General Litigation or IP in California? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432622
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
General Litigation or IP in California?
I'm looking at only California firms, mostly Silicon Valley, with a strict interest in litigation, leaning towards IP. I think I would enjoy IP lit, but I may someday want to lateral over to government work. With this possible future interest in mind, would it serve me better to work at a more generalist litigation firm (Simpson Thacher/Davis Polk, for example), or a firm where I could really focus on IP work (Orrick/Fenwick/WilmerHale)?
