Davis Polk versus Paul Weiss for litigation Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432523
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Davis Polk versus Paul Weiss for litigation
Davis Polk NY versus Paul Weiss NY for litigation, any thoughts?
-
- Posts: 432523
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Davis Polk versus Paul Weiss for litigation
Do you want to do securities litigation or other stuff?
-
- Posts: 432523
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Davis Polk versus Paul Weiss for litigation
Both are great. Top of the game for NY lit. Paul Weiss is slightly more litigation focused, whereas Davis Polk's corporate groups are larger, but it won't impact the reputation of your practice as a junior. Paul Weiss is apparently a more brutal place to start in litigation (it "churns through junior litigators" at a higher rate), but your hours will be rough either way. As the poster above alluded, Davis Polk's lit department is dominated by white collar and securities, whereas Paul Weiss will have more diverse groups, but they both have strengths across the board. If you really really hate securities lit or bank clients, then you should probably stay away from DPW, though.
-
- Posts: 432523
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Davis Polk versus Paul Weiss for litigation
Is one more highly regarded than the other in NY, and will one have better exit opportunities?
-
- Posts: 1090
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 4:12 pm
Re: Davis Polk versus Paul Weiss for litigation
There's a couple of threads on this exact question already. Just do a search
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432523
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Davis Polk versus Paul Weiss for litigation
And thank you!!
-
- Posts: 1651
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:42 am
-
- Posts: 432523
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Davis Polk versus Paul Weiss for litigation
I've heard these rumors, but everyone I know there is really happy. Am I talking to the wrong people, and what does it mean that it churns through juniors? If the hours are the same, how is it a more grueling place than DPW or places like Cravath and S&C?Anonymous User wrote:Both are great. Top of the game for NY lit. Paul Weiss is slightly more litigation focused, whereas Davis Polk's corporate groups are larger, but it won't impact the reputation of your practice as a junior. Paul Weiss is apparently a more brutal place to start in litigation (it "churns through junior litigators" at a higher rate), but your hours will be rough either way. As the poster above alluded, Davis Polk's lit department is dominated by white collar and securities, whereas Paul Weiss will have more diverse groups, but they both have strengths across the board. If you really really hate securities lit or bank clients, then you should probably stay away from DPW, though.
-
- Posts: 432523
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Davis Polk versus Paul Weiss for litigation
Based on people I know at both, I think PW is probably a little more brutal, but you might be more likely to get real responsibility early. That's not necessarily a good thing for everyone. That and culture are probably what should guide.
Great offers. There's no wrong choice here.
Great offers. There's no wrong choice here.