Skadden LA vs. Latham LA Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Skadden or Latham

Skadden
20
41%
Latham
29
59%
 
Total votes: 49

Anonymous User
Posts: 432509
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 09, 2014 11:15 am

Title says it all. Interest is in corporate transactional work (leaning M&A but not positive). Especially interested in any insight regarding differences in office culture/dynamics/etc. but all relevant info is relevant.

Thanks all.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432509
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 09, 2014 11:36 am

I got the impression that Latham's other offices were more integrated and as a result you were afforded way more flexibility (i.e., start in LA but move down to Orange County because you wanna do inversions and live in the OC). Could be a marketing gimmick though, I have no idea. I really, really enjoyed my Latham LA CB though and I get the impression that you will have much better institutional support starting in Latham's LA office as opposed to Skadden's LA office.

User avatar
WhirledWorld

Bronze
Posts: 332
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:04 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by WhirledWorld » Tue Sep 09, 2014 11:44 am

If Chambers ranks them both in band 1 for NorCal/SoCal M&A, I guess your decision should entirely come down to fit. Unless you're interested in PE M&A -- then go with Skadden -- or VC -- then go with Latham.

http://www.chambersandpartners.com/1602 ... torial/5/1

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by rpupkin » Tue Sep 09, 2014 11:58 am

Anonymous User wrote: I really, really enjoyed my Latham LA CB though and I get the impression that you will have much better institutional support starting in Latham's LA office as opposed to Skadden's LA office.
I haven't worked at either firm, but I seriously doubt that Latham has "much better institutional support" than Skadden, in LA or elsewhere. In any event, I don't know how one could make a meaningful comparison of institutional support based on a frickin callback.

User avatar
PvblivsScipio

Bronze
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:41 pm

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by PvblivsScipio » Tue Sep 09, 2014 12:44 pm

Anonymous User wrote: and live in the OC
Don't call it that.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432509
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 09, 2014 3:23 pm

Both are band 1 in pretty much all transactional practices, so it will really come down to fit. I chose Latham because I loved everyone I met.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432509
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 09, 2014 3:55 pm

rpupkin wrote:
Anonymous User wrote: I really, really enjoyed my Latham LA CB though and I get the impression that you will have much better institutional support starting in Latham's LA office as opposed to Skadden's LA office.
I haven't worked at either firm, but I seriously doubt that Latham has "much better institutional support" than Skadden, in LA or elsewhere. In any event, I don't know how one could make a meaningful comparison of institutional support based on a frickin callback.
Let me clarify. Latham's office in LA is nearly double the size of Skadden's. The Skadden LA office felt tiny to me. For what it's worth that may be because I received my Skadden offer through Skadden NYC which is just an entirely different beast on its own. I was visiting the Skadden LA office to check things out and weigh the possibility of splitting my summer there. I'm not 100% familiar with how Skadden is structured, but I get the impression that Skadden's separate offices operate as their own profit centers (as opposed to Latham who claims that all profits are shared across all offices). In any case, I felt like the Skadden NYC office has a big swinging dick compared to Skadden's LA office whereas I felt like there wasn't a meaningful difference between Latham's LA office and their NYC office in terms of inter-office politics.

So by institutional support I meant that I'd feel like a Latham LA associate would feel closer to Latham generally than a Skadden LA associate would feel towards Skadden generally. Obviously my own opinion that's based off just a callback and a few second looks and I wouldn't make a decision based solely on this alone but this is my 2 cents.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432509
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 09, 2014 3:58 pm

OP here. Thanks for the replies.

Can anyone speak to the difference in office cultures? I know Skadden LA gets an intense reputation, but I feel like biglaw is biglaw to some extent and that the reputation that precedes the office might be overblown. Might.

Also, as far as both longevity at the firm and options afterwards are concerned, are the two about equal?

Also curious how the feel is at Skadden in terms of being subordinate to NY to some extent.

Hard to tell any of this from a callback, honestly.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432509
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 09, 2014 4:17 pm

Anonymous User wrote:OP here. Thanks for the replies.

Can anyone speak to the difference in office cultures? I know Skadden LA gets an intense reputation, but I feel like biglaw is biglaw to some extent and that the reputation that precedes the office might be overblown. Might.

Also, as far as both longevity at the firm and options afterwards are concerned, are the two about equal?

Also curious how the feel is at Skadden in terms of being subordinate to NY to some extent.

Hard to tell any of this from a callback, honestly.
I'm the anon who will be summering at Latham LA this upcoming summer. From what I can tell (obviously I can't be 100% sure) the general culture is very outgoing and social. It appears to be a work-hard, play-hard sort of deal, and the firm very much encourages "group bonding" sorts of things. For example, all Latham summers from all over the world meet for 4 days at a hotel in Beverly Hills for a sort of convention-type thing. During my callback one of the associates said that she sometimes came in to the office even when she didn't need to just so she could see all of her friends. I personally met over 10 people who work at Latham (both inside and outside of the formal interview process) and liked literally every single one. I also know a summer associate from last summer who really enjoyed everything about the firm. Obviously I am biased, but I am pretty stoked to be working there next summer.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Anonymous User
Posts: 432509
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 09, 2014 5:29 pm

OP here. Interesting info and confirms previous thoughts on Latham's office culture.

For those saying Skadden, what is the rationale?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432509
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 09, 2014 5:34 pm

WhirledWorld wrote:If Chambers ranks them both in band 1 for NorCal/SoCal M&A, I guess your decision should entirely come down to fit. Unless you're interested in PE M&A -- then go with Skadden -- or VC -- then go with Latham.

http://www.chambersandpartners.com/1602 ... torial/5/1
I may be completely fucking up, but aren't Latham and Skadden both in Band 2 for PE M&A?

User avatar
PvblivsScipio

Bronze
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:41 pm

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by PvblivsScipio » Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:19 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:OP here. Thanks for the replies.

Can anyone speak to the difference in office cultures? I know Skadden LA gets an intense reputation, but I feel like biglaw is biglaw to some extent and that the reputation that precedes the office might be overblown. Might.

Also, as far as both longevity at the firm and options afterwards are concerned, are the two about equal?

Also curious how the feel is at Skadden in terms of being subordinate to NY to some extent.

Hard to tell any of this from a callback, honestly.
I'm the anon who will be summering at Latham LA this upcoming summer. From what I can tell (obviously I can't be 100% sure) the general culture is very outgoing and social. It appears to be a work-hard, play-hard sort of deal, and the firm very much encourages "group bonding" sorts of things. For example, all Latham summers from all over the world meet for 4 days at a hotel in Beverly Hills for a sort of convention-type thing. During my callback one of the associates said that she sometimes came in to the office even when she didn't need to just so she could see all of her friends. I personally met over 10 people who work at Latham (both inside and outside of the formal interview process) and liked literally every single one. I also know a summer associate from last summer who really enjoyed everything about the firm. Obviously I am biased, but I am pretty stoked to be working there next summer.
lol you're gonna get rocked hard if you think that's how associates are treated.

User avatar
Cobretti

Gold
Posts: 2593
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by Cobretti » Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:40 pm

PvblivsScipio wrote:
Anonymous User wrote: and live in the OC
Don't call it that.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432509
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by Anonymous User » Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:45 pm

PvblivsScipio wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:OP here. Thanks for the replies.

Can anyone speak to the difference in office cultures? I know Skadden LA gets an intense reputation, but I feel like biglaw is biglaw to some extent and that the reputation that precedes the office might be overblown. Might.

Also, as far as both longevity at the firm and options afterwards are concerned, are the two about equal?

Also curious how the feel is at Skadden in terms of being subordinate to NY to some extent.

Hard to tell any of this from a callback, honestly.
I'm the anon who will be summering at Latham LA this upcoming summer. From what I can tell (obviously I can't be 100% sure) the general culture is very outgoing and social. It appears to be a work-hard, play-hard sort of deal, and the firm very much encourages "group bonding" sorts of things. For example, all Latham summers from all over the world meet for 4 days at a hotel in Beverly Hills for a sort of convention-type thing. During my callback one of the associates said that she sometimes came in to the office even when she didn't need to just so she could see all of her friends. I personally met over 10 people who work at Latham (both inside and outside of the formal interview process) and liked literally every single one. I also know a summer associate from last summer who really enjoyed everything about the firm. Obviously I am biased, but I am pretty stoked to be working there next summer.
lol you're gonna get rocked hard if you think that's how associates are treated.
I never said I thought that was how associates are treated. I simply wanted to illustrate that it appears that they want to encourage camaraderie to an extent. Obviously I am going to be grinding at any biglaw firm. I am by no means ignorant of what lies ahead, I'd just like to spend long hours with people I like being around.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432509
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 10, 2014 12:49 am

So no thoughts at all on why anyone would take Skadden over Latham in LA?

I guess this forum skews towards NY so maybe no one has enough experience to say, but if there's any insight out there I'd love to hear it.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432509
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 10, 2014 12:58 am

Anonymous User wrote:So no thoughts at all on why anyone would take Skadden over Latham in LA?

I guess this forum skews towards NY so maybe no one has enough experience to say, but if there's any insight out there I'd love to hear it.
i think you hit the nail on the head there. they seem comparable enough that you should really be basing your decision on fit. do your second looks and pull the trigger, GL.

User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5653
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by rpupkin » Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:24 am

Anonymous User wrote:So no thoughts at all on why anyone would take Skadden over Latham in LA?

I guess this forum skews towards NY so maybe no one has enough experience to say, but if there's any insight out there I'd love to hear it.
I don't have an opinion on your decision, but I will share this: I know someone who got no-offered at Latham LA due to "fit." 2L grades were fine, work product was fine (or so she was told), but the firm didn't like her "performance" at social events. Maybe this kind of no-offer happens at Skadden (and other firms) as well, but I've only heard of it happening at Latham.

This is, of course, just an anecdote. But since you're hunting for reasons to take Skadden over Latham, you might want to look a little further into the possibility that Latham is more willing to no-offer SAs.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anonymous User
Posts: 432509
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:30 am

rpupkin wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:So no thoughts at all on why anyone would take Skadden over Latham in LA?

I guess this forum skews towards NY so maybe no one has enough experience to say, but if there's any insight out there I'd love to hear it.
I don't have an opinion on your decision, but I will share this: I know someone who got no-offered at Latham LA due to "fit." 2L grades were fine, work product was fine (or so she was told), but the firm didn't like her "performance" at social events. Maybe this kind of no-offer happens at Skadden (and other firms) as well, but I've only heard of it happening at Latham.

This is, of course, just an anecdote. But since you're hunting for reasons to take Skadden over Latham, you might want to look a little further into the possibility that Latham is more willing to no-offer SAs.
Or straight up "Latham" people...meaning lay-off herds of attorneys like they did not too long ago. People have short memories it seems.

User avatar
KD35

Silver
Posts: 950
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:30 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by KD35 » Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:35 am

From meeting attorneys at each in interviews, Latham seemed like a better place to be for more outgoing people. Skadden LA seemed to fail at hiding the fact that their life completely sucks, which meant to me that they may not be as positive of people to be around as Latham LA.

TL;DR fit.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432509
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 10, 2014 3:23 am

rpupkin wrote:I know someone who got no-offered at Latham LA due to "fit." . . . since you're hunting for reasons to take Skadden over Latham, you might want to look a little further into the possibility that Latham is more willing to no-offer SAs.
Curious about this. How long ago did the no-offer happen? Vault data for 2013 shows Latham as having offered 148/149, and Skadden 146/148.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432509
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 10, 2014 11:21 am

OP here.

Skadden people also struck me as pretty damn outgoing but maybe I just met the outgoing bunch. For what it's worth, I found the people I met at both firms near equally as social seeming.

Are hours/exit options theoretically the same? (my guess would be yes to both)

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432509
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 10, 2014 11:24 am

rpupkin wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:So no thoughts at all on why anyone would take Skadden over Latham in LA?

I guess this forum skews towards NY so maybe no one has enough experience to say, but if there's any insight out there I'd love to hear it.
I don't have an opinion on your decision, but I will share this: I know someone who got no-offered at Latham LA due to "fit." 2L grades were fine, work product was fine (or so she was told), but the firm didn't like her "performance" at social events. Maybe this kind of no-offer happens at Skadden (and other firms) as well, but I've only heard of it happening at Latham.

This is, of course, just an anecdote. But since you're hunting for reasons to take Skadden over Latham, you might want to look a little further into the possibility that Latham is more willing to no-offer SAs.
Latham offered 100% this last summer

Anonymous User
Posts: 432509
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Sep 10, 2014 11:29 am

Anonymous User wrote:OP here.

Skadden people also struck me as pretty damn outgoing but maybe I just met the outgoing bunch. For what it's worth, I found the people I met at both firms near equally as social seeming.

Are hours/exit options theoretically the same? (my guess would be yes to both)
I would imagine exit options are pretty much the same, though it could likely depend on specific clients of the firm. I have anecdotally heard that Skadden LA associates work atypically hard. However, I don't know how much anecdotal evidence really conforms to reality.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432509
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 11, 2014 12:29 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:OP here.

Skadden people also struck me as pretty damn outgoing but maybe I just met the outgoing bunch. For what it's worth, I found the people I met at both firms near equally as social seeming.

Are hours/exit options theoretically the same? (my guess would be yes to both)
I would imagine exit options are pretty much the same, though it could likely depend on specific clients of the firm. I have anecdotally heard that Skadden LA associates work atypically hard. However, I don't know how much anecdotal evidence really conforms to reality.
Interesting.

Thanks for the response.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432509
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Skadden LA vs. Latham LA

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Sep 15, 2014 2:28 am

Any final thoughts?

Decision must be made tomorrow and so far it seems like Latham=better QOL, Skadden=better transactional work (to oversimplify).

Torn.

Munger is also in the mix.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”