Deal/merger litigation Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432542
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Deal/merger litigation

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Feb 20, 2016 4:31 pm

Can anyone tell me what practicing in deal/merger/takeover litigation is like? Thinking about moving into that practice. It sounds exciting but there's not much information out there about working in it vs. general commercial lit. I imagine it's fast-paced, minimal discovery but what else?

TTTooKewl

New
Posts: 96
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:03 pm

Re: Deal/merger litigation

Post by TTTooKewl » Mon Feb 22, 2016 6:43 pm

I'm a student, and I don't know much, but I'll share what I know.

There's a few different types of deal litigation, each of which differ significantly. There's the activist side, like waging proxy contests in connection with a tender offer or, more common in recent years, in connection with influencing corporate policy (typically by hedge funds holding significant minority interests). Proxy contests in this context sometimes result in litigation. I'm not sure if this is a dedicated practice area. There's the plaintiff attorneys in Delaware who extort settlements from every public deal, although recent data suggests this field of law is drying up. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/23/busin ... zzled.html. Minimal or no discovery here, because the cases settle very quickly. And of course there's the defense side of the extortion plaintiffs.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432542
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Deal/merger litigation

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Feb 23, 2016 12:28 am

The minimal discovery assumption ITT is dead wrong. As a junior M&A lit associate, 75% of your job will be spent on expedited discovery in advance of hearings on motions for injunctive relief prior to a short-close deal (e.g., collecting and reviewing ~150,000 documents in advance of the PI briefing deadline one month from yesterday).

Anonymous User
Posts: 432542
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Deal/merger litigation

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:37 am

Anonymous User wrote:The minimal discovery assumption ITT is dead wrong. As a junior M&A lit associate, 75% of your job will be spent on expedited discovery in advance of hearings on motions for injunctive relief prior to a short-close deal (e.g., collecting and reviewing ~150,000 documents in advance of the PI briefing deadline one month from yesterday).
This. M+A lit is fun for partners or for the senior associates that work directly with them (a lot of client contact, interesting war stories, get to see the business side of things somewhat more than your average lit partner) but for juniors it is discovery hell. One month is charitable for a lot of Delaware judges.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”