Have we discussed on this board the prevalence of 9-5 legal jobs Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
jd20132013

- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:41 pm
Have we discussed on this board the prevalence of 9-5 legal jobs
That are interesting--pay not being a factor at all?
I realize the only job that can be reasonable hours, well paid, and interesting is probably a federal judge , but what about the first and third ?
I realize the only job that can be reasonable hours, well paid, and interesting is probably a federal judge , but what about the first and third ?
- UVA2B

- Posts: 3570
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Have we discussed on this board the prevalence of 9-5 legal jobs
How do you define a career that is "interesting?" That basic question seems too opaque to give any substantive answer. Is an interesting career based on practice area, intellectual challenge, varied experience, or something else?
My definition of an interesting career could be wildly different from yours, but neither of us can accurately define the term that provides any value. My ideal career will be cumulative with my previous experience in a way that lets me leverage my experience into quality work and team-based projects, but that's certainly not for everyone, even considering how vague that description may be.
My definition of an interesting career could be wildly different from yours, but neither of us can accurately define the term that provides any value. My ideal career will be cumulative with my previous experience in a way that lets me leverage my experience into quality work and team-based projects, but that's certainly not for everyone, even considering how vague that description may be.
-
jd20132013

- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:41 pm
Re: Have we discussed on this board the prevalence of 9-5 legal jobs
I'm op, topic was accidental anon. Good question. I mean here intellectual challenge, which I find generally interesting--I recognize that people may have different substantive interestsUVA2B wrote:How do you define a career that is "interesting?" That basic question seems too opaque to give any substantive answer. Is an interesting career based on practice area, intellectual challenge, varied experience, or something else?
My definition of an interesting career could be wildly different from yours, but neither of us can accurately define the term that provides any value. My ideal career will be cumulative with my previous experience in a way that lets me leverage my experience into quality work and team-based projects, but that's certainly not for everyone, even considering how vague that description may be.
-
dixiecupdrinking

- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: Have we discussed on this board the prevalence of 9-5 legal jobs
Probably local or state government is gonna be the closest. YMMV whether you'll find it interesting.
-
Nebby

- Posts: 31195
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm
Re: Have we discussed on this board the prevalence of 9-5 legal jobs
Fed Agency work is mostly 9-5 and if you find the substantive area interesting then it's a decent gig.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- los blancos

- Posts: 8397
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: Have we discussed on this board the prevalence of 9-5 legal jobs
Anonymous User wrote:That are interesting--pay not being a factor at all?
I realize the only job that can be reasonable hours, well paid, and interesting is probably a federal judge , but what about the first and third ?
this is highly dependent on the district; idea that federal judges (especially d. ct. judges) have it relatively easy is giant flame.
-
jd20132013

- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:41 pm
Re: Have we discussed on this board the prevalence of 9-5 legal jobs
los blancos wrote:Anonymous User wrote:That are interesting--pay not being a factor at all?
I realize the only job that can be reasonable hours, well paid, and interesting is probably a federal judge , but what about the first and third ?
this is highly dependent on the district; idea that federal judges (especially d. ct. judges) have it relatively easy is giant flame.
I carefully said "can be" there. The ones that care deeply about getting things right and not getting reversed don't have it easy. Not all of them do.
- nealric

- Posts: 4397
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: Have we discussed on this board the prevalence of 9-5 legal jobs
My in-house job runs on a 9/80 (80 hours per two weeks worked, but working 9 hours a day). There are occasional nights/weekends, but it's pretty much a 9-5 type of gig. Pay is good. Work is interesting.