Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 431347
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
- Lincoln
- Posts: 1208
- Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:27 pm
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
Quality post, OP.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
How many attys?
-
- Posts: 431347
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
From the press release, it looks like two equity partners and one non equity partner, all corporate. Doesn't mention associates.jbagelboy wrote:How many attys?
-
- Posts: 431347
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
Just announced this AM, so definitely will be built out over the summer. Probably similar trajectory to Houston.Anonymous User wrote:From the press release, it looks like two equity partners and one non equity partner, all corporate. Doesn't mention associates.jbagelboy wrote:How many attys?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 591
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 12:02 pm
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
yeah but y tho?
-
- Posts: 431347
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
Boston PE firms.Abbie Doobie wrote:yeah but y tho?
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
Kirkland is killing it. Besides wachtell, I think they've got the brightest law future.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
overexpansion trap tho?Johann wrote:Kirkland is killing it. Besides wachtell, I think they've got the brightest law future.
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
could be. my gut tells me in a globalized world (and a proven brand) theres no such thing.jbagelboy wrote:overexpansion trap tho?Johann wrote:Kirkland is killing it. Besides wachtell, I think they've got the brightest law future.
the latest amlaw numbers indicate to me theres enough growth opps for the V10 (and a couple other players) to basically swallow the legal demand of the V50 and then create 2 stratifications of biglaw - mega firms and rote law firms. rote law firms will be doing a shitload of compliance and Big 4 like tasks, and the top dollar value add will be reserved for the new 15 or so firms absolutely dominating right now. boutiques will of course continue to have their place.
-
- Posts: 431347
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
Can't wait to get Lathamed by Kirkland when the recession hits.
-
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 2:17 am
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
I'm sympathetic to this view, but I'd like to hear what others have to say re litigation--will the 2 stratifications be the same there as well?Johann wrote: the latest amlaw numbers indicate to me theres enough growth opps for the V10 (and a couple other players) to basically swallow the legal demand of the V50 and then create 2 stratifications of biglaw - mega firms and rote law firms. rote law firms will be doing a shitload of compliance and Big 4 like tasks, and the top dollar value add will be reserved for the new 15 or so firms absolutely dominating right now. boutiques will of course continue to have their place.
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
It seems that most publications and commentators expect a stratification to occur or deepen, although perhaps not as extreme as the one johann predicts.Jchance wrote:I'm sympathetic to this view, but I'd like to hear what others have to say re litigation--will the 2 stratifications be the same there as well?Johann wrote: the latest amlaw numbers indicate to me theres enough growth opps for the V10 (and a couple other players) to basically swallow the legal demand of the V50 and then create 2 stratifications of biglaw - mega firms and rote law firms. rote law firms will be doing a shitload of compliance and Big 4 like tasks, and the top dollar value add will be reserved for the new 15 or so firms absolutely dominating right now. boutiques will of course continue to have their place.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431347
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
I don't think so. Kirkland's litigation practice is shrinking relative to its other practice areas. Doubtful it's going to stratify as much.Jchance wrote:I'm sympathetic to this view, but I'd like to hear what others have to say re litigation--will the 2 stratifications be the same there as well?Johann wrote: the latest amlaw numbers indicate to me theres enough growth opps for the V10 (and a couple other players) to basically swallow the legal demand of the V50 and then create 2 stratifications of biglaw - mega firms and rote law firms. rote law firms will be doing a shitload of compliance and Big 4 like tasks, and the top dollar value add will be reserved for the new 15 or so firms absolutely dominating right now. boutiques will of course continue to have their place.
- skers
- Posts: 5230
- Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:33 am
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
Bigger question is prob why this took as long as it did given Kirkland's major client base in Boston.
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
my statement is def an oversimplification. by "rote" i mean things like fact finding memos in litigation etc, so it wont be your quite bare minimum compliance a lot of big 4 does. its more meant as an example. there will be firms that have the client relationship and handle the day to day work and then firms that handle the truly exceptional work.
for anyone that wants to know what this looks like - here is GE doing it. GE was one of the first major corps to truly focus on carving out an in house legal dept thats as good as external advisors. turns out 30 years later, they are admitting they were wrong. they can cheaper compliance work and rates done by the big 4.
http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/new ... 15836.html
as someone who isnt at a $3mm PPP firm, I'm staying put. I don't think its happening overnight. And I dont necessarily think there wont be a place for the other players. but the huge entry level salaries right out of the gate and huge billable rates paid by clients will probably begin to be separated.
not sure how many chambers rated top partners are going to stick around at non $3mm PPP firms.
for anyone that wants to know what this looks like - here is GE doing it. GE was one of the first major corps to truly focus on carving out an in house legal dept thats as good as external advisors. turns out 30 years later, they are admitting they were wrong. they can cheaper compliance work and rates done by the big 4.
http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/new ... 15836.html
as someone who isnt at a $3mm PPP firm, I'm staying put. I don't think its happening overnight. And I dont necessarily think there wont be a place for the other players. but the huge entry level salaries right out of the gate and huge billable rates paid by clients will probably begin to be separated.
not sure how many chambers rated top partners are going to stick around at non $3mm PPP firms.
-
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 2:17 am
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:26 pm
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
So when are we going to start hearing about laterals and summers getting insane signing bonuses? Like in 3 months when the office has 50 attorneys?
I may shit on KE for their culture, even if I think it's deserved, but damn if they don't know how to just shower new offices with $$$.
I may shit on KE for their culture, even if I think it's deserved, but damn if they don't know how to just shower new offices with $$$.
-
- Posts: 431347
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
Don't think so. They've been really careful about overexpansion.jbagelboy wrote:overexpansion trap tho?Johann wrote:Kirkland is killing it. Besides wachtell, I think they've got the brightest law future.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed May 24, 2017 10:48 am
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
Anyone know how one can apply specifically to that office?
-
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 2:17 am
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
^
reach out to the partners in charge via email and they'd forward your app to the appropriate people.
That said, "[t]he new office will be lead by Kirkland partners Armand A. Della Monica, Neal J. Reenan and Ian N. Bushner. No new attorneys will be hired in the short term, Ballis said."
https://bol.bna.com/kirkland-ellis-to-o ... expansion/
reach out to the partners in charge via email and they'd forward your app to the appropriate people.
That said, "[t]he new office will be lead by Kirkland partners Armand A. Della Monica, Neal J. Reenan and Ian N. Bushner. No new attorneys will be hired in the short term, Ballis said."
https://bol.bna.com/kirkland-ellis-to-o ... expansion/
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:41 pm
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
And yet it's one of the worst places to be an associateJohann wrote:Kirkland is killing it. Besides wachtell, I think they've got the brightest law future.
- SmokeytheBear
- Posts: 926
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 1:40 pm
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
Wouldnt you agree, though, that a better metric for this is AmLaw ranking (i.e. PPP and RPP) rather than Vault ranking (i.e. prestige dartboard).Johann wrote:could be. my gut tells me in a globalized world (and a proven brand) theres no such thing.jbagelboy wrote:overexpansion trap tho?Johann wrote:Kirkland is killing it. Besides wachtell, I think they've got the brightest law future.
the latest amlaw numbers indicate to me theres enough growth opps for the V10 (and a couple other players) to basically swallow the legal demand of the V50 and then create 2 stratifications of biglaw - mega firms and rote law firms. rote law firms will be doing a shitload of compliance and Big 4 like tasks, and the top dollar value add will be reserved for the new 15 or so firms absolutely dominating right now. boutiques will of course continue to have their place.
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
Yeah absolutely. I more just mean they overlap for the most part but yes the amlaw numbers are the telling part.SmokeytheBear wrote:Wouldnt you agree, though, that a better metric for this is AmLaw ranking (i.e. PPP and RPP) rather than Vault ranking (i.e. prestige dartboard).Johann wrote:could be. my gut tells me in a globalized world (and a proven brand) theres no such thing.jbagelboy wrote:overexpansion trap tho?Johann wrote:Kirkland is killing it. Besides wachtell, I think they've got the brightest law future.
the latest amlaw numbers indicate to me theres enough growth opps for the V10 (and a couple other players) to basically swallow the legal demand of the V50 and then create 2 stratifications of biglaw - mega firms and rote law firms. rote law firms will be doing a shitload of compliance and Big 4 like tasks, and the top dollar value add will be reserved for the new 15 or so firms absolutely dominating right now. boutiques will of course continue to have their place.
-
- Posts: 431347
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland & Ellis opening a Boston office
Choate just lost head of PE and a member of its exec committee to K&E Boston today. Pretty crazy and surprising. He was widely seen as a future leader of the firm and one of the biggest rainmakers. Huge loss.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login