W&C to 200K Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 8:35 am
W&C to 200K
Am I really the first one to pick this up? http://abovethelaw.com/2015/04/nationwi ... -connolly/
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 5:37 pm
Re: W&C to 200K
So... will this be enough to raise the market to $190k or above?
Whatcha think
Whatcha think
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2014 2:11 pm
Re: W&C to 200K
deng wrote:So... will this be enough to raise the market to $190k or above?
Whatcha think
It's another ripple in the water, similar of Philly going to $160k recently. But mid-levels at W&C are still behind mid-levels at a market+DPW firm.
We've got momentum, but this isn't a tipping point.
- Cobretti
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: W&C to 200K
the movement is growing... soon my brothers (and sisters)Can I hear “NY to 190″
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: W&C to 200K
It's not a big deal because it's only sligthly above market (when considering bonus) for juniors and then below market for midlevels and seniors.charliekelly33 wrote:Am I really the first one to pick this up? http://abovethelaw.com/2015/04/nationwi ... -connolly/
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 8:35 am
Re: W&C to 200K
Above the law is guessing at the mid level salaries. The old salary graduated from a 15K bump for the first years to a 20K bump for the more senior levels. The midlevels on the new W&C scale might actually get 25k bumps since their base is higher, and therefore, their percentage increase would be a higher overall amount. That might mean they are actually more competitive than the Above the Law breakdown indicates.sweeteavodka wrote:deng wrote:So... will this be enough to raise the market to $190k or above?
Whatcha think
It's another ripple in the water, similar of Philly going to $160k recently. But mid-levels at W&C are still behind mid-levels at a market+DPW firm.
We've got momentum, but this isn't a tipping point.
Overall, its good news. W&C undoubtedly pays its first and second years more than the Cravath-scale firms (without the pressure of making bonus numbers) and that will translate into a recruiting advantage this fall.
-
- Posts: 349
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:21 pm
Re: W&C to 200K
My feeling as well. Probably at least a few years of good economy off any real marketwide pay raises.sweeteavodka wrote:deng wrote:So... will this be enough to raise the market to $190k or above?
Whatcha think
It's another ripple in the water, similar of Philly going to $160k recently. But mid-levels at W&C are still behind mid-levels at a market+DPW firm.
We've got momentum, but this isn't a tipping point.
- skers
- Posts: 5230
- Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:33 am
Re: W&C to 200K
idk dude. Salary increases for juniors are more encouraging than anything.Desert Fox wrote:It's not a big deal because it's only sligthly above market (when considering bonus) for juniors and then below market for midlevels and seniors.charliekelly33 wrote:Am I really the first one to pick this up? http://abovethelaw.com/2015/04/nationwi ... -connolly/
- WhirledWorld
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:04 am
Re: W&C to 200K
W&C has always been a rogue player in the associate compensation game, so this doesn't exactly pressure other firms to up associate compensation.
For biglaw comp to change overall, one of the other NYC associate comp market makers (in the past, Simpson Thacher and Cravath, and sort of S&C and Skadden) will have to make a move.
For biglaw comp to change overall, one of the other NYC associate comp market makers (in the past, Simpson Thacher and Cravath, and sort of S&C and Skadden) will have to make a move.
- Desert Fox
- Posts: 18283
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm
Re: W&C to 200K
It's pretty common for lit boutiques to overpay juniors and underpay seniors and I'm not really sure why.skers wrote:idk dude. Salary increases for juniors are more encouraging than anything.Desert Fox wrote:It's not a big deal because it's only sligthly above market (when considering bonus) for juniors and then below market for midlevels and seniors.charliekelly33 wrote:Am I really the first one to pick this up? http://abovethelaw.com/2015/04/nationwi ... -connolly/
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Yukos
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: W&C to 200K
I've heard (from a law prof who studies the law firm industry, for what it's worth) that at more senior levels boutiques are depending on culture and a real feeling of "partnership" more than pay to keep people around. That's why many elite boutiques are pure lockstep, even with partners, while bigger firms go crazy trying to pay based on "merit" or whatever (e.g. the Mayer Brown 50-factor system). Not saying this is the real reason, or that it works, but it sounds plausible at least.Desert Fox wrote:It's pretty common for lit boutiques to overpay juniors and underpay seniors and I'm not really sure why.skers wrote:idk dude. Salary increases for juniors are more encouraging than anything.Desert Fox wrote:It's not a big deal because it's only sligthly above market (when considering bonus) for juniors and then below market for midlevels and seniors.charliekelly33 wrote:Am I really the first one to pick this up? http://abovethelaw.com/2015/04/nationwi ... -connolly/
- Yardbird
- Posts: 1156
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 1:45 pm
Re: W&C to 200K
Surely you mean the Simpson-scale with DPW bonuses.charliekelly33 wrote:Above the law is guessing at the mid level salaries. The old salary graduated from a 15K bump for the first years to a 20K bump for the more senior levels. The midlevels on the new W&C scale might actually get 25k bumps since their base is higher, and therefore, their percentage increase would be a higher overall amount. That might mean they are actually more competitive than the Above the Law breakdown indicates.sweeteavodka wrote:deng wrote:So... will this be enough to raise the market to $190k or above?
Whatcha think
It's another ripple in the water, similar of Philly going to $160k recently. But mid-levels at W&C are still behind mid-levels at a market+DPW firm.
We've got momentum, but this isn't a tipping point.
Overall, its good news. W&C undoubtedly pays its first and second years more than the Cravath-scale firms (without the pressure of making bonus numbers) and that will translate into a recruiting advantage this fall.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: W&C to 200K
Anyone know or care to guess if this year's summer class will get paid more b/c of the raise? Before the news, summers were going to get paid same weekly salary as first year associates.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: W&C to 200K
Unsurprising and effectively a match. If they didn't raise they'd be well below total comp of even Covington's crappy bonuses. No meaning not already conveyed by the DPW bonuses.
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2015 3:58 pm
Re: W&C to 200K
Does W&C even have first year associates? I thought everyone in their class clerked (not exaggerating).
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:22 pm
Re: W&C to 200K
This.Desert Fox wrote:It's [still] below market for midlevels and seniors.
Though still great to hear.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: W&C to 200K
+1 to any instance of clarifying that Cravath deserves no credit as a compensation leader in any way, shape or form.shadowofjazz wrote:Surely you mean the Simpson-scale with DPW bonuses.charliekelly33 wrote:
Above the law is guessing at the mid level salaries. The old salary graduated from a 15K bump for the first years to a 20K bump for the more senior levels. The midlevels on the new W&C scale might actually get 25k bumps since their base is higher, and therefore, their percentage increase would be a higher overall amount. That might mean they are actually more competitive than the Above the Law breakdown indicates.
Overall, its good news. W&C undoubtedly pays its first and second years more than the Cravath-scale firms (without the pressure of making bonus numbers) and that will translate into a recruiting advantage this fall.
- yomisterd
- Posts: 1571
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 12:52 pm
Re: W&C to 200K
seems like a great place to work for a couple years before going BigFed
good work if you can get it
good work if you can get it
-
- Posts: 2248
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: W&C to 200K
Not everyone clerks. I know a first year they hired through 3L OCILawyerrr wrote:Does W&C even have first year associates? I thought everyone in their class clerked (not exaggerating).
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: W&C to 200K
You overpay juniors to attract clerks. You underpay seniors because, compared to their counterparts in big law, partnership prospects are typically better and so you don't have to pay the seniors as much to stay.Desert Fox wrote: It's pretty common for lit boutiques to overpay juniors and underpay seniors and I'm not really sure why.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- SquedTheScholar
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 12:13 pm
Re: W&C to 200K
Consensus on whether this will push DPW, STB, etc. to 200 before September?
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: W&C to 200K
I don't see why DPW Cravath ect would match first year salary of a firm that always paid above market. They might go to $175 or $180 base bringing all in to $190-195, at least that's what we're all hoping for.SquedTheScholar wrote:Consensus on whether this will push DPW, STB, etc. to 200 before September?
- skers
- Posts: 5230
- Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:33 am
Re: W&C to 200K
jbagelboy wrote:SquedTheScholar wrote:Consensus on whether this will push DPW, STB, etc. to 200 before September?NY to 190?I don't see why DPW Cravath ect would match first year salary of a firm that always paid above market. They might go to $175 or $180 base bringing all in to $190-195, at least that's what we're all hoping for.NY to 190.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: W&C to 200K
skers wrote:jbagelboy wrote:SquedTheScholar wrote:Consensus on whether this will push DPW, STB, etc. to 200 before September?NY to 190?I don't see why DPW Cravath ect would match first year salary of a firm that always paid above market. They might go to $175 or $180 base bringing all in to $190-195, at least that's what we're all hoping for.NY to 190.

hey, that'd be swell.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login