Litigation in Silicon Valley Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
User avatar
bruinfan10

Silver
Posts: 658
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:25 am

Litigation in Silicon Valley

Post by bruinfan10 » Tue Sep 08, 2015 5:08 pm

I was curious if any SF/SV litigators could speak to the pros and cons of working as a litigator in a big firm's SV office, compared to working in SF. Gibson, Latham, OMM, etc have SV offices that are predominantly corporate but also have small securities or IP practice groups: one or two partners and a handful of litigation associates supporting them.

I'm trying to get a sense of the negatives of working as a litigator in an SV office, i.e. would the small size of those practice groups keep you from escaping bad partners or finding enough work, vs the positives, i.e. would the scarcity of associates supporting each partner allow those associates to engage in more substantive work more quickly because there are so few of them to go around? Any thoughts on that type of working arrangement in SV litigation would be appreciated.
Last edited by bruinfan10 on Tue Sep 08, 2015 5:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: Litigation in Silicon Valley

Post by rpupkin » Tue Sep 08, 2015 5:13 pm

bruinfan10 wrote:Would the small size of those practice groups have drawbacks in that you couldn't escape bad partners, and would they have the benefit of additional substantive work because there are so few associates to go around?
I think that's a fair assessment.

As you've probably figured out, don't go to one of these places unless you're up for lots of patent lit. If you're a junior litigation associate in the SV office of a place like Gibson and Latham, you're going to have a very hard time avoiding patent lit. If the firm tells you otherwise, don't believe them.

User avatar
bruinfan10

Silver
Posts: 658
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:25 am

Re: Litigation in Silicon Valley

Post by bruinfan10 » Tue Sep 08, 2015 5:15 pm

rpupkin wrote:
bruinfan10 wrote:Would the small size of those practice groups have drawbacks in that you couldn't escape bad partners, and would they have the benefit of additional substantive work because there are so few associates to go around?
I think that's a fair assessment.

As you've probably figured out, don't go to one of these places unless you're up for lots of patent lit. If you're a junior litigation associate in the SV office of a place like Gibson and Latham, you're going to have a very hard time avoiding patent lit. If the firm tells you otherwise, don't believe them.
That makes sense. I hadn't considered working in SV, but a friend out there told me that his SV office really needed securities litigators, and I have no idea what working in a super small SV practice group would be like.

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”