Deleted Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432799
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
legalpotato

- Posts: 219
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 3:00 pm
Re: Cravath v. Skadden v. Gibson Dunn v. Paul Weiss
Back in my day trolling used to mean something.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432799
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath v. Skadden v. Gibson Dunn v. Paul Weiss
Not OP but this seems like pretty...typical TLS?legalpotato wrote:Back in my day trolling used to mean something.
@ OP -- I'd probably be focusing on CSM and Skadden. Potentially dispositive question here: how do you feel about the rotation system, like gut level?
- 4LTsPointingNorth

- Posts: 253
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:17 am
Re: Cravath v. Skadden v. Gibson Dunn v. Paul Weiss
If you feel good vibes from Skadden and want to do that kind of work, go to Skadden
- PeanutsNJam

- Posts: 4670
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm
Re: Cravath v. Skadden v. Gibson Dunn v. Paul Weiss
No reason to pick skadden over Cravath, and the other 2 aren’t known for their Corp work.
Skadden has thousands of lawyers, the odds of you working with the few who gave you “good vibes” are low. Odds of getting shitty/great co workers/teams is about the same at either firm.
Skadden has thousands of lawyers, the odds of you working with the few who gave you “good vibes” are low. Odds of getting shitty/great co workers/teams is about the same at either firm.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432799
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath v. Skadden v. Gibson Dunn v. Paul Weiss
Just my opinion, so I'm sure others will disagree, but I'd take Cravath if nothing else just for its name. The corporate attorneys there get top notch training, and even if you can't hack it or hate it after only 2 years, you can certainly go to pretty much any other firm at that point.
There are far more Skadden-trained lawyers than there are Cravath-trained lawyers.
There are far more Skadden-trained lawyers than there are Cravath-trained lawyers.
-
legalpotato

- Posts: 219
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 3:00 pm
Re: Cravath v. Skadden v. Gibson Dunn v. Paul Weiss
Maybe if OP had some more specific criteria, but considering that OP's criteria is simply "which firm would be best for someone interested in corporate work (M&A, private equity, finance, capital markets, investment funds) in NYC," it is sounds like low-level trolling. Either that or OP is an idiot savant.Anonymous User wrote:Not OP but this seems like pretty...typical TLS?legalpotato wrote:Back in my day trolling used to mean something.
@ OP -- I'd probably be focusing on CSM and Skadden. Potentially dispositive question here: how do you feel about the rotation system, like gut level?
- 4LTsPointingNorth

- Posts: 253
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:17 am
Re: Cravath v. Skadden v. Gibson Dunn v. Paul Weiss
That's a bit too unforgiving of an analysis. Early August is prime rising 2L recruiting season. It's more likely the OP is being intentionally vague, perhaps without realizing the potential detriment to their likelihood of receiving more precise advice.legalpotato wrote:Maybe if OP had some more specific criteria, but considering that OP's criteria is simply "which firm would be best for someone interested in corporate work (M&A, private equity, finance, capital markets, investment funds) in NYC," it is sounds like low-level trolling. Either that or OP is an idiot savant.Anonymous User wrote:Not OP but this seems like pretty...typical TLS?legalpotato wrote:Back in my day trolling used to mean something.
@ OP -- I'd probably be focusing on CSM and Skadden. Potentially dispositive question here: how do you feel about the rotation system, like gut level?
-
dabigchina

- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:22 am
Re: Cravath v. Skadden v. Gibson Dunn v. Paul Weiss
Like everyone said, skadden and cravath have the best corporate service lines. Go with whichever one you like better, keeping in mind cravaths rotation system.