How'd that translate into screeners received? Mostly from NYC? Midwest? Even mix of all?Carlton_Banks wrote:Awesome. Doubt I'll be happy with the results, but I appreciate the info.Anonymous User wrote:Write on results should be released this Friday barring any delays from delinquent EICs.
40% DC , 40% NY, and 20% Midwest.Throwaonetwothree wrote: Which market(s) did you bid?
GULC EIW 2017 Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 7:25 pm
Re: GULC EIW 2017
- Carlton_Banks
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 5:25 pm
Re: GULC EIW 2017
Pretty representative of my bidding.Throwaonetwothree wrote: How'd that translate into screeners received? Mostly from NYC? Midwest? Even mix of all?
-
- Posts: 431104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GULC EIW 2017
Got an interview with NYC Jones Day after bidding them at 12 as a reach. Honestly, I didn't think I would get an interview given the firms popularity. I have a 3.38, does anyone know if I am below their floor? (No GULC data on Jones Day NYC, Jones Day Washington DC Median is a 3.5+)
- Mr. Blackacre
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 11:48 pm
Re: GULC EIW 2017
Couple of things:Anonymous User wrote:Got an interview with NYC Jones Day after bidding them at 12 as a reach. Honestly, I didn't think I would get an interview given the firms popularity. I have a 3.38, does anyone know if I am below their floor? (No GULC data on Jones Day NYC, Jones Day Washington DC Median is a 3.5+)
- 2 years ago, median for JD DC was only 3.45 - I think it fluctuates more than you'd think
- Anecdotal info + data from other schools suggests the NY office has slightly lower standards than the DC office
- JD sucks. It is very possible that they call back people with high gpa, bumping up their median, but that the high-gpa people accept other offers.
Long story short, you're definitely not below their floor. If that's what you want, you could definitely get a callback.
-
- Posts: 431104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GULC EIW 2017
Would anyone be interested in compiling a list of the firms you missed out on and your rank of bids? With enough data points we could probably piece together which firms used a preselect on you.
For example, say Hogan DC said no to me at 7, but you bid them 10 and got an interview, then you'd know you were preselected. (I made that up. Didn't bid Hogan DC)
For example, say Hogan DC said no to me at 7, but you bid them 10 and got an interview, then you'd know you were preselected. (I made that up. Didn't bid Hogan DC)
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GULC EIW 2017
That sounds like a lot of effort for a very low return... At a lot of firms, your interviewer won't know if you were preselected, so it doesn't impact much at all. And even if it did - how would that change your behavior? Are you not going to prepare as much for a preselect interview?Anonymous User wrote:Would anyone be interested in compiling a list of the firms you missed out on and your rank of bids? With enough data points we could probably piece together which firms used a preselect on you.
For example, say Hogan DC said no to me at 7, but you bid them 10 and got an interview, then you'd know you were preselected. (I made that up. Didn't bid Hogan DC)
I get the "but I really wanna know" feeling... but this seems a bit extreme.
-
- Posts: 1103
- Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2014 2:52 pm
Re: GULC EIW 2017
Yeah, this seems unnecessary. And there is no reason to treat preselects differently. The person who goes through the resumes to pick preselects is not necessarily the one who makes hiring final decisions. And, as long as you meet a firm's general grade requirements, the interview is more important than the only-on-paper selection process. You shouldn't be over confident if you were preselected. And you certainly shouldn't be disappointed if you were not. Just research the firms, be prepared, and focus on interviewing.Anonymous User wrote:That sounds like a lot of effort for a very low return... At a lot of firms, your interviewer won't know if you were preselected, so it doesn't impact much at all. And even if it did - how would that change your behavior? Are you not going to prepare as much for a preselect interview?Anonymous User wrote:Would anyone be interested in compiling a list of the firms you missed out on and your rank of bids? With enough data points we could probably piece together which firms used a preselect on you.
For example, say Hogan DC said no to me at 7, but you bid them 10 and got an interview, then you'd know you were preselected. (I made that up. Didn't bid Hogan DC)
I get the "but I really wanna know" feeling... but this seems a bit extreme.
-
- Posts: 431104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GULC EIW 2017
It also wouldn't be an exact science because if you miss out on any given bid, your next bid moves up. For example, if you bid Latham DC #1, but by the time the lottery gets to you, Latham DC is maxed out, your #2 becomes your number one and so on.WhiskeyAndCupcakes wrote:Yeah, this seems unnecessary. And there is no reason to treat preselects differently. The person who goes through the resumes to pick preselects is not necessarily the one who makes hiring final decisions. And, as long as you meet a firm's general grade requirements, the interview is more important than the only-on-paper selection process. You shouldn't be over confident if you were preselected. And you certainly shouldn't be disappointed if you were not. Just research the firms, be prepared, and focus on interviewing.Anonymous User wrote:That sounds like a lot of effort for a very low return... At a lot of firms, your interviewer won't know if you were preselected, so it doesn't impact much at all. And even if it did - how would that change your behavior? Are you not going to prepare as much for a preselect interview?Anonymous User wrote:Would anyone be interested in compiling a list of the firms you missed out on and your rank of bids? With enough data points we could probably piece together which firms used a preselect on you.
For example, say Hogan DC said no to me at 7, but you bid them 10 and got an interview, then you'd know you were preselected. (I made that up. Didn't bid Hogan DC)
I get the "but I really wanna know" feeling... but this seems a bit extreme.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 3:18 pm
Re: GULC EIW 2017
Agree that it's not worth trying to figure out pre-selects, it's just pretty lame that Georgetown doesn't disclose. Like honestly, is anyone going to go into an interview and act like a douche just because they weren't pre-selected?
Anyways, does anyone know much about ghost interviews? Do most firms conduct them, how many, etc. It would be interesting to know whether something on your resume really sparked their interest, or if they just contact all their pre-selects so they have a deeper pool.
Anyways, does anyone know much about ghost interviews? Do most firms conduct them, how many, etc. It would be interesting to know whether something on your resume really sparked their interest, or if they just contact all their pre-selects so they have a deeper pool.
-
- Posts: 431104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GULC EIW 2017
Some (but I wouldn't necessarily say most) firms do additional interview schedules. Some do the interviews in another hotel room they booked; some do them in their offices; some do them in the hospitality suite after interviews wrap up for the day. The number depends on the firm. I'd guess most firms with side schedules bring in about 10-20 people, though some may have more.
You may get emails from recruiters saying that they would like to interview you. Grades help in getting invitations for side schedules, though I am not sure exactly how firms select people.
With that said, it can't hurt to proactively email the firms that you bid but didn't match for an interview with. Reiterate your interest/ let them know you'd love to interview with them. A follow-up email can convert into an interview if the firm is interested.
You may get emails from recruiters saying that they would like to interview you. Grades help in getting invitations for side schedules, though I am not sure exactly how firms select people.
With that said, it can't hurt to proactively email the firms that you bid but didn't match for an interview with. Reiterate your interest/ let them know you'd love to interview with them. A follow-up email can convert into an interview if the firm is interested.
-
- Posts: 431104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GULC EIW 2017
I bid put Orrick NY in my 18th slot. Did anyone get them and bid lower or higher?
-
- Posts: 431104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GULC EIW 2017
I got them in the low 20s.Anonymous User wrote:I bid put Orrick NY in my 18th slot. Did anyone get them and bid lower or higher?
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 10:27 am
Re: GULC EIW 2017
Any idea's what time this is happening today? (if it is) Is it usually a call or email?Anonymous User wrote:Write on results should be released this Friday barring any delays from delinquent EICs.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GULC EIW 2017
I only got 7 screeners and definitely feel like the lottery was not kind this year. I did hours of research in constructing my bid list but still missed on some pretty sure fire bids in years past (Schulte, NY at #7, Paul Hastings, NY at #8, Linklaters, NY at #9, etc.). Here is to camping out on open sign-up to push that up to at least 10-12 screeners.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2017 10:23 am
Re: GULC EIW 2017
How many did you bid on?Anonymous User wrote:I only got 7 screeners and definitely feel like the lottery was not kind this year. I did hours of research in constructing my bid list but still missed on some pretty sure fire bids in years past (Schulte, NY at #7, Paul Hastings, NY at #8, Linklaters, NY at #9, etc.). Here is to camping out on open sign-up to push that up to at least 10-12 screeners.
-
- Posts: 431104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GULC EIW 2017
Same anon, I used all 50 bids and did mostly NY, sprinkled in some secondaries towards the bottom.gulc2019 wrote:How many did you bid on?
-
- Posts: 431104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GULC EIW 2017
LEAK: Journal results are finalized. Expect an email between 1 and 2 pm today.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Carlton_Banks
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 5:25 pm
Re: GULC EIW 2017
Thanks, Reince.Anonymous User wrote:LEAK: Journal results are finalized. Expect an email between 1 and 2 pm today.
Approx. class rank?Anonymous User wrote:Same anon, I used all 50 bids and did mostly NY, sprinkled in some secondaries towards the bottom.gulc2019 wrote:How many did you bid on?
-
- Posts: 431104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GULC EIW 2017
I see myself as more of a Jim Comey kind of leaker.Carlton_Banks wrote:Thanks, Reince.Anonymous User wrote:LEAK: Journal results are finalized. Expect an email between 1 and 2 pm today.
-
- Posts: 431104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GULC EIW 2017
Slightly below median so not too surprised by the lack of screeners.Carlton_Banks wrote:Approx. class rank?
-
- Posts: 431104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GULC EIW 2017
Use open sign up, email firms, go to hospitality suites. I think I got about 10 from the lottery and was able to double that number. 5-6 were from open sign up. The number you get from the lottery is just a starting point.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GULC EIW 2017
Girl you are no ComeyAnonymous User wrote:I see myself as more of a Jim Comey kind of leaker.Carlton_Banks wrote:Thanks, Reince.Anonymous User wrote:LEAK: Journal results are finalized. Expect an email between 1 and 2 pm today.
- Carlton_Banks
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2017 5:25 pm
Re: GULC EIW 2017
The leaks weren't fake news. Matches are up.
-
- Posts: 431104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GULC EIW 2017
Don't see matches up and no email
-
- Posts: 431104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GULC EIW 2017
What exactly do Journal office hours entail?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login