Gibson Dunn v. Paul Weiss Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Gibson Dunn v. Paul Weiss
Considering each firm's culture and transactional work, what are the reasons to pick one firm over the other?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Gibson Dunn v. Paul Weiss
The two firms are similar for corporate work -- Chambers gives a small edge to Paul Weiss (http://www.chambersandpartners.com/1280 ... torial/5/1). I tend to think Paul Weiss has a bigger corporate presence in NY, but the difference here isn't big enough to stop you from going to Gibson if you liked them better. I have friends at both firms and I'd say that they also have comparable cultures/personalities, at least in NY.
