WSGR v Cooley Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432432
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

WSGR v Cooley

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Sep 20, 2014 5:21 pm

Having trouble deciding between these two places for corporate: WSGR in Palo Alto and one of Cooley's non-Palo Alto CA offices. Interested in emerging companies work. Worry that I might be limiting my options down the road by not starting out in Palo Alto.

Loved the people at Cooley, but also liked WSGR when I visited. Have heard that Cooley is more reasonable as far as hours and that WSGR can have a reputation for being a sweatshop, but not sure how that bears out in practice. WSGR seems to be the bigger name and offer stronger exit options, but Cooley also looks to be on the rise. Also, somewhat hesitant because of the siloing of work in WSGR's corporate group.

User avatar
bananasplit19

Silver
Posts: 687
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:53 pm

Re: WSGR v Cooley

Post by bananasplit19 » Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:15 pm

Anonymous User wrote:somewhat hesitant because of the siloing of work in WSGR's corporate group.
The corporate group, from what I hear, no longer uses the silo system. You're a generalist for a couple years. Note that it sounds like the silo system is still in place for the other practice groups (TTG, lit, patent, etc.).

Any geographic preferences? If not, I vote WSGR because for emerging companies, they'll be on at least a par with any Cooley office, including Palo Alto, San Diego, or Boston. If you aren't going to any of those offices, then Wilson will definitely give you better opportunities to do the work you're interested.

User avatar
Old Gregg

Platinum
Posts: 5409
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: WSGR v Cooley

Post by Old Gregg » Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:29 pm

Note that it sounds like the silo system is still in place for the other practice groups (TTG, lit, patent, etc.).
Silo-ing exists for all groups. The only change is that juniors aren't immediately placed in one.

User avatar
OneMoreLawHopeful

Silver
Posts: 1191
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 6:21 pm

Re: WSGR v Cooley

Post by OneMoreLawHopeful » Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:38 pm

I know someone who summered at Cooley Palo Alto in 2012, and he said the summers were told from day 1 that they had to earn an offer and there would likely be at least 1 no-offer. It worked out for him, and looking at NALP, it's not like Cooley made a ton of no-offers (3 out of 45). Nonetheless that just seems like unneeded stress. It also made relationships among the summer strained at times.

Also, I know you're considering a different office of Cooley; and I get that many firms are full of shit when they tell their summer class "There's room for everyone!", but overall that still sounds like a situation I would avoid.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432432
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: WSGR v Cooley

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Sep 21, 2014 9:58 pm

roshambo?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”