IP lit dead? Forum

Aureusmons · Post by **Aureusmons** » Thu Feb 26, 2015 9:03 am

....
..

BeenDidThat · Post by **BeenDidThat** » Thu Feb 26, 2015 10:40 am

Aureusmons wrote:Reports of IP lit's death have been greatly exaggerated.
see, e.g.,
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSK ... 5?irpc=932
and
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? ... _id=256145

Wtf is this.

kcdc1 · Post by **kcdc1** » Thu Feb 26, 2015 11:47 am

The patents supporting the judgment are pretty likely invalid post-Alice. This type of case illustrates why patent lit is likely to cool off.

Big Shrimpin · Post by **Big Shrimpin** » Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:25 pm

fck troll litigation

id be happy to see it go

glitched · Post by **glitched** » Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:27 pm

BeenDidThat wrote:
Aureusmons wrote:Reports of IP lit's death have been greatly exaggerated.
see, e.g.,
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSK ... 5?irpc=932
and
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? ... _id=256145
Wtf is this.

Big Shrimpin · Post by **Big Shrimpin** » Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:30 pm

glitched wrote:
BeenDidThat wrote:
Aureusmons wrote:Reports of IP lit's death have been greatly exaggerated.
see, e.g.,
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSK ... 5?irpc=932
and
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? ... _id=256145
Wtf is this.

yeah wtf, esp re the first link

the ssrn paper was floating around on XOXO i think (if its same one)

i skimmed it...nothing we dont already know

Anonymous User · Post by **Anonymous User** » Thu Feb 26, 2015 11:35 pm

Big Shrimpin wrote:fck troll litigation

id be happy to see it go

Apple Told by Jury to Pay $532.9 Million in Patent Trial

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/ ... tent-trial

lacrossebrother · Post by **lacrossebrother** » Thu Feb 26, 2015 11:37 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:fck troll litigation

id be happy to see it go
Apple Told by Jury to Pay $532.9 Million in Patent Trial

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/ ... tent-trial

how much do you want to bet that apple wins on appeal?

Anonymous User · Post by **Anonymous User** » Thu Feb 26, 2015 11:39 pm

lacrossebrother wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:fck troll litigation

id be happy to see it go
Apple Told by Jury to Pay $532.9 Million in Patent Trial

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/ ... tent-trial
how much do you want to bet that apple wins on appeal?

CBM was denied by the PTAB, so this troll flash LLC at least had some merit in its patent

Anonymous User · Post by **Anonymous User** » Thu Feb 26, 2015 11:40 pm

Desert Fox · Post by **Desert Fox** » Thu Feb 26, 2015 11:45 pm

Big Shrimpin wrote:fck troll litigation

id be happy to see it go

Troll lit is the lifeblood of the industry bro.,

Desert Fox · Post by **Desert Fox** » Thu Feb 26, 2015 11:47 pm

Alice will only increase litigation because people will think they can beat the patent and the only way to do it is fight it out. After a while, Trolls will just move onto hardware stuff.

The only thing that worries me is fee shifting.

Anonymous User · Post by **Anonymous User** » Thu Feb 26, 2015 11:49 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:fck troll litigation

id be happy to see it go

Troll lit is the lifeblood of the industry bro.,

CS,EE, not so much for pharma, bio. Troll is the reason firm like mckool smith can pay way above NY scale in recent years. In this case Flash llc is represented by former McKool partners.

Desert Fox · Post by **Desert Fox** » Thu Feb 26, 2015 11:53 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:fck troll litigation

id be happy to see it go

Troll lit is the lifeblood of the industry bro.,
CS,EE, not so much for pharma, bio. Troll is the reason firm like McKool Smith can pay way above NY scale in recent years. In this case Flash llc is represented by former McKool partners.

Pharma is probably okay either way, but bio would probably get besieged by packs of CS doods willing to undercut u on price.

lacrossebrother · Post by **lacrossebrother** » Thu Feb 26, 2015 11:57 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:fck troll litigation

id be happy to see it go

Troll lit is the lifeblood of the industry bro.,
CS,EE, not so much for pharma, bio. Troll is the reason firm like McKool Smith can pay way above NY scale in recent years. In this case Flash llc is represented by former McKool partners.

jesus this is the same firm that did virnetx? these bros must be rolling in it

84651846190 · Post by **84651846190** » Fri Feb 27, 2015 3:22 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:fck troll litigation

id be happy to see it go

Troll lit is the lifeblood of the industry bro.,
CS,EE, not so much for pharma, bio. Troll is the reason firm like McKool Smith can pay way above NY scale in recent years. In this case Flash llc is represented by former McKool partners.

What I don't get is why CS/EE tech companies are still going bonkers with amassing huge patent portfolios that are going to be worth less than shit in the future.

Desert Fox · Post by **Desert Fox** » Fri Feb 27, 2015 3:32 am

Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:fck troll litigation

id be happy to see it go

Troll lit is the lifeblood of the industry bro.,
CS,EE, not so much for pharma, bio. Troll is the reason firm like McKool Smith can pay way above NY scale in recent years. In this case Flash llc is represented by former McKool partners.
What I don't get is why CS/EE tech companies are still going bonkers with amassing huge patent portfolios that are going to be worth less than shit in the future.

1) It's a good defense against competitor suits.

2) Even a really broad interpretation of Alice and a broad patent reform bill won't make legit tech patents worthless.

Big Shrimpin · Post by **Big Shrimpin** » Fri Feb 27, 2015 4:54 pm

Desert Fox wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Desert Fox wrote:
Big Shrimpin wrote:fck troll litigation

id be happy to see it go

Troll lit is the lifeblood of the industry bro.,
CS,EE, not so much for pharma, bio. Troll is the reason firm like McKool Smith can pay way above NY scale in recent years. In this case Flash llc is represented by former McKool partners.
Pharma is probably okay either way, but bio would probably get besieged by packs of CS doods willing to undercut u on price.

pharma/biosims ftw

thats that sht i DO like

IP lit dead? Forum

IP lit dead?

Re: IP lit dead?

Re: IP lit dead?

Re: IP lit dead?

Re: IP lit dead?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: IP lit dead?

Re: IP lit dead?

Re: IP lit dead?

Re: IP lit dead?

Register for access!

Re: IP lit dead?

Re: IP lit dead?

Re: IP lit dead?

Re: IP lit dead?

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: IP lit dead?

Re: IP lit dead?

Re: IP lit dead?

Re: IP lit dead?

Re: IP lit dead?

Register now!