why are firms like susman and KVN not vault-ranked? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
gaddockteeg
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 5:33 pm
why are firms like susman and KVN not vault-ranked?
I get that Vault is pretty inaccurate at times (bias in favor NY firms, bias towards M&A, etc), but how is it possible that firms like keker van nest, kellog huber, and susman godfrey are not ranked in vault100 at all? are there really that many associates out there who don't know of these firms?
-
Cavalier
- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:13 pm
Re: why are firms like susman and KVN not vault-ranked?
Vault ranks biglaw, not boutiques. It's impossible to compare the "prestige" of an 800-attorney full-service law firm to a small firm that specializes in trial or appellate work.
-
Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
DFTHREAD
fobstory.jpeg
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:30 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
TLSModBot
- Posts: 14835
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am
Re: why are firms like susman and KVN not vault-ranked?
lol @ 'trannie practices'Desert Fox wrote:I bet virtually nobody in NYC trannie practices has heard of KVN, KH, or SG.gaddockteeg wrote:I get that Vault is pretty inaccurate at times (bias in favor NY firms, bias towards M&A, etc), but how is it possible that firms like keker van nest, kellog huber, and susman godfrey are not ranked in vault100 at all? are there really that many associates out there who don't know of these firms?
-
gaddockteeg
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 5:33 pm
Re: why are firms like susman and KVN not vault-ranked?
Yeah I guess so. It just feels so backwards to me that someone out there is voting for like Nixon Peabody over susman.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
