"Conflicts Checks" Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

"Conflicts Checks"

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:30 pm

Law firms, in their acceptance letters, almost always say they will do (1) a background check and (2) a conflicts check. What exactly does the "conflicts check" entail? Thanks.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: "Conflicts Checks"

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:38 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Law firms, in their acceptance letters, almost always say they will do (1) a background check and (2) a conflicts check. What exactly does the "conflicts check" entail? Thanks.
A check to see if you have ethics conflicts with firm clients. If you summered at MoFo and worked on Apple V. Samsung Litigation, Quinn Emanuel can't hire you without giving up Samsung as the client.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: "Conflicts Checks"

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:41 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Law firms, in their acceptance letters, almost always say they will do (1) a background check and (2) a conflicts check. What exactly does the "conflicts check" entail? Thanks.
A check to see if you have ethics conflicts with firm clients. If you summered at MoFo and worked on Apple V. Samsung Litigation, Quinn Emanuel can't hire you without giving up Samsung as the client.
So I'm guessing that working in a clinic that represents low-income clients should probs be okay?

User avatar
Desert Fox

Diamond
Posts: 18283
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 4:34 pm

Re: "Conflicts Checks"

Post by Desert Fox » Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:48 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Law firms, in their acceptance letters, almost always say they will do (1) a background check and (2) a conflicts check. What exactly does the "conflicts check" entail? Thanks.
A check to see if you have ethics conflicts with firm clients. If you summered at MoFo and worked on Apple V. Samsung Litigation, Quinn Emanuel can't hire you without giving up Samsung as the client.
So I'm guessing that working in a clinic that represents low-income clients should probs be okay?
It's rarely an issue for SA and first year hiring.
Last edited by Desert Fox on Sat Jan 27, 2018 6:10 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
2014

Platinum
Posts: 6028
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Re: "Conflicts Checks"

Post by 2014 » Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:05 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Law firms, in their acceptance letters, almost always say they will do (1) a background check and (2) a conflicts check. What exactly does the "conflicts check" entail? Thanks.
A check to see if you have ethics conflicts with firm clients. If you summered at MoFo and worked on Apple V. Samsung Litigation, Quinn Emanuel can't hire you without giving up Samsung as the client.
Uh no they will just put up a Chinese Wall, it happens all the time.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: "Conflicts Checks"

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:07 pm

2014 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Law firms, in their acceptance letters, almost always say they will do (1) a background check and (2) a conflicts check. What exactly does the "conflicts check" entail? Thanks.
A check to see if you have ethics conflicts with firm clients. If you summered at MoFo and worked on Apple V. Samsung Litigation, Quinn Emanuel can't hire you without giving up Samsung as the client.
Uh no they will just put up a Chinese Wall, it happens all the time.
What would be the point of saying your employment is contingent upon passing a "conflict check" if they could just put up this Chinese Wall thingy?

User avatar
2014

Platinum
Posts: 6028
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Re: "Conflicts Checks"

Post by 2014 » Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:12 pm

Because if you are conflicted out of a critical mass of the firm's business surely it just isn't worth it anymore. I wasn't refuting that conflict checks matter only the assumption that if they hire you they have to boot the client. Most people can just go about their business and get staffed on other things.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: "Conflicts Checks"

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:13 pm

2014 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Law firms, in their acceptance letters, almost always say they will do (1) a background check and (2) a conflicts check. What exactly does the "conflicts check" entail? Thanks.
A check to see if you have ethics conflicts with firm clients. If you summered at MoFo and worked on Apple V. Samsung Litigation, Quinn Emanuel can't hire you without giving up Samsung as the client.
Uh no they will just put up a Chinese Wall, it happens all the time.
This isn't entirely true and it depends on what the ethical rules in your state are. Where I am, it's unethical to accept employment when you have a conflict of interest based on work at another firm (I think it applies likewise to a firm extending employment). The "wall" isn't enough, the firm you're applying to also has to obtain conflict waivers from the client causing the conflict. I had a CB at a firm for a 2L job cancelled the day before it happened because my work at a 1L firm created a conflict. It was easier for the firm to just move on to the next candidate rather than worry about getting the waivers.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: "Conflicts Checks"

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:29 pm

2014 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Law firms, in their acceptance letters, almost always say they will do (1) a background check and (2) a conflicts check. What exactly does the "conflicts check" entail? Thanks.
A check to see if you have ethics conflicts with firm clients. If you summered at MoFo and worked on Apple V. Samsung Litigation, Quinn Emanuel can't hire you without giving up Samsung as the client.
Uh no they will just put up a Chinese Wall, it happens all the time.
Aren't there levels of conflict too high for a Chinese wall?

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
JamMasterJ

Platinum
Posts: 6649
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: "Conflicts Checks"

Post by JamMasterJ » Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:51 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
2014 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Law firms, in their acceptance letters, almost always say they will do (1) a background check and (2) a conflicts check. What exactly does the "conflicts check" entail? Thanks.
A check to see if you have ethics conflicts with firm clients. If you summered at MoFo and worked on Apple V. Samsung Litigation, Quinn Emanuel can't hire you without giving up Samsung as the client.
Uh no they will just put up a Chinese Wall, it happens all the time.
Aren't there levels of conflict too high for a Chinese wall?
yes but as a summer, it's highly doubtful you trigger them

User avatar
tww909

Bronze
Posts: 247
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:41 am

Re: "Conflicts Checks"

Post by tww909 » Tue Sep 09, 2014 10:10 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
2014 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Law firms, in their acceptance letters, almost always say they will do (1) a background check and (2) a conflicts check. What exactly does the "conflicts check" entail? Thanks.
A check to see if you have ethics conflicts with firm clients. If you summered at MoFo and worked on Apple V. Samsung Litigation, Quinn Emanuel can't hire you without giving up Samsung as the client.
Uh no they will just put up a Chinese Wall, it happens all the time.
This isn't entirely true and it depends on what the ethical rules in your state are. Where I am, it's unethical to accept employment when you have a conflict of interest based on work at another firm (I think it applies likewise to a firm extending employment). The "wall" isn't enough, the firm you're applying to also has to obtain conflict waivers from the client causing the conflict. I had a CB at a firm for a 2L job cancelled the day before it happened because my work at a 1L firm created a conflict. It was easier for the firm to just move on to the next candidate rather than worry about getting the waivers.
What jurisdiction is this?

User avatar
dood

Gold
Posts: 1639
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:59 am

Re: "Conflicts Checks"

Post by dood » Tue Sep 09, 2014 10:29 pm

fyi say ethical wall, not chinese wall to people are your firm, not very PC anymore

User avatar
BVest

Platinum
Posts: 7887
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: "Conflicts Checks"

Post by BVest » Tue Sep 09, 2014 11:09 pm

dood wrote:fyi say ethical wall, not chinese wall to people are your firm, not very PC anymore
Can't tell if srs.
Last edited by BVest on Sat Jan 27, 2018 6:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
dood

Gold
Posts: 1639
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:59 am

Re: "Conflicts Checks"

Post by dood » Wed Sep 10, 2014 6:01 pm

BVest wrote:
dood wrote:fyi say ethical wall, not chinese wall to people are your firm, not very PC anymore
Can't tell if srs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_wall

In Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Superior Court 200 Cal.App.3d 272, 293–294, 245 Cal.Rptr. 873, 887–888 (1988), Presiding Justice Low wrote:
The term has an ethnic focus which many would consider a subtle form of linguistic discrimination. Certainly, the continued use of the term would be insensitive to the ethnic identity of the many persons of Chinese descent. Modern courts should not perpetuate the biases which creep into language from outmoded, and more primitive, ways of thought.

no, i didnt edit the wiki page, but stupid quotes aside, just trust me bro, better safe than sorry

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”