(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
stoopkid13
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2014 5:31 am
Post
by stoopkid13 » Wed Sep 21, 2016 11:04 am
Facing mounting partner frustration at the firm’s stalled growth, Shearman & Sterling could decide as soon as today on a possible plan to demote some equity partners in an effort to refocus business on priority practices and lift profits, according to a report
https://bol.bna.com/wake-up-call-shearm ... e-profits/
Doesn't seem to be more info right now, at least publicly.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432538
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 21, 2016 12:46 pm
I'm going there next summer. What does this actually mean firm-health wise?
-
mvp99
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:00 pm
Post
by mvp99 » Wed Sep 21, 2016 12:49 pm
hope these partners accept the demotion and the rainmakers don't leave. If they left, I would be really worried.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432538
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 21, 2016 12:56 pm
Doesn't seem like they have really finalized on what to do yet. I have heard that their international strategy was haphazard and a bunch of profitable partners left in the early 2000's because they were tired of bankrolling it.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
rustyburger2
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 5:12 pm
Post
by rustyburger2 » Wed Sep 21, 2016 1:05 pm
mvp99 wrote:hope these partners accept the demotion and the rainmakers don't leave. If they left, I would be really worried.
Well the rainmakers aren't the ones being demoted. Why would they leave?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432538
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 21, 2016 1:10 pm
the reason they are doing this is because rainmakers thought their draws were getting dragged down by unprofitable partners. if the unprofitable partners don't leave, the rainmakers will go somewhere else to get their raise.
Last edited by
Anonymous User on Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432538
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 21, 2016 1:14 pm
Do the unprofitable partners have a say though? I don't really know how demotion works - do they have to agree to it?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432538
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 21, 2016 1:18 pm
the article said something about 75% of partners needing to agree in order for demotions to take effect.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
Pokemon
- Posts: 3528
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:58 pm
Post
by Pokemon » Wed Sep 21, 2016 1:40 pm
I do not think the demotion itself makes the firm weaker, but the demotion can be a symptom of other weaknesses.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432538
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 21, 2016 7:50 pm
a TTT in even further decline. glad i turned down my offer there. volk and some of the other rainmakers left in early 2000s and the firm never really recovered. recession hit them hard too and didn't have a countercylical practice like litigation to capitalize on the downturn.
-
Wild Card
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2014 6:48 pm
Post
by Wild Card » Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:20 pm
2007: V15
2017: V50
2018: V100
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
bearsfan23
- Posts: 1754
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:19 pm
Post
by bearsfan23 » Wed Sep 21, 2016 9:03 pm
How exactly do you demote a partner?
Do they just go back to being an associate or something?
-
EncyclopediaOrange
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 12:30 am
Post
by EncyclopediaOrange » Wed Sep 21, 2016 9:08 pm
bearsfan23 wrote:How exactly do you demote a partner?
Do they just go back to being an associate or something?
I assume they would just "de-equitize" them and have them be salary partners.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432538
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 21, 2016 9:09 pm
i dont think im allowed to post paywalled articles here, but the gist is:
shearman has underperforming partners and practice areas and the ones that are profitable are complaining that they're pulling money from the pot w/o contributing much, so they want to de-equitize them. partners in US and asia will most likely be affected. shearman recently lost their anti trust partners to quinn and then 3 top m&a partners to paul hastings. unknown how many partners will be affected if the demotion happens. firm currently has 162 equity and 26 non-equity partners. thats about it.
-
mvp99
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:00 pm
Post
by mvp99 » Wed Sep 21, 2016 9:09 pm
bearsfan23 wrote:How exactly do you demote a partner?
Do they just go back to being an associate or something?
I think partners get de-equitized and receive a salary instead of gettif a share of the profits
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
rustyburger2
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 5:12 pm
Post
by rustyburger2 » Wed Sep 21, 2016 9:10 pm
bearsfan23 wrote:How exactly do you demote a partner?
Do they just go back to being an associate or something?
I'm not quite sure of the exact ritual but I imagine there's some kind of holy water and a crucifix involved.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432538
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 21, 2016 9:13 pm
Anonymous User wrote:
3 top m&a partners to paul hastings.
From the SF office right? They used to have a nice little office out there. Who do they even have in the Bay Area nowadays.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432538
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 21, 2016 9:16 pm
Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:
3 top m&a partners to paul hastings.
From the SF office right? They used to have a nice little office out there. Who do they even have in the Bay Area nowadays.
yes, from the SF office. i have no idea. i didnt even know they had an SF office.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432538
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 21, 2016 10:30 pm
Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:
3 top m&a partners to paul hastings.
From the SF office right? They used to have a nice little office out there. Who do they even have in the Bay Area nowadays.
yes, from the SF office. i have no idea. i didnt even know they had an SF office.
They used to have quite a few rainmakers in SF who have since moved on to different firms in the area.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432538
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:08 am
Funny, I joined this site tonight as I am applying to Law school for Fall 2017. Just browsing through the topics and saw Shearman and Sterling in the thread title and had to see what it was about.
My mother is a partner at S&S. I would be so bold as to call her a "rainmaker" but she's a decently sized name in New York.
I wouldn't believe everything you read.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432538
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:48 am
Anonymous User wrote:Funny, I joined this site tonight as I am applying to Law school for Fall 2017. Just browsing through the topics and saw Shearman and Sterling in the thread title and had to see what it was about.
My mother is a partner at S&S. I would be so bold as to call her a "rainmaker" but she's a decently sized name in New York.
I wouldn't believe everything you read.
What's there to not believe? The firm confirmed it all.
-
Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Post
by Johann » Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:50 am
Anonymous User wrote:Funny, I joined this site tonight as I am applying to Law school for Fall 2017. Just browsing through the topics and saw Shearman and Sterling in the thread title and had to see what it was about.
My mother is a partner at S&S. I would be so bold as to call her a "rainmaker" but she's a decently sized name in New York.
I wouldn't believe everything you read.
i wouldnt believe everything mommy tells you either about business. but mainly, this is obviously flame because no law firm partner is recommending their kid go to law school.
-
cron1834
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Post
by cron1834 » Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:55 am
Anonymous User wrote:Funny, I joined this site tonight as I am applying to Law school for Fall 2017. Just browsing through the topics and saw Shearman and Sterling in the thread title and had to see what it was about.
My mother is a partner at S&S. I would be so bold as to call her a "rainmaker" but she's a decently sized name in New York.
I wouldn't believe everything you read.
Previous partners getting poached is already in the history books, and the firm already confirmed this current story. Get a life.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
