Quinn 3L Hiring w/o SA Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 433416
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Quinn 3L Hiring w/o SA
Hey all,
I'm 1/3ish at MVP (barring a disaster this semester) and generally on the public interest track (both 1L & 2L internships are PI) but not completely opposed to biglaw. In researching plaintiff's firms I was reminded that Quinn does some plaintiff-side work. Was thinking of mass-mailing them later this summer but wondering if lack of SA or grades are a total killer.
I'm 1/3ish at MVP (barring a disaster this semester) and generally on the public interest track (both 1L & 2L internships are PI) but not completely opposed to biglaw. In researching plaintiff's firms I was reminded that Quinn does some plaintiff-side work. Was thinking of mass-mailing them later this summer but wondering if lack of SA or grades are a total killer.
- cron1834

- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: Quinn 3L Hiring w/o SA
I can say from experience that top-third at MVP isn't an auto-ding, though it depends very much on the office (LA isn't going to happen). However, during CB they asked me all about my experience at my 2L SA, why I wanted to switch, etc. They're kind of prestige-focused despite the jeans and sandals, so I'd say the no-SA thing could be a killer unless you did something baller during your 2L summer. And to be fair, half of the reason they do 3L hiring is that they figure other firms will already do the vetting and socialization for them, and that's why they pay the $25k to switch firms. In you're case that logic doesn't really apply, so it'll be an uphill battle.
-
mercymainbtw

- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2016 1:49 pm
Re: Quinn 3L Hiring w/o SA
They're paying people 25k to bail on an offer from another firm? lol
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 433416
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Quinn 3L Hiring w/o SA
Thanks cron!
- sundance95

- Posts: 2123
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 7:44 pm
Re: Quinn 3L Hiring w/o SA
Not enoughmercymainbtw wrote:They're paying people 25k to bail on an offer from another firm? lol
- Mickfromgm

- Posts: 144
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 11:40 pm
Re: Quinn 3L Hiring w/o SA
In my humble opinion, top ⅓ of MVP doesn't kill it. But 2 summers at PI (I imagine you also have other stuff on your resume indicating your dedication to, or strong interest in, PI) will be your undoing. They know you wouldn't want to work at Quinn or any other BigLaw over the long term. Believe me, that's how they think. I am sure they'd take a flyer if you are HYS law review or something, but perhaps not ⅓ of MVP. In any event, I am not sure why you are even asking the question -- just email the resume and see what happens -- maybe they'd want to groom the future Director of Pro Bono.
But seriously, you need to think about how to address the PI issue at any private firm interview; you'll be asked for sure.
EDIT: Oops, by "PI" do you mean personal injury or public interest? The public interest track thing got me confused, but you also said plaintiff-side.
EDIT: Oops, by "PI" do you mean personal injury or public interest? The public interest track thing got me confused, but you also said plaintiff-side.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 433416
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Quinn 3L Hiring w/o SA
Got it. Yes, just to clarify, PI=public interest. By plaintiff's firms I'm referring mostly to public-interesty class-action firms that do things like sue over corporate fraud, civil rights violations etc. And yes, I will probably throw an app. Other than LA do you think any other office is out (too competitive) like the person above?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 433416
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Quinn 3L Hiring w/o SA
NY is your best bet.Anonymous User wrote:Got it. Yes, just to clarify, PI=public interest. By plaintiff's firms I'm referring mostly to public-interesty class-action firms that do things like sue over corporate fraud, civil rights violations etc. And yes, I will probably throw an app. Other than LA do you think any other office is out (too competitive) like the person above?
QE's p side work isn't like hagens berman or other shops really. mainly securities and antitrust work, along with other p side breach of contract/some shareholder suit stuff. none of the civil rights stuff and no personal injury stuff because it would conflict with their mass torts defense practice.
if you're PI minded, I think QE would be a very very poor fit.
- cron1834

- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: Quinn 3L Hiring w/o SA
The other occasional plaintiff-side thing they do is IP. And they will hire some ppl without technical backgrounds. But, it's hard to convince someone you're suddenly interested in IP/tech stuff with no demonstrated record. On the other hand, if the PI stuff you did was like EFF, or if you're writing a note on patents, then the Silicon Valley office may be a possibility. I still think uphill battle w/no firm, but I wouldn't say it's impossible.
-
dixiecupdrinking

- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: Quinn 3L Hiring w/o SA
Honestly, with your interests you'd be better off at a more traditional biglaw firm with a good pro bono program than a place like Quinn. Just doing plaintiff work does not mean you're on the side of justice. They do plaintiff work because and only to the extent that it's lucrative.
-
lawlorbust

- Posts: 429
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:50 am
Re: Quinn 3L Hiring w/o SA
5K cheaper than having you as an SAmercymainbtw wrote:They're paying people 25k to bail on an offer from another firm? lol
-
lawlorbust

- Posts: 429
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:50 am
Re: Quinn 3L Hiring w/o SA
Dude? The plaintiff-side thing that they're probably now most known for is suing big banks.cron1834 wrote:The other occasional plaintiff-side thing they do is IP. And they will hire some ppl without technical backgrounds. But, it's hard to convince someone you're suddenly interested in IP/tech stuff with no demonstrated record. On the other hand, if the PI stuff you did was like EFF, or if you're writing a note on patents, then the Silicon Valley office may be a possibility. I still think uphill battle w/no firm, but I wouldn't say it's impossible.
- cron1834

- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: Quinn 3L Hiring w/o SA
Um, that's why I said it's an "other" "occasional" thing they do. But thanks.lawlorbust wrote:Dude? The plaintiff-side thing that they're probably now most known for is suing big banks.cron1834 wrote:The other occasional plaintiff-side thing they do is IP. And they will hire some ppl without technical backgrounds. But, it's hard to convince someone you're suddenly interested in IP/tech stuff with no demonstrated record. On the other hand, if the PI stuff you did was like EFF, or if you're writing a note on patents, then the Silicon Valley office may be a possibility. I still think uphill battle w/no firm, but I wouldn't say it's impossible.
-
gaddockteeg

- Posts: 439
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 5:33 pm
Re: Quinn 3L Hiring w/o SA
It's actually 35k.sundance95 wrote:Not enoughmercymainbtw wrote:They're paying people 25k to bail on an offer from another firm? lol
-
ernie

- Posts: 170
- Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2017 12:34 am
Re: Quinn 3L Hiring w/o SA
Quinn did the stop and frisk class action in NYC.Anonymous User wrote:QE's p side work isn't like hagens berman or other shops really. mainly securities and antitrust work, along with other p side breach of contract/some shareholder suit stuff. none of the civil rights stuff and no personal injury stuff because it would conflict with their mass torts defense practice.
-
malibustacy

- Posts: 287
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 3:34 am
Re: Quinn 3L Hiring w/o SA
Plus the cost of events, meals, etc.gaddockteeg wrote:It's actually 35k.sundance95 wrote:Not enoughmercymainbtw wrote:They're paying people 25k to bail on an offer from another firm? lol
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 433416
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Quinn 3L Hiring w/o SA
QE is not a good fit if you want to do plaintiffs' work. I would find a real plaintiffs' firm - your credentials will be fine for most of them (not places like Altshuler Berzon, but most good plaintiffs' firms), you will get better experience and training and not hate your life, and there's a nonzero chance you'll get to wear jeans to work every day anyways.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 433416
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Quinn 3L Hiring w/o SA
Which one? The famous one was Debevoise but those are mainly run by non-profits, not firms.ernie wrote:Quinn did the stop and frisk class action in NYC.Anonymous User wrote:QE's p side work isn't like hagens berman or other shops really. mainly securities and antitrust work, along with other p side breach of contract/some shareholder suit stuff. none of the civil rights stuff and no personal injury stuff because it would conflict with their mass torts defense practice.
I believe Covington did one as well.
Either way, this is not an active practice area at Quinn.