Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 12:02 am
Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
Anyone else have this sentiment? I'm curious if firms/partners you know practice this mentality. Obviously, most do not.
The insane billing, the bottom line, it all seems so backwards from how things are supposed to operate. Lawyers shouldn't be millionaires.
I don't even really have a specific question. Please don't take this as rants of a fading associate or a self-righteous blurb. I just want to know if people actually practice with this mindset.
The insane billing, the bottom line, it all seems so backwards from how things are supposed to operate. Lawyers shouldn't be millionaires.
I don't even really have a specific question. Please don't take this as rants of a fading associate or a self-righteous blurb. I just want to know if people actually practice with this mindset.
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
Who is supposed to be rich?
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
Not that I fully disagree with the sentiment, but how much should you pay people who can obtain millions of dollars for you or prevent others from doing that to you?
-
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:42 am
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
Law school isn't supposed to cost so much. Spend your concern and moral outrage there.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
Do you mean not "supposed" to be rich like LeBron isn't "supposed" to make $30M for throwing a ball through a ring?
Clients believe that lawyers add value, and they pay for even some of the most deliberately inefficient things we do.
If you think it's crazy, you can call up all the clients of every millionaire lawyer and offer to do all their work at half the rate, and see what kind of answers you get.
Clients believe that lawyers add value, and they pay for even some of the most deliberately inefficient things we do.
If you think it's crazy, you can call up all the clients of every millionaire lawyer and offer to do all their work at half the rate, and see what kind of answers you get.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:05 pm
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
This is disturbing. Besides, the vast majority of lawyers, even at large law firms, aren't actually rich.
Last edited by Hikikomorist on Tue Apr 04, 2017 10:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
- deepseapartners
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 11:49 pm
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
I would be legitimately curious to hear how you think things should operate.SemiReverseSplinter wrote:The insane billing, the bottom line, it all seems so backwards from how things are supposed to operate.
-
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
lawyers should work for free, duh.deepseapartners wrote:I would be legitimately curious to hear how you think things should operate.SemiReverseSplinter wrote:The insane billing, the bottom line, it all seems so backwards from how things are supposed to operate.
-
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
This. It will take the average biglaw associate 7 years to make 300k base and a whole lot of billable hours, stress, and missed vacation and family time.Hikikomorist wrote:This is disturbing. Besides, the cast majority of lawyers, even at large law firms, aren't actually rich.
That amount of money is made as a bonus by some 23 year old on Wall Street.
The only sure way to wealth is to become the captain of your own ship. Can't do this by being an employee (or having an employee mindset).
- los blancos
- Posts: 8397
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
Nah. Most of the time it's CYA. Most biglaw partners aren't worth 1/3 of their billing rates.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Clients believe that lawyers add value, and they pay for even some of the most deliberately inefficient things we do.
Clients routinely throw money in the garbage.
-
- Posts: 8058
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 2:47 pm
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
Private practice is overpayed, PI is underpayed, government is kinda mixed, and society as a whole incorrectly values the work we expend. #UBI
Last edited by FSK on Sat Jan 27, 2018 1:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- zot1
- Posts: 4476
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:53 am
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
But I wanna...
- buckiguy_sucks
- Posts: 2876
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:07 pm
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
Lawyer median income is like twice the median household income duderHikikomorist wrote:This is disturbing. Besides, the cast majority of lawyers, even at large law firms, aren't actually rich.
Don't have to have fuck you money to be rich
(although income doesn't necessarily correlate with financial well being)
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
This.los blancos wrote:Nah. Most of the time it's CYA. Most biglaw partners aren't worth 1/3 of their billing rates.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Clients believe that lawyers add value, and they pay for even some of the most deliberately inefficient things we do.
Clients routinely throw money in the garbage.
A business model that will soon change. Technology is the future, folks.
- los blancos
- Posts: 8397
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
We've had these discussions before but I don't see technology changing it all that much, particularly in the near term.Anonymous User wrote:This.los blancos wrote:Nah. Most of the time it's CYA. Most biglaw partners aren't worth 1/3 of their billing rates.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Clients believe that lawyers add value, and they pay for even some of the most deliberately inefficient things we do.
Clients routinely throw money in the garbage.
A business model that will soon change. Technology is the future, folks.
-
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
Let's please not go down this road again. . .Anonymous User wrote:This.los blancos wrote:Nah. Most of the time it's CYA. Most biglaw partners aren't worth 1/3 of their billing rates.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Clients believe that lawyers add value, and they pay for even some of the most deliberately inefficient things we do.
Clients routinely throw money in the garbage.
A business model that will soon change. Technology is the future, folks.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
Companies frequently pay millions and billions for the sole purpose of reducing risk. CYA *is* value. And to preempt the automation/changing business model discussion, it will be value until whenever clients decide that it isn't.los blancos wrote:Nah. Most of the time it's CYA. Most biglaw partners aren't worth 1/3 of their billing rates.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Clients believe that lawyers add value, and they pay for even some of the most deliberately inefficient things we do.
Clients routinely throw money in the garbage.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- los blancos
- Posts: 8397
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
(Assumes clients have any meaningful idea what "risk" is)Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:Companies frequently pay millions and billions for the sole purpose of reducing risk. CYA *is* value. And to preempt the automation/changing business model discussion, it will be value until whenever clients decide that it isn't.los blancos wrote:Nah. Most of the time it's CYA. Most biglaw partners aren't worth 1/3 of their billing rates.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Clients believe that lawyers add value, and they pay for even some of the most deliberately inefficient things we do.
Clients routinely throw money in the garbage.
And just lol @ "I hired a $1200/hr guy, don't blame me if shit hits the fan!" having *value*.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
The fact that clients suffer from (a) principal/agent issues and (b) idiocy is not our problem. We sell, they buy. Sometimes it's legit, sometimes it's just milking a name.los blancos wrote:(Assumes clients have any meaningful idea what "risk" is)Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:Companies frequently pay millions and billions for the sole purpose of reducing risk. CYA *is* value. And to preempt the automation/changing business model discussion, it will be value until whenever clients decide that it isn't.los blancos wrote:Nah. Most of the time it's CYA. Most biglaw partners aren't worth 1/3 of their billing rates.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Clients believe that lawyers add value, and they pay for even some of the most deliberately inefficient things we do.
Clients routinely throw money in the garbage.
And just lol @ "I hired a $1200/hr guy, don't blame me if shit hits the fan!" having *value*.
Who cares? Law schools scam lawyers, lawyers scam corporations, and corporations, with the help of lawyers, scam everyone. Just be happy that the economy is structured in a way that moving commas counts as a "skill."
- nealric
- Posts: 4393
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
That's not a sure way to wealth either. Your business can fail. There is no sure way to wealth, period. However, the most reliable is probably the "millionaire next-door" strategy. Have a steady income, live below your means, invest. You won't ever be a zillionaire, but $5 million (2017 dollars) is very doable by the time you retire with a modestly successful legal career.Anonymous User wrote: The only sure way to wealth is to become the captain of your own ship. Can't do this by being an employee (or having an employee mindset).
-
- Posts: 953
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 3:55 pm
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
The percentage of attorneys that are wealthy and megawealthy is very small. And I would be interested to see the numbers of those megawealthy attorneys that didn't come from money or already have money.
Anyone who says otherwise watches too much TV.
Anyone who says otherwise watches too much TV.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- kellyfrost
- Posts: 6362
- Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 3:58 pm
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
I became an attorney thinking I would become rich. Instead, I should have been a farmer. Farmers make way more bank than attorneys do.
Last edited by kellyfrost on Sat Jan 27, 2018 2:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- nealric
- Posts: 4393
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
So much of this depends on your personal definition of wealthy and "mega wealthy. If "wealthy" means financially independent, most retired lawyers probably fit the definition. If "mega wealthy" means billionaire, keep in mind there's only about 2,000 billionaires in the entire world- many of whom come from dynasties of of one sort or another.1styearlateral wrote:The percentage of attorneys that are wealthy and megawealthy is very small. And I would be interested to see the numbers of those megawealthy attorneys that didn't come from money or already have money.
Anyone who says otherwise watches too much TV.
-
- Posts: 7791
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:05 pm
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
Have lawyer salaries been keeping up with those of other white-collar professionals.
-
- Posts: 432598
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lawyers aren't supposed to be rich
Well, at least in transactional practice, the whole system of law firms giving companies an opinion does a couple things, namely providing a type of "insurance" in case the law firm really effed up and missed/misstated/misguaged some risk(s), and helps assuage the company/management that the transaction is on the up-and-up (lawyers signed off, and they would say no if it was not, so it must be okay). It's CYA bc the GC can tell management that "prestigious" outside counsel is okay with the deal, management can tell board that GC/outside counsel are okay with it, and everyone has a finger to point, and the opinion is the piece of paper that let's the firm gets sued when they screw up.los blancos wrote:(Assumes clients have any meaningful idea what "risk" is)Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:Companies frequently pay millions and billions for the sole purpose of reducing risk. CYA *is* value. And to preempt the automation/changing business model discussion, it will be value until whenever clients decide that it isn't.los blancos wrote:Nah. Most of the time it's CYA. Most biglaw partners aren't worth 1/3 of their billing rates.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:
Clients believe that lawyers add value, and they pay for even some of the most deliberately inefficient things we do.
Clients routinely throw money in the garbage.
And just lol @ "I hired a $1200/hr guy, don't blame me if shit hits the fan!" having *value*.
And to be fair, on a lot of deals where lawyers are billing at over $1000, legal fees are sometimes rounding errors because of the deal sizes. These types of company are not typically price-sensitive and don't care as much if they spend a mill or two on a deal that nets the company several hundred million (or more).
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login