SF litigation Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- BottomOfTotem
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 10:05 am
SF litigation
Outside of the super selective firms (i.e. Keker and MTO), what would be the top 10 firms in SF for litigation. This would be for those without a technical background.
Obviously this is subjective, but I would like to hear everyone's list. I am trying to ignore Vault, but chambers hasn't been overly helpful. So, hi there TLS...
Obviously this is subjective, but I would like to hear everyone's list. I am trying to ignore Vault, but chambers hasn't been overly helpful. So, hi there TLS...
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: SF litigation
What is your definition of a "top firm?" This is a serious question. What do you want/value in a law firm?BottomOfTotem wrote:Outside of the super selective firms (i.e. Keker and MTO), what would be the top 10 firms in SF for litigation. This would be for those without a technical background.
- BottomOfTotem
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 10:05 am
Re: SF litigation
You're right, I should have been more clear. My apologies.
I'm mainly thinking of peer perception at this point, as in prestige. Additionally, any information regarding early responsibility and or good places to work are welcome.
I'm mainly thinking of peer perception at this point, as in prestige. Additionally, any information regarding early responsibility and or good places to work are welcome.
- hangold
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:25 am
Re: SF litigation
If you're interested in antitrust, securities, or white collar work, firms that immediately come to mind are Latham and Gibson Dunn.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- BottomOfTotem
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 10:05 am
Re: SF litigation
Bump.
But also, any thoughts on OMM, Cooley and or Orrick for SF lit?
But also, any thoughts on OMM, Cooley and or Orrick for SF lit?