Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings: Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
Cadwalader's placement. What a ragtag team of incompetent shitbags. Anon because they're on the other side and if they're reading this, may very well be able to narrow it down to the 50 or so lawyers they're fucking tonight with their incompetent shitbaggery.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
Anonymous User wrote:Cadwalader's placement. What a ragtag team of incompetent shitbags. Anon because they're on the other side and if they're reading this, may very well be able to narrow it down to the 50 or so lawyers they're fucking tonight with their incompetent shitbaggery.
What does this mean
-
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
Counterpoint: if you work at Cadwalader then you never have to work across from them.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
OP..
You can't just flamebag a firm and not elaborate on the specifics
You can't just flamebag a firm and not elaborate on the specifics
- glitter178
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:21 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
I'm guessing someone had plans they had to cancel tonight
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- banjo
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
OP is just bragging that he has a biglaw job.
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:50 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
50 people firm in either new york, dc, or charlotte... hope you realize they can track you down by that and the fact they just gave your firm something
- NinerFan
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:51 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
I'm just gonna go on the record and second that opinion that Cadwalader is awful.
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
Presumably he could be part of a 50 person team at a larger firm.Anonymous User wrote:50 people firm in either new york, dc, or charlotte... hope you realize they can track you down by that and the fact they just gave your firm something
- Pokemon
- Posts: 3528
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:58 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
Have heartd that Cad has actually gotten much better and have worked specifically on improving their rep.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
even so, what is the point of being anon if he just gave away the fact that cadwalader gave his team work for tonight?wert3813 wrote:Presumably he could be part of a 50 person team at a larger firm.Anonymous User wrote:50 people firm in either new york, dc, or charlotte... hope you realize they can track you down by that and the fact they just gave your firm something
fwiw, it's an okay firm. at least aspirations to become partner there is not a running joke (skadden...)
- Elston Gunn
- Posts: 3820
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:09 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
I feel like you don't understand the core concept of anonymous posting.Anonymous User wrote:even so, what is the point of being anon if he just gave away the fact that cadwalader gave his team work for tonight?wert3813 wrote:Presumably he could be part of a 50 person team at a larger firm.Anonymous User wrote:50 people firm in either new york, dc, or charlotte... hope you realize they can track you down by that and the fact they just gave your firm something
fwiw, it's an okay firm. at least aspirations to become partner there is not a running joke (skadden...)
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
lol.Elston Gunn wrote:I feel like you don't understand the core concept of anonymous posting.Anonymous User wrote:even so, what is the point of being anon if he just gave away the fact that cadwalader gave his team work for tonight?wert3813 wrote:Presumably he could be part of a 50 person team at a larger firm.Anonymous User wrote:50 people firm in either new york, dc, or charlotte... hope you realize they can track you down by that and the fact they just gave your firm something
fwiw, it's an okay firm. at least aspirations to become partner there is not a running joke (skadden...)
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
It was a joke implying that they are fucking a few different juniors on a large number of matters through their irredeemable incompetence. There is obviously no way they could figure out who exactly they pissed off when their MO is to piss off everyone, and not out of fucking strategic brilliancewert3813 wrote:Presumably he could be part of a 50 person team at a larger firm.Anonymous User wrote:50 people firm in either new york, dc, or charlotte... hope you realize they can track you down by that and the fact they just gave your firm something
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
omg lol lol lol yes go to Cadwalader instead of Skadden because your end goal is to make partnerAnonymous User wrote:
fwiw, it's an okay firm. at least aspirations to become partner there is not a running joke (skadden...)
That's amazing tell another one
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
cadwalader's attorneys seemed nicer when i visited. skadden was just cold and kept talking about exit options. (what is the point of going to a top law school if you aren't even trying to be partner?)Anonymous User wrote:omg lol lol lol yes go to Cadwalader instead of Skadden because your end goal is to make partnerAnonymous User wrote:
fwiw, it's an okay firm. at least aspirations to become partner there is not a running joke (skadden...)
That's amazing tell another one
-
- Posts: 16094
- Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 5:06 am
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
Ignore the haters, you'll make partnerAnonymous User wrote:cadwalader's attorneys seemed nicer when i visited. skadden was just cold and kept talking about exit options. (what is the point of going to a top law school if you aren't even trying to be partner?)Anonymous User wrote:omg lol lol lol yes go to Cadwalader instead of Skadden because your end goal is to make partnerAnonymous User wrote:
fwiw, it's an okay firm. at least aspirations to become partner there is not a running joke (skadden...)
That's amazing tell another one
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- StylinNProfilin
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
This indictment was not stunning
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
If you're not a real person, please never say so, because I love thinking you're real.Anonymous User wrote: cadwalader's attorneys seemed nicer when i visited. skadden was just cold and kept talking about exit options. (what is the point of going to a top law school if you aren't even trying to be partner?)
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
Spoken like someone who has never dealt with CadwaladerStylinNProfilin wrote:This indictment was not stunning
- baal hadad
- Posts: 3167
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:57 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
It's funny bc when I was researching Cadwalader a couple years ago for OCI they were making 0 partners and only taking lateral partnerAnonymous User wrote:cadwalader's attorneys seemed nicer when i visited. skadden was just cold and kept talking about exit options. (what is the point of going to a top law school if you aren't even trying to be partner?)Anonymous User wrote:omg lol lol lol yes go to Cadwalader instead of Skadden because your end goal is to make partnerAnonymous User wrote:
fwiw, it's an okay firm. at least aspirations to become partner there is not a running joke (skadden...)
That's amazing tell another one
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- baal hadad
- Posts: 3167
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:57 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
The most stunning indictment of Vault is that SRZ is ranked so low despite its peerlessness in funds work
- StylinNProfilin
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
I thought the Vault rankings directly correlated with how much it sucks to work there. My bad.Anonymous User wrote:Spoken like someone who has never dealt with CadwaladerStylinNProfilin wrote:This indictment was not stunning
-
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 2:08 am
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
Just based on this running joke, in 5 years SRZ will have jumped up into the V10 on TLS trolling alone. And that, folks, will be the real stunning indictment of vault rankings.baal hadad wrote:The most stunning indictment of Vault is that SRZ is ranked so low despite its peerlessness in funds work
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Most stunning indictment of VAULT rankings:
As someone who did CBs at both Cadwalader and SRZ, I don't really get the SRZ hate on here. I mean, they're a super profitable firm who paid above-market bonuses, and its not like (except for that one dude) they really have people trolling for them on here.NoLongerALurker wrote:Just based on this running joke, in 5 years SRZ will have jumped up into the V10 on TLS trolling alone. And that, folks, will be the real stunning indictment of vault rankings.baal hadad wrote:The most stunning indictment of Vault is that SRZ is ranked so low despite its peerlessness in funds work
On the other hand, agree with OP: Fuck Cadwalader, worst place I interviewed at. I'd rather work at Skadden or even SullCrom than there
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login