SF litigation Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
User avatar
BottomOfTotem

New
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 10:05 am

SF litigation

Post by BottomOfTotem » Sun Jun 11, 2017 10:34 pm

Outside of the super selective firms (i.e. Keker and MTO), what would be the top 10 firms in SF for litigation. This would be for those without a technical background.

Obviously this is subjective, but I would like to hear everyone's list. I am trying to ignore Vault, but chambers hasn't been overly helpful. So, hi there TLS...

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: SF litigation

Post by rpupkin » Mon Jun 12, 2017 2:30 am

BottomOfTotem wrote:Outside of the super selective firms (i.e. Keker and MTO), what would be the top 10 firms in SF for litigation. This would be for those without a technical background.
What is your definition of a "top firm?" This is a serious question. What do you want/value in a law firm?

User avatar
BottomOfTotem

New
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 10:05 am

Re: SF litigation

Post by BottomOfTotem » Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:41 am

You're right, I should have been more clear. My apologies.

I'm mainly thinking of peer perception at this point, as in prestige. Additionally, any information regarding early responsibility and or good places to work are welcome.

User avatar
hangold

New
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:25 am

Re: SF litigation

Post by hangold » Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:48 am

If you're interested in antitrust, securities, or white collar work, firms that immediately come to mind are Latham and Gibson Dunn.

sanzgo

New
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed May 10, 2017 11:14 am

Re: SF litigation

Post by sanzgo » Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:12 pm

second GD SF

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
BottomOfTotem

New
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 10:05 am

Re: SF litigation

Post by BottomOfTotem » Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:44 am

Bump.

But also, any thoughts on OMM, Cooley and or Orrick for SF lit?

jd20132013

Silver
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:41 pm

Re: SF litigation

Post by jd20132013 » Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:49 am

All very prestigious.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”