I'm really interested in moving in-house or going to a boutique firm.
When is too early to leave the firm?
I generally hear 3-5 years because of training and credential reasons. But curious if any others can discuss whether leaving earlier would severely shortchange your career and how you know.
In-house -- when is leaving the firm too early? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432622
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
nealric
- Posts: 4394
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: In-house -- when is leaving the firm too early?
I don't think there's really a "too early" for in-house, but the best positions tend to require at least 3-5 years of firm experience. It may also depend on where you are with your firm. If you are getting great training/experience, it may be worth holding on a little longer. Boutiques are a different game, but it's going to be entirely dependent on the specific boutique and your practice area. Make sure you understand the business model and financial situation of any small firm you join.
