Torn between the two. I'm interested broadly in litigation, although I'd ideally like to be able to work in both trial and appellate litigation. Chambers & Partners seems to suggest Skadden is the better litigation firm (Band 2 vs Band 4), but AmLaw has consistently ranked O'Melveny more highly over the last decade in its 'Litigation Department of the Year' awards.
For what it's worth, I like the people in both firm pretty well. I probably get along better with the people I've met at Skadden, though.
Thoughts?
Skadden (DC) vs O'Melveny (DC) Lit Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
FSK
- Posts: 8058
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 2:47 pm
Check out top-law-schools.com
Check out top-law-schools.com
