GULC class size confusion Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

GULC class size confusion

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Sep 12, 2014 4:17 pm

I'm confused about some law school transparency numbers related to GULC. If you look at the job trend info http://www.lstscorereports.com/schools/ ... ends/2013/ it looks like there 645 graduates in 2013, but if you look at the key stats tab, there were never even 600 entering L1s since 2010. Where did the other the additional graduates come from? It's not the part-time people, because those seem to be included as L1s at LST. They list 544 for the 2013 entering class, and GULC lists 546 including part-time in their own website http://www.law.georgetown.edu/admission ... eneral.cfm. Given that there should be at least some attrition for every class, why is there a higher number? Someone more knowledgeable than me know?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC class size confusion

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Sep 12, 2014 4:21 pm

Anonymous User wrote:I'm confused about some law school transparency numbers related to GULC. If you look at the job trend info http://www.lstscorereports.com/schools/ ... ends/2013/ it looks like there 645 graduates in 2013, but if you look at the key stats tab, there were never even 600 entering L1s since 2010. Where did the other the additional graduates come from? It's not the part-time people, because those seem to be included as L1s at LST. They list 544 for the 2013 entering class, and GULC lists 546 including part-time in their own website http://www.law.georgetown.edu/admission ... eneral.cfm. Given that there should be at least some attrition for every class, why is there a higher number? Someone more knowledgeable than me know?
Transfers..gulc will take anyone

Paul Campos

Silver
Posts: 688
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:44 am

Re: GULC class size confusion

Post by Paul Campos » Fri Sep 12, 2014 5:00 pm

Transfers into GULC:

2010: 61

2011: 71

2012: 85

2013: 122

2014: ???

Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GULC class size confusion

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:55 pm

Well that makes sense in terms of numbers, but what's the rationale for accepting more transfers?

User avatar
loomy78

Bronze
Posts: 325
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 5:15 am

Re: GULC class size confusion

Post by loomy78 » Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:56 pm

$

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


arklaw13

Gold
Posts: 1862
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:36 pm

Re: GULC class size confusion

Post by arklaw13 » Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:56 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Well that makes sense in terms of numbers, but what's the rationale for accepting more transfers?
$$$ without worrying about us news rankings

Mal Reynolds

Diamond
Posts: 12612
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am

Re: GULC class size confusion

Post by Mal Reynolds » Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:59 pm

Paul Campos wrote:Transfers into GULC:

2010: 61

2011: 71

2012: 85

2013: 122

2014: ???
122?? LOLOLOLOL

User avatar
baal hadad

Gold
Posts: 3167
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:57 pm

Re: GULC class size confusion

Post by baal hadad » Sat Sep 13, 2014 12:31 am

Mal Reynolds wrote:
Paul Campos wrote:Transfers into GULC:

2010: 61

2011: 71

2012: 85

2013: 122

2014: ???
122?? LOLOLOLOL
Ljl bro

User avatar
84651846190

Gold
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm

Re: GULC class size confusion

Post by 84651846190 » Sat Sep 13, 2014 12:35 am

el jay el

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”