NY GOES TO 180k! IT HAPPENED!!!! (CovingTTTon does a 180! Holder wept.) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
DFTHREAD
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 3:37 am, edited 2 times in total.
- lhanvt13
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2014 1:05 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Wait, so is it actually confirmed, or is this an attempt at dialing in a joke (see what I did there...)Anonymous User wrote:can confirm, was at the meeting. firm will now pay for tethering on cell phone plans.Anonymous User wrote:Skadden adjusting compensation confirmed.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
it's real. you could say we're all getting one nine (inch) D78623089 wrote:Wait, so is it actually confirmed, or is this an attempt at dialing in a joke (see what I did there...)Anonymous User wrote:can confirm, was at the meeting. firm will now pay for tethering on cell phone plans.Anonymous User wrote:Skadden adjusting compensation confirmed.
-
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 6:48 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
If this were a joke, it'd be funny. But it's not funny. Therefore, WE DID IT!!!!!Anonymous User wrote:it's real. you could say we're all getting one nine (inch) D78623089 wrote:Wait, so is it actually confirmed, or is this an attempt at dialing in a joke (see what I did there...)Anonymous User wrote:can confirm, was at the meeting. firm will now pay for tethering on cell phone plans.Anonymous User wrote:Skadden adjusting compensation confirmed.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Skadden did no such thing. In fact, at yesterday's meeting, Skadden made it more difficult to get bonus for 2016 by increasing the minimum billable hours by 200 hours. These are the facts.
- TLSModBot
- Posts: 14835
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Obviously they made bonuses more difficult to achieve to offset the cost of RISING SALARIES.Anonymous User wrote:Skadden did no such thing. In fact, at yesterday's meeting, Skadden made it more difficult to get bonus for 2016 by increasing the minimum billable hours by 200 hours. These are the facts.
- El Pollito
- Posts: 20139
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
are we there yet
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I really don't think so. This move pissed everyone off, and everyone in the room felt kind of stunned, especially because it was a meeting in response to our comments on a firm wide survey. Many of the responses on the survey expressed a desire for MORE COMPENSATION, not a more difficult bar for obtaining bonus.Capitol_Idea wrote:Obviously they made bonuses more difficult to achieve to offset the cost of RISING SALARIES.Anonymous User wrote:Skadden did no such thing. In fact, at yesterday's meeting, Skadden made it more difficult to get bonus for 2016 by increasing the minimum billable hours by 200 hours. These are the facts.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
The great deal season of 2014 must be drying up. Now is not a good time to be entering law folks. Next years summer class is sure to be down. Bonuses down and health insurance down and hour requirements up.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Don't panic. Skadden is sending a message that's all. At least my firm's (v10) upcoming summer class is up substantially and partners are still making a ton of money this year.JohannDeMann wrote:The great deal season of 2014 must be drying up. Now is not a good time to be entering law folks. Next years summer class is sure to be down. Bonuses down and health insurance down and hour requirements up.
- smaug
- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Sadden anon, what's your new hours requirement?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- fats provolone
- Posts: 7125
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:44 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
this is obviously a lie. they raised the hours requirement by 190.Anonymous User wrote:Skadden did no such thing. In fact, at yesterday's meeting, Skadden made it more difficult to get bonus for 2016 by increasing the minimum billable hours by 200 hours. These are the facts.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Skadden didn't have a minimum billable requirement before so looks like the new requirement is 200 hours (or possibly 190, there's conflicting information out there).
Obviously making 190K is better but $160,000 divided by 200 is like $800 an hour which is still pretty good money. lol people on these boards complain about everything.
Obviously making 190K is better but $160,000 divided by 200 is like $800 an hour which is still pretty good money. lol people on these boards complain about everything.
-
- Posts: 776
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 10:23 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Skadden's min was either 1600 or 1700; I believe it was the former
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
http://www.chambers-associate.com/true-picture/3656/1Traynor Brah wrote:Skadden's min was either 1600 or 1700; I believe it was the former
Did you know that Skadden is famous for Being Skadden- an awesome firm and an awesome brand?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
from the article: The only grumble about compensation came from New York associates, who felt the salary “isn't keeping pace” with the Big Apple's ever-increasing living costs. “It hasn't increased in something like seven years, so at some point they will need to change that.” NYC -> 190kBigZuck wrote:http://www.chambers-associate.com/true-picture/3656/1Traynor Brah wrote:Skadden's min was either 1600 or 1700; I believe it was the former
Did you know that Skadden is famous for Being Skadden- an awesome firm and an awesome brand?
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
200 (or 190) on top of 1600 is still meaningless compared to actual billables, but helps to justify salary increase.BigZuck wrote:http://www.chambers-associate.com/true-picture/3656/1Traynor Brah wrote:Skadden's min was either 1600 or 1700; I believe it was the former
Did you know that Skadden is famous for Being Skadden- an awesome firm and an awesome brand?
Skadden to 190.
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 12:52 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
^ didn't mean to anon.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Paul Hasting NYC moved from 1950 to 2000 hours for bonus.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
Anonymous User wrote:Paul Hasting NYC moved from 1950 to 2000 hours for bonus.
Did firms raise billable before the 2007 jump to 160k? History repeats itself! TLS historians: we need you here.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
For one thing, each salary increase has been accompanied with a corresponding increase in billable minimums. - http://www.gerryriskin.com/the-wall-str ... arms-race/Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Paul Hasting NYC moved from 1950 to 2000 hours for bonus.
Did firms raise billable before the 2007 jump to 160k? History repeats itself! TLS historians: we need you here.
A&O increased hours early 2006 - http://www.lawfuel.com/london-based-all ... ly-unhappy
There was a spike in hours when firms began raising salary levels to compete for top law talent in the dot-com era of the late 90s, experts say. Companies entered into an "arms race" to provide the highest pay. To compensate, they had to increase the number of hours the firm billed. - from 2007 http://apps.americanbar.org/buslaw/blt/ ... rosz.shtml
It's happening
edit: what's more TTT? Have some firm announce a salary increase, then match and at the same time or later increase billables or announce the increase in billables first and then match a salary increase?
- smaug
- Posts: 13972
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2015 8:31 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
I'm honestly getting worried we are going to repeat 07/08 soon.
Hold on to your seats, sheeple.
Hold on to your seats, sheeple.
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: NY to 190k??(possibly led by Paul Weiss)
yeah raising hours to raise pay is not really something id care to see. i would much rather the big bonuses in years with extra pay. because if the work dries up a little and people start missing hours, theres going to be a lot of layoffs coming.smaug wrote:I'm honestly getting worried we are going to repeat 07/08 soon.
Hold on to your seats, sheeple.
first years used to get like $35k bonuses. that's the shit we need.
i'm cool with the V10 raising their hours to raise pay as long as the rest of the herd doesnt follow. but id have 0 chance of surviving in the 2200 hour realm.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login