an offer at a 800+ lawyer firm in NYC (no international offices), but the salary is significantly lower than the new big law standard. Glassdoor says average associate salary is in low 100s. Is this unusual? I hope this is also an encouraging story for those out there struggling with their job search. There is hope.
-
QContinuum

- Posts: 3594
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2017 9:52 am
Re: what is "big law" for salary purposes
First off, congrats on your offer! Not easy to land from a Tier 2 school - you must've killed it grades-wise and/or done a lot of hustling. Kudos on your hard work and success.
I don't think there's a single precise definition of "BigLaw." But I think the main "metrics," so to speak, are salary and "prestige," not sheer size. For example, insurance defense firms and plaintiff firms are not generally considered BigLaw no matter how many lawyers they have. On the flip side, plenty of litigation boutiques are considered BigLaw, even though they may be very small.
I don't think there's a single precise definition of "BigLaw." But I think the main "metrics," so to speak, are salary and "prestige," not sheer size. For example, insurance defense firms and plaintiff firms are not generally considered BigLaw no matter how many lawyers they have. On the flip side, plenty of litigation boutiques are considered BigLaw, even though they may be very small.
-
rbfplacid

- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 6:49 pm
Re: what is "big law" for salary purposes
Thanks for your reply. It is in toxic tort litigation, so I guess it is not as glamorous as some other fields. From your explanation, I believe that is why the salary is lower. I actually didn't have very good grades. I applied blindly on indeed, but I had experience in the field. Since its a smaller field I believe its more common for everyone to know each other. I worked at a similar firm (though much smaller) the previous summer. I think that was the most helpful part. I don't really care that much about the salary. I just wanted to make sure it wasn't really unfair.
-
JohnnieSockran

- Posts: 251
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2018 1:07 pm
Re: what is "big law" for salary purposes
Salary scale starting at or around $190k for a first year associate is generally biglaw (at least for NYC).
Some of the boutiques referred to by the poster above pay this scale or even higher, which is why size is not indicative of biglaw.
Some of the boutiques referred to by the poster above pay this scale or even higher, which is why size is not indicative of biglaw.
- nealric

- Posts: 4397
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: what is "big law" for salary purposes
I think we should send your inquiry to the official biglaw certification board for a thorough review and examination
When most people talk about biglaw, they are usually talking about full-service firms in the Amlaw 100 (or at least 250) that pay "market" salary to associates or at least somewhere in the ballpark of what the current market salary is. It doesn't sound like the firm you are looking to join is what most people mean when they refer to biglaw, but I wouldn't get too hung up on definitions. It's a colloquial shorthand term anyways.
When most people talk about biglaw, they are usually talking about full-service firms in the Amlaw 100 (or at least 250) that pay "market" salary to associates or at least somewhere in the ballpark of what the current market salary is. It doesn't sound like the firm you are looking to join is what most people mean when they refer to biglaw, but I wouldn't get too hung up on definitions. It's a colloquial shorthand term anyways.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
rbfplacid

- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 6:49 pm
Re: what is "big law" for salary purposes
Good suggestion. I will file a formal inquiry to the big law board. 
- smokeylarue

- Posts: 611
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:55 pm
Re: what is "big law" for salary purposes
Generally people refer to it as the national law firms that largely start their associates at 180-190k in major markets. Have to include the elite boutique shops too. Some would probably include those regional biglaw/midlaw shops in the AmLaw 100 to 200ish range that no one here ever talks about but also pay pretty close to the national firms.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432799
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: what is "big law" for salary purposes
No matter how many attorneys they have, Low 100s isn’t in the BL league. Especially in a high COL city. To answer your question on the LOW side, mid-170s.