Low leverage -- bad firm choice? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 431118
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Low leverage -- bad firm choice?
I know that higher leverage usually means better financial stability, but lower leverage generally means a more realistic shot at making partner. Is there any reason to be hesitant of low-leverage firms if they aren't showing other signs of financial instability (massive partner/associate exoduses, major line of business drying up)?
