Which applicant do you like better? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432509
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Which applicant do you like better?
Junior associate on my firm's hiring committee here.
I've got two resumes of two close friends in front of me and I can only push one forward as my "recommendation" for an interview.
I want to push the one with the highest chance of actually getting the job/interview.
One is a median at MVBD. The other is top 1/3 at T20. Both are 2Ls. Neither are on LR. Both have moot court/secondary journal.
If you were a random mid-level/senior associate on my firm's hiring committee, who would you prefer to give an interview to?
Edit: this is NOT for my own home office. It's a satellite office of our secondary (home) market (all 3 of us went to HS together). FWIW, the T20 student is geographically closer to the home market but its still a couple hours flight time.
I've got two resumes of two close friends in front of me and I can only push one forward as my "recommendation" for an interview.
I want to push the one with the highest chance of actually getting the job/interview.
One is a median at MVBD. The other is top 1/3 at T20. Both are 2Ls. Neither are on LR. Both have moot court/secondary journal.
If you were a random mid-level/senior associate on my firm's hiring committee, who would you prefer to give an interview to?
Edit: this is NOT for my own home office. It's a satellite office of our secondary (home) market (all 3 of us went to HS together). FWIW, the T20 student is geographically closer to the home market but its still a couple hours flight time.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Thu Dec 29, 2016 1:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
- zot1
- Posts: 4476
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:53 am
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
Which one would be the better fit?
- Clemenceau
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 11:33 am
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
This poll will probably be skewed because this site very likely has more median t14ers than top 1/3 t20ers.
-
- Posts: 3592
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:55 pm
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
True, but I also don't think there's a meaningful distinction in ability between someone at median and someone in top 1/3.Clemenceau wrote:This poll will probably be skewed because this site very likely has more median t14ers than top 1/3 t20ers.
Last edited by GreenEggs on Fri Jan 26, 2018 8:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- emkay625
- Posts: 1988
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:31 pm
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
1. Does either have any work experience prior to law school?
2. Do they both want the same practice group? (In other words, is there a chance one wants a practice group the firm particularly needs and the other does not?)
Edited to add: I'd also probably look at course selection/grades in certain classes. For instance, if they want lit, I'd see if one had a much better legal writing grade than the other.
2. Do they both want the same practice group? (In other words, is there a chance one wants a practice group the firm particularly needs and the other does not?)
Edited to add: I'd also probably look at course selection/grades in certain classes. For instance, if they want lit, I'd see if one had a much better legal writing grade than the other.
Last edited by emkay625 on Tue Dec 27, 2016 9:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1651
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:42 am
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
I'm not in either category but I think median at t14 is objectively better. Top 1/3 at t20 means you didn't get into a great law school, and you didn't do great in law school.
- zot1
- Posts: 4476
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:53 am
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
Hutz_and_Goodman wrote:I'm not in either category but I think median at t14 is objectively better. Top 1/3 at t20 means you didn't get into a great law school, and you didn't do great in law school.

- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
Or you took the full ride at Wash U like a gazillion other people.Hutz_and_Goodman wrote:I'm not in either category but I think median at t14 is objectively better. Top 1/3 at t20 means you didn't get into a great law school, and you didn't do great in law school.
- whats an updog
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:12 am
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
I'd give it to the T20 guy because he probably has less of a chance of getting a job anywhere than your median t14 friend.
-
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
Agree.whats an updog wrote:I'd give it to the T20 guy because he probably has less of a chance of getting a job anywhere than your median t14 friend.
- trebekismyhero
- Posts: 1095
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 5:26 pm
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
YepRaceJudicata wrote:Agree.whats an updog wrote:I'd give it to the T20 guy because he probably has less of a chance of getting a job anywhere than your median t14 friend.
-
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 1:20 am
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
sametrebekismyhero wrote:YepRaceJudicata wrote:Agree.whats an updog wrote:I'd give it to the T20 guy because he probably has less of a chance of getting a job anywhere than your median t14 friend.
-
- Posts: 676
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 9:00 pm
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
Maybe a little edge for the t14et on paper but both solid so I'd recommend the one more fun to chill with
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2015 6:00 pm
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
.
Last edited by Bach-City on Mon Aug 28, 2017 12:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
- cron1834
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
Firm likes to bill out T14 people more than T20. Might as well back the horse likely to win. Vote is telling here.
-
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
I also think it's telling that MVP median doesn't have a position lined up (op said they were 2Ls). MVP median had a full OCI to land something and didn't - firm will recognize this. T20 may also have struck out, but also had significantly fewer opportunities to land something during OCIBach-City wrote:I'm with these guys. Regardless of which candidate is better, this will be more helpful to the T20 friend. Median at MVP will do finemisterjames wrote:sametrebekismyhero wrote:YepRaceJudicata wrote:Agree.whats an updog wrote:I'd give it to the T20 guy because he probably has less of a chance of getting a job anywhere than your median t14 friend.
- JenDarby
- Posts: 17362
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:02 am
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
lol are you trying to imply firms care about the law school of a hired junior associate when they bill clients? as if a client might google the junior doc reviewer to make sure they're t14 not t20 because heaven forbid they spend money on such a lawyer.cron1834 wrote:Firm likes to bill out T14 people more than T20. Might as well back the horse likely to win. Vote is telling here.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- trebekismyhero
- Posts: 1095
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 5:26 pm
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
Exactly, that is ridiculous and stupidJenDarby wrote:lol are you trying to imply firms care about the law school of a hired junior associate when they bill clients? as if a client might google the junior doc reviewer to make sure they're t14 not t20 because heaven forbid they spend money on such a lawyer.cron1834 wrote:Firm likes to bill out T14 people more than T20. Might as well back the horse likely to win. Vote is telling here.
-
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 1:35 am
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
This. I'd argue there's little difference in the ability between these candidates. That said, I think clients would probably prefer school over a latin honor at a t20.DCfilterDC wrote:True, but I also don't think there's a meaningful distinction in ability between someone at median and someone in top 1/3.Clemenceau wrote:This poll will probably be skewed because this site very likely has more median t14ers than top 1/3 t20ers.
- elendinel
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:29 pm
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
In some fields/locations clients will care, yes. It depends on what type of clients you work with and the degree to which the client is exposed to you as an associate.JenDarby wrote:lol are you trying to imply firms care about the law school of a hired junior associate when they bill clients? as if a client might google the junior doc reviewer to make sure they're t14 not t20 because heaven forbid they spend money on such a lawyer.cron1834 wrote:Firm likes to bill out T14 people more than T20. Might as well back the horse likely to win. Vote is telling here.
I've even seen some clients pass over an attorney with 3+ years of solid experience because they didn't like where the attorney's degree came from. It's stupid, but it does happen.
- JenDarby
- Posts: 17362
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:02 am
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
Yes, of course it will happen to some extent, especially perhaps in more boutique or niche practice areas and firms. What else might happen is that a client is from CA and wants the UCLA or USC grad over the Duke grad. Or maybe they're from Texas and want the UT grad over the Northwestern grad.elendinel wrote:In some fields/locations clients will care, yes. It depends on what type of clients you work with and the degree to which the client is exposed to you as an associate.JenDarby wrote:lol are you trying to imply firms care about the law school of a hired junior associate when they bill clients? as if a client might google the junior doc reviewer to make sure they're t14 not t20 because heaven forbid they spend money on such a lawyer.cron1834 wrote:Firm likes to bill out T14 people more than T20. Might as well back the horse likely to win. Vote is telling here.
I've even seen some clients pass over an attorney with 3+ years of solid experience because they didn't like where the attorney's degree came from. It's stupid, but it does happen.
I graduated in 2014 and still had to pull up the rankings to see where schools are in that range. This isn't the difference between Harvard and William and Mary. T14 to T20 can have arguments for or against either school based on personal preference. So no, I don't think that biglaw firm clients are generally going to prefer to pay for the t14 over t20 law students (esp considering t14 generally denotes the bottom half of that range).
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2016 3:48 am
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
Personally, I would back the one I feel would be more likely to do the actual job well, especially if my name was attached to the individual. If they were more or less equal in that capacity I would back the one more likely to interview well as I want my name attached to successful recommendations.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2015 12:34 am
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
Assign one to heads, one to tails, and flip a coin a bunch of times to decide.
-
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:47 pm
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
There has to be SOME other way to distinguish these two. There is no meaningful conclusion to draw from the information provided herein.
That said, if pressed on this under the incredible notion that they are exactly the same otherwise, I'd probably go with the T20 guy. A lot of qualified people attend lower-ranked schools for that sweet scholarship dough, and I'd rather have someone who excels among very smart people than someone who is average among people slightly smarter than very smart.
And lol at myself over "excels" being judged by law school grades. Truly, look at other factors here. Did either one ever work for a living? Writing samples? Personality?
That said, if pressed on this under the incredible notion that they are exactly the same otherwise, I'd probably go with the T20 guy. A lot of qualified people attend lower-ranked schools for that sweet scholarship dough, and I'd rather have someone who excels among very smart people than someone who is average among people slightly smarter than very smart.
And lol at myself over "excels" being judged by law school grades. Truly, look at other factors here. Did either one ever work for a living? Writing samples? Personality?
-
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:05 pm
Re: Which applicant do you like better?
By the time this person has been at the firm long enough to see if they can "do the actual job well", OP will likely be long gone from the firm.AJordan wrote:Personally, I would back the one I feel would be more likely to do the actual job well, especially if my name was attached to the individual. If they were more or less equal in that capacity I would back the one more likely to interview well as I want my name attached to successful recommendations.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login