Leverage and Substantive Work Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Leverage and Substantive Work
If an office has more partners than associates, is that a pretty good sign that you're going to get good work?
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: Leverage and Substantive Work
depends on the firm. just post the firm if you are posting anony.
- los blancos
- Posts: 8397
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: Leverage and Substantive Work
Yep. In theory the answer is yes, but sometimes upside-down pyramid-shaped firms can result in partners hoarding work if they're not doing so hot on the business development front.JohannDeMann wrote:depends on the firm.
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Leverage and Substantive Work
In my experience, there is a much stronger correlation between lean staffing and getting substantive work than there is between leverage and getting substantive work. We have a group in my office that is very partner-heavy and does big-ticket cases. It's not a good group for young associates - the cases are big enough to staff a ton of people on, and the partners (and senior associates) gobble up all the fun and interesting work. By contrast, we also have partners who primarily work on smaller matters for more cost-conscious clients. They typically prefer to staff matters with no more than 1-2 associates, and you tend to get very cool work (depositions, brief-writing, etc.) from those cases.
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Leverage and Substantive Work
Anonymous User wrote:In my experience, there is a much stronger correlation between lean staffing and getting substantive work than there is between leverage and getting substantive work. We have a group in my office that is very partner-heavy and does big-ticket cases. It's not a good group for young associates - the cases are big enough to staff a ton of people on, and the partners (and senior associates) gobble up all the fun and interesting work. By contrast, we also have partners who primarily work on smaller matters for more cost-conscious clients. They typically prefer to staff matters with no more than 1-2 associates, and you tend to get very cool work (depositions, brief-writing, etc.) from those cases.
So, asking associates at the firm how leanly staffed the cases are is a question to ask?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432496
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Leverage and Substantive Work
Yes, "how are your cases typically staffed?" is a fine question.
-
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm
Re: Leverage and Substantive Work
Not only is it a fine question, you'll get a relatively wide variety of answers and give you some insight into workload. FWIW I ask this in every interview.Anonymous User wrote:Yes, "how are your cases typically staffed?" is a fine question.