What to look for when deciding between firms Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 431119
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
What to look for when deciding between firms
Looking for some advice. I'm sitting on a few V-50 offers and would like to know what data points I should look for before deciding.
Should the focus be on Chambers Bands? Client list? Lock-step?
Or is purely a gut decision based on where you thought you "clicked"
Should the focus be on Chambers Bands? Client list? Lock-step?
Or is purely a gut decision based on where you thought you "clicked"
-
- Posts: 431119
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What to look for when deciding between firms
Sounds cliché, but mostly the people (whether or not you can envision yourself working with them) and a combination of strength in practice areas you're interested in (so chambers band rankings)
-
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:00 pm
Re: What to look for when deciding between firms
IMO, think about you. What do you want to get out of the firm? This usually means mainly training rather than money. Does the firm deal with what you're interested in? How are tasks assigned? Free market v. non free market and everything in between. Is there a rotation system? I think pigeonholing could be one of the worst things that could happen to you if your really don't like what you do.
-
- Posts: 431119
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What to look for when deciding between firms
OP here.
What about PPP, or Partner:Associate ratio? Does that matter at all?
What about PPP, or Partner:Associate ratio? Does that matter at all?
- jkpolk
- Posts: 1236
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:44 am
Re: What to look for when deciding between firms
My personal opinion is that PPP/Leverage should not matter when looking at a firm as an entry level. Leverage cuts both ways in terms of whether it's "good" or not and doesn't speak to typical staffing and isn't consistent across groups. You should care about a firm's financial health but PPP isn't a great proxy for that.Anonymous User wrote:OP here.
What about PPP, or Partner:Associate ratio? Does that matter at all?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431119
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What to look for when deciding between firms
Is chambers band rating more meaningful than vault specific area ranking? Specifically I am interested in IP litigation and prosecution rankings. There are also corporate counsel, etc a variety of rankings out there.
Also, should I consider ranking nationwide or regionally as well. Vault has those regional ranking as well.
Also, should I consider ranking nationwide or regionally as well. Vault has those regional ranking as well.
-
- Posts: 431119
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What to look for when deciding between firms
What do you mean by free market v. non free market?mvp99 wrote:IMO, think about you. What do you want to get out of the firm? This usually means mainly training rather than money. Does the firm deal with what you're interested in? How are tasks assigned? Free market v. non free market and everything in between. Is there a rotation system? I think pigeonholing could be one of the worst things that could happen to you if your really don't like what you do.
-
- Posts: 431119
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What to look for when deciding between firms
Having recently lateraled, these are the things I would focus on personally if I could do it again:
Practice group strength - what do you want to do? Just because a firm has an A+ reputation generally doesn't mean that they'll have the type of work that you want to do. Chambers is a good start, though not perfect.
Free market vs Top-down staffing: IMO free market staffing is awful, though it's hard to know whether you'll feel the same way without actually being at a firm.
And of course the usual things (compensation, hours expectations, "fit," general financial performance, etc.)
I would not look at partnership profits, partnership structure, or partnership chances at all except to the extent those things bleed into other categories.
Practice group strength - what do you want to do? Just because a firm has an A+ reputation generally doesn't mean that they'll have the type of work that you want to do. Chambers is a good start, though not perfect.
Free market vs Top-down staffing: IMO free market staffing is awful, though it's hard to know whether you'll feel the same way without actually being at a firm.
And of course the usual things (compensation, hours expectations, "fit," general financial performance, etc.)
I would not look at partnership profits, partnership structure, or partnership chances at all except to the extent those things bleed into other categories.
-
- Posts: 431119
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: What to look for when deciding between firms
So much this. I thought free market was going to be great. I thought that I'd have my pick of people to work with, and that I wouldn't get stuck working for awful people because I could control my own destiny. Well that only really works if your firm is so busy that every associate is indispensable. Instead, I find myself always fighting to stay busy and stressing because I don't know where the next assignment will come from or whether work will dry up.Anonymous User wrote:Having recently lateraled, these are the things I would focus on personally if I could do it again:
Free market vs Top-down staffing: IMO free market staffing is awful, though it's hard to know whether you'll feel the same way without actually being at a firm.
I'd imagine if we were not free market I'd just do the work assigned to me. That would reduce so much stress.