Gibson (LA) v. Susman (LA) Forum

Anonymous User · Post by **Anonymous User** » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:29 pm

Thoughts? Think that I want to practice at a law firm as long as they'll have me, but obviously might not have the stomach for it long term.

Elston Gunn · Post by **Elston Gunn** » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:31 pm

Are you post-clerkship or something? If you're a 2L, the answer here is both.

rpupkin · Post by **rpupkin** » Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:50 pm

Have you visited the firms' respective offices? Have you done any research at all on these places? I mean, you should know that these are two very, very different offices in so many ways (e.g., size, culture, type of work). If you want meaningful "thoughts" from the crowd, why not tell us a bit about what you value and what you're thinking at this point.

WheninLaw · Post by **WheninLaw** » Mon Sep 21, 2015 11:25 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Thoughts? Think that I want to practice at a law firm as long as they'll have me, but obviously might not have the stomach for it long term.

Given your question, it's hard for me to believe you have an offer from both places.

jbagelboy · Post by **jbagelboy** » Tue Sep 22, 2015 12:45 am

You know that susman SA offers are not summer long, right? You would split your summer between the two firms. If Gibson doesn't let you split with another LA firm, then you split with a different office, but I've seen Susman CC/other LA firm splits before.

Gibson (LA) v. Susman (LA) Forum

Pick:

Gibson (LA) v. Susman (LA)

Re: Gibson (LA) v. Susman (LA)

Re: Gibson (LA) v. Susman (LA)

Re: Gibson (LA) v. Susman (LA)

Re: Gibson (LA) v. Susman (LA)

Register now to search topics and post comments!