Please don't quote.
Choosing between four firms listed in the poll (all DC). Interested primarily in regulatory work but potentially interested in lit.
SA decision - DC offices Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 433420
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
SA decision - DC offices
Last edited by Anonymous User on Tue Sep 12, 2017 4:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Slytherpuff
- Posts: 5401
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 12:50 pm
Re: SA decision - DC offices
Hogan is the D.C. powerhouse out of those four and should be great for regulatory work.
-
zhenders
- Posts: 943
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:21 pm
Re: SA decision - DC offices
Agreed with above poster. If you want general lit though, Kirkland's DC office would be a hell of a place to work too, especially given that Paul Clement and his team came on board.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 433420
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: SA decision - DC offices
If you're conservative, Kirkland. If you're not, Hogan.
-
radio1nowhere
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 7:01 pm
Re: SA decision - DC offices
That's.. terrible advice. Please disregard, OP.Anonymous User wrote:If you're conservative, Kirkland. If you're not, Hogan.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 433420
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: SA decision - DC offices
Sorry, I misread and didn't realize OP had a meaningful preference for regulatory over lit (as opposed to being indifferent between the two). In that case, Hogan. I stand by my assertion that if OP is conservative and interested in lit, the connections that OP can make in the conservative legal world through Paul Clement and the Bancroft people are probably unparalleled.radio1nowhere wrote:That's.. terrible advice. Please disregard, OP.Anonymous User wrote:If you're conservative, Kirkland. If you're not, Hogan.
-
RaceJudicata
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm
Re: SA decision - DC offices
But you don't actually believe that your average SA / junior associate is going to get meaningful contact w/ Clement & Co., right?Anonymous User wrote:Sorry, I misread and didn't realize OP had a meaningful preference for regulatory over lit (as opposed to being indifferent between the two). In that case, Hogan. I stand by my assertion that if OP is conservative and interested in lit, the connections that OP can make in the conservative legal world through Paul Clement and the Bancroft people are probably unparalleled.radio1nowhere wrote:That's.. terrible advice. Please disregard, OP.Anonymous User wrote:If you're conservative, Kirkland. If you're not, Hogan.
