Clerkships & "Law Firm" Experience Requriements Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Barrred

Bronze
Posts: 277
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 6:49 pm

Clerkships & "Law Firm" Experience Requriements

Post by Barrred » Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:41 pm

Within biglaw it is understood that years spent clerking prior to joining the firm constitute relevant experience for purposes of determining class year, but does this same understanding apply to non-biglaw jobs? (E.g., government jobs, in-house positions, or even positions in small boutique firms).

For instance, if a job posting requires "3-4 years experience at a large law firm," and one has 2 years experience as a clerk (DCt + CoA) plus 1-2 years in biglaw, does that person really fit the job description? I think applying anyway is the best advice, but my question is how a non-biglaw employer would look at years spent clerking (especially if the non-biglaw position doesn't involve directly engaging in litigation).

minnbills

Gold
Posts: 3311
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm

Re: Clerkships & "Law Firm" Experience Requriements

Post by minnbills » Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:23 pm

well if a job posting says "3-4 years of experience" and you are a third or fourth year associate, then I think you fit the bill.

In other words, applying for the position while you are a third or fourth year associate is what counts. If you're coming in from another job, say a government agency, then it would probably be a case-by-case kind of thing.

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”