Latham Watkins v. Gibson Dunn (NY)? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
sonny@cheeba
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:40 pm
Latham Watkins v. Gibson Dunn (NY)?
I'm very interested in practicing in New York after law school. I am not, however, fully aware of the transactional practices at both offices. I was wondering if anyone could give me the inside scoop as to which would be a better fit for a prospective student interested in corporate finance, private equity, etc.
-
SLS_AMG
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 9:18 pm
Re: Latham Watkins v. Gibson Dunn (NY)?
Latham & Watkins is better known for its corporate practice than its litigation practice.
Gibson Dunn is better known for its litigation practice than its corporate practice.
Both of these reputations hold true in New York.
Hope this helps.
Gibson Dunn is better known for its litigation practice than its corporate practice.
Both of these reputations hold true in New York.
Hope this helps.
