Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- smaug
- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
Emma. wrote:smaug wrote:lol
- TLSModBot
- Posts: 14835
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
smaug wrote:lol
-
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:22 pm
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
Anyone making decisions based on this thread or even real moves in vault rankings is deserving of falling hard for this.runinthefront wrote:There may be some lurkers (i.e. Rising 2Ls) who don't get the joke , so idk how funny this is especially in light of OCI season coming up
- Single-Malt-Liquor
- Posts: 1450
- Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 4:49 pm
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
Who hasn't been in position where they want to do corporate work in a humane environment but just felt the pull of Quinn's Vault ranking?onionz wrote:Anyone making decisions based on this thread or even real moves in vault rankings is deserving of falling hard for this.runinthefront wrote:There may be some lurkers (i.e. Rising 2Ls) who don't get the joke , so idk how funny this is especially in light of OCI season coming up
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 11:03 am
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
Clearly I don't understand the joke.
Last edited by imalreadyamember? on Wed Jun 15, 2016 10:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
-
- Posts: 8258
- Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 10:36 am
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings

Last edited by Danger Zone on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Br3v
- Posts: 4290
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
Everyone freaking out in this thread is hilarious. When it comes to Vault remember the "rule of primes"' is all that matters. If your firm "falls" but stays above the next prime you're fine. For example a firm that falls from 14 to 18 is fine as that's safely within the 13-17 (V137 range). Obviously if your firm falls from 18 to 20 (aka a V1719 becoming a V1923) that's going to be pretty problematic, but the statistical likelihood of such a drastic change is small.
- jingosaur
- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
I assume the new rankings are just the order in which firms went to 180.
- Single-Malt-Liquor
- Posts: 1450
- Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 4:49 pm
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
That would be incredibly stupid. It's based off analysis of last year's OCI bid lists with higher weight given to those with higher GPAs & School rankings.jingosaur wrote:I assume the new rankings are just the order in which firms went to 180.
Edit: I said that to be funny but then cringed when I realized that the correlation might be really high.
- Emma.
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 pm
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
Inception!smaug wrote:Emma. wrote:smaug wrote:lol
-
- Posts: 431721
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
I'm just gna take the bait cuz I'm bored anyways.. any movement within V10?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 2014
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
Totally true - this is why people are generally hyper focused on Skadden and S&C's posturing on a year to year basisBr3v wrote:Everyone freaking out in this thread is hilarious. When it comes to Vault remember the "rule of primes"' is all that matters. If your firm "falls" but stays above the next prime you're fine. For example a firm that falls from 14 to 18 is fine as that's safely within the 13-17 (V137 range). Obviously if your firm falls from 18 to 20 (aka a V1719 becoming a V1923) that's going to be pretty problematic, but the statistical likelihood of such a drastic change is small.
-
- Posts: 431721
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
Ropes is #1 in the regional rankings for Boston in 2016 despite being lower than WH on the main rankings. OP said he looked at the regional ranking for Boston. I'm guessing WH passed Ropes for #1 in Boston.Single-Malt-Liquor wrote:I can't believe I'm joining in this. If there's a new number one in Boston, that would mean that Ropes passed Wilmer. Also, Wilmer would be the more likely candidate for a tumble as their corporate group got raided by Latham a few years ago and hasn't fully recovered.skri65 wrote:Based on the Boston comment, I'm guessing Ropes is the V30 that tumbled. Wonder why..
/self
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
I've never heard of this rule. Frankly, it sounds like something you made up. Not cool. As runinthefront points out, rising 2Ls could make career-altering decisions based on this information.Br3v wrote:Everyone freaking out in this thread is hilarious. When it comes to Vault remember the "rule of primes"' is all that matters. If your firm "falls" but stays above the next prime you're fine. For example a firm that falls from 14 to 18 is fine as that's safely within the 13-17 (V137 range). Obviously if your firm falls from 18 to 20 (aka a V1719 becoming a V1923) that's going to be pretty problematic, but the statistical likelihood of such a drastic change is small.
-
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 11:03 am
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
So I clearly don't understand some kind of inside joke that's happening. Is the joke the entire thing (i.e. you haven't actually seen rankings and you're making it all up) or is the joke just making fun of people caring about Vault and speculating about who/why?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Single-Malt-Liquor
- Posts: 1450
- Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 4:49 pm
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
You're obviously missing the point.imalreadyamember? wrote:So I clearly don't understand some kind of inside joke that's happening. Is the joke the entire thing (i.e. you haven't actually seen rankings and you're making it all up) or is the joke just making fun of people caring about Vault and speculating about who/why?
- WinterComing
- Posts: 729
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2015 11:10 am
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
Allow me to blow your mind: It's both.imalreadyamember? wrote:So I clearly don't understand some kind of inside joke that's happening. Is the joke the entire thing (i.e. you haven't actually seen rankings and you're making it all up) or is the joke just making fun of people caring about Vault and speculating about who/why?
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
Vault has no meaning, and its fun to troll people who are foolish enough to care, so of course its speculation but more importantly even if rpupkin had seen the 'rankings', it would be irrelevant, but some people on TLS will take it very seriouslyimalreadyamember? wrote:So I clearly don't understand some kind of inside joke that's happening. Is the joke the entire thing (i.e. you haven't actually seen rankings and you're making it all up) or is the joke just making fun of people caring about Vault and speculating about who/why?
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
Sorry accidental anonAnonymous User wrote:I'm just gna take the bait cuz I'm bored anyways.. any movement within V10?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- RareExports
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2014 4:12 pm
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
How many V18 firms have fallen to the dreaded V22?
- Br3v
- Posts: 4290
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
OP did you get to see which quotes were selected for "the buzz" section?
Obviously only concerned about V42 and up
Obviously only concerned about V42 and up
- mrs.miawallace
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 6:41 am
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
I mean, in kids' mind ropes has been number 1 in boston for so long. wilmer is this prestigious litigation firm who has been smashed by even smaller sized firm litigation wise.
- PeanutsNJam
- Posts: 4670
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm
Re: Leaked: 2017 Vault Rankings
Shame on everyone who ruined this thread by lolling and pointing out the joke.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login