"Top Partners at Kirkland & Ellis See Cuts to Equity Shares" Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- nothingtosee
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 12:08 am
- Mad Hatter
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2012 10:38 pm
Re: "Top Partners at Kirkland & Ellis See Cuts to Equity Shares"
Only $11.1M? THE HORROR.
-
- Posts: 591
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 12:02 pm
Re: "Top Partners at Kirkland & Ellis See Cuts to Equity Shares"
oh what a bloodbathMad Hatter wrote:Only $11.1M? THE HORROR.
-
- Posts: 591
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 12:02 pm
Re: "Top Partners at Kirkland & Ellis See Cuts to Equity Shares"
also, i'm sure k&e thought that if a market-leading firm such as pearson specter litt is changing its profit allocations (shifting emphasis from contingency fees to billable hour fees), then it damn well better follow suit(s)
- LaLiLuLeLo
- Posts: 949
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 11:54 am
Re: "Top Partners at Kirkland & Ellis See Cuts to Equity Shares"
Calling getting your compensation trimmed by a few hundred thousand out of several million is hilariously out of touch.Abbie Doobie wrote:oh what a bloodbathMad Hatter wrote:Only $11.1M? THE HORROR.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:22 am
Re: "Top Partners at Kirkland & Ellis See Cuts to Equity Shares"
inb4 Kirkland is not on Pearson Specter's level. They are more on par with Paul Weiss.Abbie Doobie wrote:also, i'm sure k&e thought that if a market-leading firm such as pearson specter litt is changing its profit allocations (shifting emphasis from contingency fees to billable hour fees), then it damn well better follow suit(s)
-
- Posts: 591
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2014 12:02 pm
Re: "Top Partners at Kirkland & Ellis See Cuts to Equity Shares"
in all seriousness, i think that reallocating equity partner profits is a smart move that will really ensure that partner compensation at k&e, on balance, remains in balance
-
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:22 am
Re: "Top Partners at Kirkland & Ellis See Cuts to Equity Shares"
Given their high profile (and probably expensive) hires, I'm impressed they haven't had to trim more.
- polareagle
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: "Top Partners at Kirkland & Ellis See Cuts to Equity Shares"
Abbie Doobie wrote:in all seriousness, i think that reallocating equity partner profits is a smart move that will really ensure that partner compensation at k&e, on balance, remains in balance