Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Which is WORST reason for no-offer, i.e. recommend NOT hiring the candidate -(Pls see bold below)

The firm wasn't the right "fit"
16
36%
Poor work product
12
27%
ATL-worthy story of 1 very bad night partying WAY too hard at firm event
16
36%
 
Total votes: 44

ballouttacontrol

Silver
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 9:00 pm

Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by ballouttacontrol » Tue Sep 15, 2015 9:58 pm

MY QUESTION to practicing lawyers

Rank these in terms of which is the WORST, e.g., #1 you are LEAST likely to recommend an offer, and #3 you are LEAST likely to recommend an offer
  • The firm wasn't the right "fit"
  • Poor work product
  • ATL-worthy story of 1 very bad night partying WAY too hard at firm event
[/b]
Last edited by ballouttacontrol on Wed May 24, 2017 12:45 pm, edited 4 times in total.

User avatar
84651846190

Gold
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by 84651846190 » Tue Sep 15, 2015 10:21 pm

A few questions:

1. How tall are you?

2. How much do you squat?

3. What law school / grades?

4. Are you a 3L now? Graduate?

ballouttacontrol

Silver
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 9:00 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by ballouttacontrol » Tue Sep 15, 2015 10:28 pm

.
Last edited by ballouttacontrol on Wed Sep 16, 2015 12:12 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
smaug

Diamond
Posts: 13972
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by smaug » Tue Sep 15, 2015 10:40 pm

This is a lot of work for flame, so you're either crazy or crazy for putting this much work into it.

Shine on you crazy cat.

ballouttacontrol

Silver
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 9:00 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by ballouttacontrol » Tue Sep 15, 2015 10:47 pm

.
Last edited by ballouttacontrol on Wed May 24, 2017 12:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
smaug

Diamond
Posts: 13972
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by smaug » Tue Sep 15, 2015 10:49 pm

Tell us more about the man behind the keyboard. Is this something you planned out, or are you just winging it? I enjoyed the IP RESUME bit. That was fun.

ballouttacontrol

Silver
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 9:00 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by ballouttacontrol » Tue Sep 15, 2015 10:56 pm

smaug wrote:Tell us more about the man behind the keyboard. Is this something you planned out, or are you just winging it? I enjoyed the IP RESUME bit. That was fun.
Jealous? I'm guessing not, but nor I of you.

So thanks for stopping by

User avatar
smaug

Diamond
Posts: 13972
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by smaug » Tue Sep 15, 2015 10:56 pm

I'm very jealous of you. I wish I had what it takes to be a high effort troll but I always fuck it up. :oops:


TEACH ME.

ballouttacontrol

Silver
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 9:00 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by ballouttacontrol » Tue Sep 15, 2015 11:01 pm

Dude, I'm sorry I don't have 6000 fucking posts. And I've been on TLS for a long time but I wasn't going to post on that account, which I have openly messaged my classmates from. I understand this is against the rules, so if warranted, Mods please delete my thread and other post.

OTOH, even normal fun people can feel like they want to post on an anonymous forum sometimes, for possible a similar reason you're here instead of talking to people in real life

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


FSK

Platinum
Posts: 8058
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 2:47 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by FSK » Tue Sep 15, 2015 11:03 pm

This is flame because the details don't line up. Top 5-10 schools, above median in the last hiring cycle, and you didn't got to a 100% offer firm, AND you somehow managed to get 5 Callbacks in 3L OCI? Doesn't make any sense.
Last edited by FSK on Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

ballouttacontrol

Silver
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 9:00 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by ballouttacontrol » Tue Sep 15, 2015 11:13 pm

.
Last edited by ballouttacontrol on Wed Sep 16, 2015 12:11 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
smaug

Diamond
Posts: 13972
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by smaug » Tue Sep 15, 2015 11:30 pm

How do I become a top IP candidate masterman.

ballouttacontrol

Silver
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 9:00 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by ballouttacontrol » Tue Sep 15, 2015 11:39 pm

smaug wrote:How do I become a top IP candidate masterman.
Whatever dude, there's a reason almost every single law firm website has a job posting "Intellectual Property Group - EE/CS background or similar"

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


ballouttacontrol

Silver
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 9:00 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by ballouttacontrol » Tue Sep 15, 2015 11:41 pm

On-topic though, I'm really surprised at the poll results.

I would have thought work product would be the worst, or that more just in IP? I have heard of people getting no offered from even 95% offer IP firms for bad work product. Or could be OLs I suppose

User avatar
anyriotgirl

Platinum
Posts: 8349
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:54 am

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by anyriotgirl » Tue Sep 15, 2015 11:52 pm

so what did you do?

ballouttacontrol

Silver
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 9:00 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by ballouttacontrol » Wed Sep 16, 2015 12:17 pm

Removed the personal stuff bc I didn't come here to defend myself from trolls.

Anyone have any feedback on the actual question though?

User avatar
Clearly

Gold
Posts: 4189
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by Clearly » Wed Sep 16, 2015 12:20 pm

I think you guys are too fast to call troll here. Why is it so hard to believe someone got no offered for partying?

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


jhett

Bronze
Posts: 336
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:36 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by jhett » Wed Sep 16, 2015 12:45 pm

Clearly wrote:I think you guys are too fast to call troll here. Why is it so hard to believe someone got no offered for partying?
Because OP's now-deleted story was embellished with a bunch of irrelevant details about hanging out with hot girls, partying and drinking like an animal all the time, and being a "rockstar" summer. It wasn't even a humblebrag... it was straight brag.

He could have posed the same question with far fewer details (that serve no purpose other than to out him if the story is true).

Therefore, OP is either a troll or needs rehab.

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse

Diamond
Posts: 29293
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by A. Nony Mouse » Wed Sep 16, 2015 12:51 pm

If OP isn't trolling... The fact that people who read the story think you might need rehab may explain why it would not be a good explanation to give for a no-offer.

Also, poor fit and work product issues are both vague enough that they could be understood as firms making an excuse (maybe), but being unable to control your partying in a work context is a completely concrete example of really bad judgment or substance abuse issues, neither of which inspires confidence in this super risk-averse field.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432162
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 16, 2015 12:53 pm

Work product worst to tell people
Partying 2nd
Fit 1st

Fit can be portrayed multiple ways - practice groups, location, future of firm, etc.

Partying is bad but maybe you spin it as you've learned your lesson

Work product is telling firms that you suck at your job

ballouttacontrol

Silver
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 9:00 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by ballouttacontrol » Wed Sep 16, 2015 12:55 pm

.
Last edited by ballouttacontrol on Wed May 24, 2017 12:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
star fox

Diamond
Posts: 20790
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:13 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by star fox » Wed Sep 16, 2015 12:56 pm

Clearly wrote:I think you guys are too fast to call troll here. Why is it so hard to believe someone got no offered for partying?
Well the username "ballaouttacontrol" was a pretty good sign of a flame.

User avatar
smaug

Diamond
Posts: 13972
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by smaug » Wed Sep 16, 2015 1:04 pm

So pretty much you're claiming you were a no offered Desmarais summer right?

Teach us how to ball like you.

User avatar
OneMoreLawHopeful

Silver
Posts: 1191
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 6:21 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by OneMoreLawHopeful » Wed Sep 16, 2015 4:48 pm

Do you the posters calling flame not remember this?

http://coed.com/2015/07/01/35-year-old- ... -and-blow/

Friends of mine at Latham have confirmed many of the details (while maintaining that others are overblown), so I'm willing to believe it's remotely possible that this is the same guy.

notgreat

Silver
Posts: 626
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:24 pm

Re: Practicing Lawyers' Opinions Please - Rank in terms of badness

Post by notgreat » Wed Sep 16, 2015 6:05 pm

Are you sure it wasn't just that the office didn't have enough work/financial reasons for no offering you? My understanding is that sometimes when that is the case the firm will point to thing like work product/fit/partying to explain the no offer, when it was really that they didn't have the work. If it's possible that is what happened that is what I would say.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”