in-house ibank vs pe Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
brightstep
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 4:01 pm
in-house ibank vs pe
I'm a 4th year m&a associate looking to go-inhouse. The jobs recruiters reach out to me about tend to be either investment banks or private equity firms. Does anyone here have any insight as to the differences in going either of those routes, both from a day-to-day perspective and a compensation perspective? Would love to hear your thoughts, particularly if you've had similar options and chose one of those routes. Thanks!
-
itbdvorm
- Posts: 1710
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 9:09 am
Re: in-house ibank vs pe
I would say "where" matters much less than "what"
In-house compliance at PE could be terrible, in-house M&A advisory counsel at bank could be great. and vice-versa. figure out what you like about what you're doing about your current gig and what you don't like, and look for a specific job that sounds better
In-house compliance at PE could be terrible, in-house M&A advisory counsel at bank could be great. and vice-versa. figure out what you like about what you're doing about your current gig and what you don't like, and look for a specific job that sounds better
