KIRKLAND SHATTERS the Above the Law Rankings; we rank things Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
User avatar
sideroxylon

Gold
Posts: 2245
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 2:13 pm

KIRKLAND SHATTERS the Above the Law Rankings; we rank things

Post by sideroxylon » Fri Oct 10, 2014 2:50 pm

no idea what to think of these

people who are smarter than I am, give us opinions

http://abovethelaw.com/careers/2015-law-firm-rankings/
Last edited by sideroxylon on Mon Oct 13, 2014 12:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.

JusticeJackson

Silver
Posts: 609
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:26 am

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by JusticeJackson » Fri Oct 10, 2014 2:57 pm

.
Last edited by JusticeJackson on Tue Nov 10, 2015 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
patogordo

Gold
Posts: 4826
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:33 am

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by patogordo » Fri Oct 10, 2014 3:05 pm

shit, wachtell is #1? i knew i was an idiot for turning them down.

User avatar
Yukos

Gold
Posts: 1774
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by Yukos » Fri Oct 10, 2014 3:19 pm

Any list that tries to be all things to all people is going to have issues. Seems better than Vault though. At least its methodology is less laughable.

dixiecupdrinking

Gold
Posts: 3436
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by dixiecupdrinking » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:40 pm

They suffer from (one of) the same flaw(s) as their law school rankings. They rely on ATL's own "insider" survey data about firm reputation and satisfaction. Who is actually filling those things out?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


20141023

Gold
Posts: 3070
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by 20141023 » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:48 pm

.
Last edited by 20141023 on Sun Feb 15, 2015 6:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Old Gregg

Platinum
Posts: 5409
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by Old Gregg » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:51 pm

comes down to whether a ranking of people's opinions of firms they dont work at is better than a ranking of people's opinions of their own firms. i think the latter is not as dangerous a tool in the context of biglaw because of the high degree of associate dissatisfaction. but then again... K&E is #2.

User avatar
Monochromatic Oeuvre

Gold
Posts: 2481
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 9:40 pm

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by Monochromatic Oeuvre » Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:40 pm

To wax poetic about how you're outcome-focused and then stick in a metric like the percent of partners who are women is misleading at best.

Better idea:

40% average associate compensation
10% average partner compensation
25% percent of incoming class making equity partner
25% reputation among in-house recruiters

User avatar
sinfiery

Gold
Posts: 3310
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by sinfiery » Fri Oct 10, 2014 9:09 pm

If this is law firm rankings and not law firms for law student rankings, PPP should be atleast 50% of the rankings

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Old Gregg

Platinum
Posts: 5409
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by Old Gregg » Fri Oct 10, 2014 9:09 pm

sinfiery wrote:If this is law firm rankings and not law firms for law student rankings, PPP should be atleast 50% of the rankings
more like RPL

User avatar
84651846190

Gold
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by 84651846190 » Sat Oct 11, 2014 1:29 am

Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:To wax poetic about how you're outcome-focused and then stick in a metric like the percent of partners who are women is misleading at best.

Better idea:

40% average associate compensation
10% average partner compensation
25% percent of incoming class making equity partner
25% reputation among in-house recruiters
Throw out the recruiters and add something like "percentage of alums serving as judges/tenured profs/general counsel of F500s/heads of prefstigious fed agencies" or something like that.

Recruiters are shitheads who don't know anything about anything, other than they want to sell you on any position they can possibly fit your ass into.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432501
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Oct 11, 2014 7:40 am

my law firm ranking (assuming I didn't fail the bar exam) matches my law school USN rank. The symmetry is pleasing.

911 crisis actor

Bronze
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:03 pm

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by 911 crisis actor » Sat Oct 11, 2014 2:02 pm

Did you enjoy your time at Florida International University Law School

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
jbagelboy

Diamond
Posts: 10361
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by jbagelboy » Sat Oct 11, 2014 5:15 pm

Yukos wrote:Any list that tries to be all things to all people is going to have issues. Seems better than Vault though. At least its methodology is less laughable.
how is this result different from vault tho. seems essentially the same. the V10 are still V10, the V20 are still V20 (w/ munger thrown in). so what if a few of the same firms traded places a few spots. doesn't seem like anyone can break away from vault

honestly lol @ ATL for pulling all these machinations and developing the same list. kind of sad since it perpetuates the unfortunate notion that prestige can proxy for anything

User avatar
sideroxylon

Gold
Posts: 2245
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 2:13 pm

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by sideroxylon » Sat Oct 11, 2014 5:32 pm

jbagelboy wrote:
Yukos wrote:Any list that tries to be all things to all people is going to have issues. Seems better than Vault though. At least its methodology is less laughable.
how is this result different from vault tho. seems essentially the same. the V10 are still V10, the V20 are still V20 (w/ munger thrown in). so what if a few of the same firms traded places a few spots. doesn't seem like anyone can break away from vault

honestly lol @ ATL for pulling all these machinations and developing the same list. kind of sad since it perpetuates the unfortunate notion that prestige can proxy for anything
Paul Weiss, Gibson, Skadden and Weil are all decently removed from their Vault rankings

I guess it's also just a question of how much you expect it to change. I'm sure they could find metrics to put W&C on top or not have Susman somehow down at 87, but I'm not exactly sure how you do that.

User avatar
Sheriff

Bronze
Posts: 265
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2014 2:06 pm

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by Sheriff » Sat Oct 11, 2014 5:33 pm

Cooley in the top 25?! Now I've seen everyTTTThing.

:lol:

User avatar
sideroxylon

Gold
Posts: 2245
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 2:13 pm

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by sideroxylon » Sat Oct 11, 2014 5:34 pm

Sheriff wrote:Cooley in the top 25?! Now I've seen everyTTTThing.

:lol:
I can't tell if you're really unfunny or just really stupid.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Sheriff

Bronze
Posts: 265
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2014 2:06 pm

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by Sheriff » Sat Oct 11, 2014 5:35 pm

sideroxylon wrote:
Sheriff wrote:Cooley in the top 25?! Now I've seen everyTTTThing.

:lol:
I can't tell if you're really unfunny or just really stupid.
Why does it have to be one or the other?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432501
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Oct 11, 2014 5:37 pm

The firm I am going to (one of the ones sideroxlyn mentioned) went up pretty significantly, so I like them.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432501
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Oct 11, 2014 5:40 pm

No Magic Circle firms in the top 100?

Seems legit.

User avatar
sublime

Diamond
Posts: 17385
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by sublime » Sat Oct 11, 2014 5:42 pm

..

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
jbagelboy

Diamond
Posts: 10361
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by jbagelboy » Sat Oct 11, 2014 5:46 pm

sideroxylon wrote:
jbagelboy wrote:
Yukos wrote:Any list that tries to be all things to all people is going to have issues. Seems better than Vault though. At least its methodology is less laughable.
how is this result different from vault tho. seems essentially the same. the V10 are still V10, the V20 are still V20 (w/ munger thrown in). so what if a few of the same firms traded places a few spots. doesn't seem like anyone can break away from vault

honestly lol @ ATL for pulling all these machinations and developing the same list. kind of sad since it perpetuates the unfortunate notion that prestige can proxy for anything
Paul Weiss, Gibson, Skadden and Weil are all decently removed from their Vault rankings

I guess it's also just a question of how much you expect it to change. I'm sure they could find metrics to put W&C on top or not have Susman somehow down at 87, but I'm not exactly sure how you do that.
I wouldn't consider 3 places (or even 7) "decently removed," since vault floats year to year and its all a wash within those 15-20 firms. Also having a non-equity, light track partner class counting as "home grown" partners probably skews kirkland's results pretty heavily, but I doubt anyone cared to distinguish for that metric.

You could establish firms like W&C and Susman on top rather easily by adding a selectivity measure and weighting it heaviest (although this is really silly as well). You're right though, why expect more. I guess I'm just always disappointed by ATL when it tries to rank things, pretending its lists will be so much more accurate and sincere than the dominant available commercial ranking but then essentially replicating them.

User avatar
sublime

Diamond
Posts: 17385
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by sublime » Sat Oct 11, 2014 5:48 pm

..

User avatar
wiz

Diamond
Posts: 44572
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 11:25 pm

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by wiz » Sat Oct 11, 2014 5:51 pm

Poor White & Case

Lord Randolph McDuff

Gold
Posts: 1592
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:37 pm

Re: above the law is doing firm rankings now?

Post by Lord Randolph McDuff » Sat Oct 11, 2014 5:52 pm

Above the law has completely sold out. When I started reading them five years ago they correctly recognized that rankings were harmful to the legal field. Now they rank everything.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”