Employment Boutique vs Biglaw Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432622
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Employment Boutique vs Biglaw
Hi all,
I’m jus wondering what TLS thinks about employment boutiques, e.g. Littler, Ogletree, etc.vs. traditional biglaw. Any pros/cons to going to one over the other besides the obvious that the boutiques normally don’t pay market? Thanks!
I’m jus wondering what TLS thinks about employment boutiques, e.g. Littler, Ogletree, etc.vs. traditional biglaw. Any pros/cons to going to one over the other besides the obvious that the boutiques normally don’t pay market? Thanks!
- Toni V
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:42 am
Re: Employment Boutique vs Biglaw
If you have a shot at BL, take it over a boutique. Aside from $$, the biggest advantage is the option to lateral. If it turned out you did not like the boutique firm you might yourself “stuck.” Much easier to change course from a BL firm.
-
- Posts: 432622
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Employment Boutique vs Biglaw
The above is generally true, but I my firm has many Littler laterals. I think Littler is probably the “best” out of the labor and employment-only firms.
-
- Posts: 432622
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Employment Boutique vs Biglaw
I worked at a national L&E “botique.” Definitely go biglaw if you can. The L&E firms provide much more substantive experience, but the pay is well below market and the hours are comparable to traditional biglaw firms... especially at Littler. People that left my firm usually lateralled into other L&E boqitues, biglaw firms, or in-house L&E spots.
-
- Posts: 432622
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Employment Boutique vs Biglaw
Agree with the above, go biglaw over Boutique. Littler and Jackson Lewis pay well below market.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432622
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Employment Boutique vs Biglaw
Thanks, all. Any more thoughts? I've heard that you might be forced to cut your own hours due to higher billing rate in Biglaw. Any truth to that?
-
- Posts: 432622
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Employment Boutique vs Biglaw
My national employment boutique also cut my hours. Employment boutiques take a TON of EPLI (employment practices liability insurance) work. These insurance companies cut hours like crazy. FYI, when speaking of these big employment boutique, the main ones I know of are:Anonymous User wrote:Thanks, all. Any more thoughts? I've heard that you might be forced to cut your own hours due to higher billing rate in Biglaw. Any truth to that?
Littler
Fisher Phillips
Jackson Lewis
Ford Harrison
Ogletree
-
- Posts: 432622
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Employment Boutique vs Biglaw
Not true in my experience at big law firm known for employment practice. (One of Morgan Lewis, jones day, Proskauer). There are definitely cases that we won’t get cause of higher rates, but once it’s in the door I’ve never had an issue with hours getting cut.Anonymous User wrote:Thanks, all. Any more thoughts? I've heard that you might be forced to cut your own hours due to higher billing rate in Biglaw. Any truth to that?