MoFo v. KTS (Palo Alto) Patent Prosecution Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
MoFo v. KTS (Palo Alto) Patent Prosecution
Can anyone give pros and cons of Morrison & Foerster and Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton as well as any comparisons between the two for patent prosecution?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MoFo v. KTS (Palo Alto) Patent Prosecution
2L who CBed and ultimately decided between these firms and several others
My impression is that hours would be much, much better at KTS, but your pay (especially when taking into account rate of growth over years) will be a bit lower
Also, enormous office vs. small office, obvious differences... I felt that it would be much more likely to have a long and stable career at KTS, at least the way they pitch it that way.
But, if MoFo is SF, I would wayyyyy rather live in SF, as a single 20something. Or if commuting from SF, 15 minute commute to MoFo on muni >>>>> 1 hour commute on caltrain+shuttle/bike
My impression is that hours would be much, much better at KTS, but your pay (especially when taking into account rate of growth over years) will be a bit lower
Also, enormous office vs. small office, obvious differences... I felt that it would be much more likely to have a long and stable career at KTS, at least the way they pitch it that way.
But, if MoFo is SF, I would wayyyyy rather live in SF, as a single 20something. Or if commuting from SF, 15 minute commute to MoFo on muni >>>>> 1 hour commute on caltrain+shuttle/bike
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MoFo v. KTS (Palo Alto) Patent Prosecution
OP: SA or lateral?Anonymous User wrote:Can anyone give pros and cons of Morrison & Foerster and Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton as well as any comparisons between the two for patent prosecution?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MoFo v. KTS (Palo Alto) Patent Prosecution
I've heard QoL is much better at KTS. FWIW, though heard secondhand, apparently lateraling to MoFo is a difficult transition.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MoFo v. KTS (Palo Alto) Patent Prosecution
Can you elaborate a little on what you have heard? If not, no worries.Anonymous User wrote:I've heard QoL is much better at KTS. FWIW, though heard secondhand, apparently lateraling to MoFo is a difficult transition.
