California v. Texas For Biglaw Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432506
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

California v. Texas For Biglaw

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Sep 07, 2014 11:28 pm

At a T14 and very fortunate to have offers on the table in CA, TX and NY. Currently self-financing LS so no debt at present, but will probably have to take out loans for 3L. Undecided between lit and transactional work. I'd like to try and make it 3 years in biglaw. No desire for partner track. Still relatively young & also single.

CA offers are in LA, TX offers in Dallas and Houston. Can anyone comment on the general differences, if any, in terms of quality of life, working hours, formality, dress code, and attitudes toward facetime and vacation between CA and TX biglaw?

User avatar
glitter178

Silver
Posts: 775
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:21 pm

Re: California v. Texas For Biglaw

Post by glitter178 » Sun Sep 07, 2014 11:34 pm

Not that this has anything to do with the work, but in Texas you could actually own a really nice house before you're forty.

gchatbrah

Bronze
Posts: 134
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2013 11:26 am

Re: California v. Texas For Biglaw

Post by gchatbrah » Sun Sep 07, 2014 11:40 pm

which firms? might play a non-trivial role in this decision.

ny/tx probably better for transactional from a career perspective. don't know about lit.

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: California v. Texas For Biglaw

Post by BigZuck » Mon Sep 08, 2014 12:06 am

Say the firms dude, you're anon. This is much too broad.

Speaking in much too broad terms, the TX firms will probably be more formal and require more facetime, but your quality of life might be better because your money will go farther. Then again, you'll be in TX, not CA. That might matter to you. Guessing you'll probably have to bill about the same amount.

User avatar
Balthy

Silver
Posts: 665
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 12:28 pm

Re: California v. Texas For Biglaw

Post by Balthy » Mon Sep 08, 2014 12:09 am

OP, mind PMing me? Just curious about how you landed these options.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”