KIRKLAND SHATTERS the Above the Law Rankings; we rank things Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- sideroxylon
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 2:13 pm
KIRKLAND SHATTERS the Above the Law Rankings; we rank things
no idea what to think of these
people who are smarter than I am, give us opinions
http://abovethelaw.com/careers/2015-law-firm-rankings/
people who are smarter than I am, give us opinions
http://abovethelaw.com/careers/2015-law-firm-rankings/
Last edited by sideroxylon on Mon Oct 13, 2014 12:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:26 am
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
.
Last edited by JusticeJackson on Tue Nov 10, 2015 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- patogordo
- Posts: 4826
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:33 am
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
shit, wachtell is #1? i knew i was an idiot for turning them down.
- Yukos
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
Any list that tries to be all things to all people is going to have issues. Seems better than Vault though. At least its methodology is less laughable.
-
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
They suffer from (one of) the same flaw(s) as their law school rankings. They rely on ATL's own "insider" survey data about firm reputation and satisfaction. Who is actually filling those things out?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Sun Feb 15, 2015 6:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
comes down to whether a ranking of people's opinions of firms they dont work at is better than a ranking of people's opinions of their own firms. i think the latter is not as dangerous a tool in the context of biglaw because of the high degree of associate dissatisfaction. but then again... K&E is #2.
- Monochromatic Oeuvre
- Posts: 2481
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
To wax poetic about how you're outcome-focused and then stick in a metric like the percent of partners who are women is misleading at best.
Better idea:
40% average associate compensation
10% average partner compensation
25% percent of incoming class making equity partner
25% reputation among in-house recruiters
Better idea:
40% average associate compensation
10% average partner compensation
25% percent of incoming class making equity partner
25% reputation among in-house recruiters
- sinfiery
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
If this is law firm rankings and not law firms for law student rankings, PPP should be atleast 50% of the rankings
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
more like RPLsinfiery wrote:If this is law firm rankings and not law firms for law student rankings, PPP should be atleast 50% of the rankings
- 84651846190
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
Throw out the recruiters and add something like "percentage of alums serving as judges/tenured profs/general counsel of F500s/heads of prefstigious fed agencies" or something like that.Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:To wax poetic about how you're outcome-focused and then stick in a metric like the percent of partners who are women is misleading at best.
Better idea:
40% average associate compensation
10% average partner compensation
25% percent of incoming class making equity partner
25% reputation among in-house recruiters
Recruiters are shitheads who don't know anything about anything, other than they want to sell you on any position they can possibly fit your ass into.
-
- Posts: 432501
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
my law firm ranking (assuming I didn't fail the bar exam) matches my law school USN rank. The symmetry is pleasing.
-
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:03 pm
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
Did you enjoy your time at Florida International University Law School
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
how is this result different from vault tho. seems essentially the same. the V10 are still V10, the V20 are still V20 (w/ munger thrown in). so what if a few of the same firms traded places a few spots. doesn't seem like anyone can break away from vaultYukos wrote:Any list that tries to be all things to all people is going to have issues. Seems better than Vault though. At least its methodology is less laughable.
honestly lol @ ATL for pulling all these machinations and developing the same list. kind of sad since it perpetuates the unfortunate notion that prestige can proxy for anything
- sideroxylon
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 2:13 pm
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
Paul Weiss, Gibson, Skadden and Weil are all decently removed from their Vault rankingsjbagelboy wrote:how is this result different from vault tho. seems essentially the same. the V10 are still V10, the V20 are still V20 (w/ munger thrown in). so what if a few of the same firms traded places a few spots. doesn't seem like anyone can break away from vaultYukos wrote:Any list that tries to be all things to all people is going to have issues. Seems better than Vault though. At least its methodology is less laughable.
honestly lol @ ATL for pulling all these machinations and developing the same list. kind of sad since it perpetuates the unfortunate notion that prestige can proxy for anything
I guess it's also just a question of how much you expect it to change. I'm sure they could find metrics to put W&C on top or not have Susman somehow down at 87, but I'm not exactly sure how you do that.
- Sheriff
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2014 2:06 pm
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
Cooley in the top 25?! Now I've seen everyTTTThing.


- sideroxylon
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 2:13 pm
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
I can't tell if you're really unfunny or just really stupid.Sheriff wrote:Cooley in the top 25?! Now I've seen everyTTTThing.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Sheriff
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2014 2:06 pm
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
Why does it have to be one or the other?sideroxylon wrote:I can't tell if you're really unfunny or just really stupid.Sheriff wrote:Cooley in the top 25?! Now I've seen everyTTTThing.
-
- Posts: 432501
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
The firm I am going to (one of the ones sideroxlyn mentioned) went up pretty significantly, so I like them.
-
- Posts: 432501
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
No Magic Circle firms in the top 100?
Seems legit.
Seems legit.
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
I wouldn't consider 3 places (or even 7) "decently removed," since vault floats year to year and its all a wash within those 15-20 firms. Also having a non-equity, light track partner class counting as "home grown" partners probably skews kirkland's results pretty heavily, but I doubt anyone cared to distinguish for that metric.sideroxylon wrote:Paul Weiss, Gibson, Skadden and Weil are all decently removed from their Vault rankingsjbagelboy wrote:how is this result different from vault tho. seems essentially the same. the V10 are still V10, the V20 are still V20 (w/ munger thrown in). so what if a few of the same firms traded places a few spots. doesn't seem like anyone can break away from vaultYukos wrote:Any list that tries to be all things to all people is going to have issues. Seems better than Vault though. At least its methodology is less laughable.
honestly lol @ ATL for pulling all these machinations and developing the same list. kind of sad since it perpetuates the unfortunate notion that prestige can proxy for anything
I guess it's also just a question of how much you expect it to change. I'm sure they could find metrics to put W&C on top or not have Susman somehow down at 87, but I'm not exactly sure how you do that.
You could establish firms like W&C and Susman on top rather easily by adding a selectivity measure and weighting it heaviest (although this is really silly as well). You're right though, why expect more. I guess I'm just always disappointed by ATL when it tries to rank things, pretending its lists will be so much more accurate and sincere than the dominant available commercial ranking but then essentially replicating them.
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
- wiz
- Posts: 44572
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 11:25 pm
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
Poor White & Case
-
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:37 pm
Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?
Above the law has completely sold out. When I started reading them five years ago they correctly recognized that rankings were harmful to the legal field. Now they rank everything.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login