Leverage and Substantive Work Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432496
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Leverage and Substantive Work

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 03, 2015 11:12 pm

If an office has more partners than associates, is that a pretty good sign that you're going to get good work?

User avatar
Johann

Diamond
Posts: 19704
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm

Re: Leverage and Substantive Work

Post by Johann » Thu Sep 03, 2015 11:39 pm

depends on the firm. just post the firm if you are posting anony.

User avatar
los blancos

Platinum
Posts: 8397
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm

Re: Leverage and Substantive Work

Post by los blancos » Fri Sep 04, 2015 12:10 am

JohannDeMann wrote:depends on the firm.
Yep. In theory the answer is yes, but sometimes upside-down pyramid-shaped firms can result in partners hoarding work if they're not doing so hot on the business development front.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432496
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Leverage and Substantive Work

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Sep 04, 2015 2:18 am

In my experience, there is a much stronger correlation between lean staffing and getting substantive work than there is between leverage and getting substantive work. We have a group in my office that is very partner-heavy and does big-ticket cases. It's not a good group for young associates - the cases are big enough to staff a ton of people on, and the partners (and senior associates) gobble up all the fun and interesting work. By contrast, we also have partners who primarily work on smaller matters for more cost-conscious clients. They typically prefer to staff matters with no more than 1-2 associates, and you tend to get very cool work (depositions, brief-writing, etc.) from those cases.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432496
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Leverage and Substantive Work

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Sep 04, 2015 10:55 am

Anonymous User wrote:In my experience, there is a much stronger correlation between lean staffing and getting substantive work than there is between leverage and getting substantive work. We have a group in my office that is very partner-heavy and does big-ticket cases. It's not a good group for young associates - the cases are big enough to staff a ton of people on, and the partners (and senior associates) gobble up all the fun and interesting work. By contrast, we also have partners who primarily work on smaller matters for more cost-conscious clients. They typically prefer to staff matters with no more than 1-2 associates, and you tend to get very cool work (depositions, brief-writing, etc.) from those cases.


So, asking associates at the firm how leanly staffed the cases are is a question to ask?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432496
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Leverage and Substantive Work

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Sep 04, 2015 12:04 pm

Yes, "how are your cases typically staffed?" is a fine question.

RaceJudicata

Gold
Posts: 1867
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:51 pm

Re: Leverage and Substantive Work

Post by RaceJudicata » Fri Sep 04, 2015 12:31 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Yes, "how are your cases typically staffed?" is a fine question.
Not only is it a fine question, you'll get a relatively wide variety of answers and give you some insight into workload. FWIW I ask this in every interview.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”