Set to be in litigation but want transactional Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
User avatar

Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 12:13 pm

Set to be in litigation but want transactional

Post by SquedTheScholar » Thu Mar 19, 2015 11:18 pm

How would an incoming associate slated for litigation switch to corporate transactional work in a big firm (v5)? Should you start out pretending to give litigation a try for the first month and then request transactional work? Or should you voice this desire before you start? Looking to see if there are any hard any fast rules for this.


Posts: 465
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:35 pm

Re: Set to be in litigation but want transactional

Post by KidStuddi » Fri Mar 20, 2015 12:02 am

You can just be up front with it; it's not an uncommon request. Litigation departments also tend to over recruit because of expected losses to clerkships.

Some firms might make you repeat your first year if you wait too long. Not the worst thing in the world though, honestly. Yeah you give up some pay, and your path to partnership is even longer if that's your goal. But I think it's kind of a savvy move to be a "first year" who's heads and shoulders above the rest of his class from the start, and it's probably an extra year before the up or out pressure really builds.

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”