Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Which Firm

Schulte
22
37%
Fried Frank
25
42%
Decher
12
20%
 
Total votes: 59

Anonymous User
Posts: 432828
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Sep 07, 2014 1:26 pm

Hey guys. I'm still waiting on some places to trickle in, but for now I'm making a choice between FF and SRZ. I'm interested in transactional work generally but beyond that, not sure (maybe M&A, Real Estate, or Tax - it seemed like the firms are strong in the same areas but that FF is better in all except investment fund stuff). FF seemed a bit "stiff" but other than that I had pretty similar impressions of the cultures on net, though FF seemed a little more laid back. I'm mostly looking for best quality of experience/exit opps. I have one concern in that over the past year or so, I've heard some instability rumors regarding FF, so if true, that's a concern (I'm going to talk to CSO and try to get in touch with FF alums of my school to determine whether it's true).

Eta: dechert offer.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Fri Sep 12, 2014 9:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Swimp

Bronze
Posts: 493
Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank

Post by Swimp » Sun Sep 07, 2014 6:19 pm

Do you have a strong interest in hedge fund work? If not, FF seems like the pretty clear choice here. I'm actually a little surprised the voting is so even.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432828
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Sep 08, 2014 9:29 am

bump. Rationale behind the SRZ votes?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432828
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:17 am

Also, and I don't mean to come off as entitled, but should I do my scheduled callbacks at Dechert and McDermott NY? I'm not really sure where those two fall on the spectrum.

Swimp

Bronze
Posts: 493
Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank

Post by Swimp » Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:33 am

Anonymous User wrote:Also, and I don't mean to come off as entitled, but should I do my scheduled callbacks at Dechert and McDermott NY? I'm not really sure where those two fall on the spectrum.
It wouldn't be crazy to take either of those places over FF or SRZ. I'd do the callbacks.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


hephaestus

Gold
Posts: 2399
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank

Post by hephaestus » Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:08 am

Swimp wrote:Do you have a strong interest in hedge fund work? If not, FF seems like the pretty clear choice here. I'm actually a little surprised the voting is so even.
I think FF is the better choice, unless you really want to do funds work. FF has a top notch corporate practice in NYC that is not properly reflected in its Vault ranking. Additionally, they have consistently given 100% offers.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432828
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Sep 08, 2014 12:26 pm

ImNoScar wrote:
Swimp wrote:Do you have a strong interest in hedge fund work? If not, FF seems like the pretty clear choice here. I'm actually a little surprised the voting is so even.
I think FF is the better choice, unless you really want to do funds work. FF has a top notch corporate practice in NYC that is not properly reflected in its Vault ranking. Additionally, they have consistently given 100% offers.
OK cool I didn't find offer rates. Schulte is high but they no offered someone last year

Anonymous User
Posts: 432828
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:06 pm

Bump for new offer.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432828
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:11 pm

Fried Frank probably gives you the best overall transactional practice. Schulte for funds work. Would probably take both over dechert, don't know much about them.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Anonymous User
Posts: 432828
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Sep 12, 2014 9:52 pm

bump

Anonymous User
Posts: 432828
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Sep 13, 2014 11:17 am

If you want a shot at doing developer-side real estate work, FF is the only one of these firms that does that. SRZ and Dechert are both on the financing/securitization side.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432828
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Sep 13, 2014 11:30 am

Anonymous User wrote:If you want a shot at doing developer-side real estate work, FF is the only one of these firms that does that. SRZ and Dechert are both on the financing/securitization side.
I'm probably leaning more toward transactional stuff, but I really like that FF works a lot with GS. Other main considerations are lateral opportunities and job security/offer rates.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432828
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Sep 14, 2014 10:56 am

I had the exact same offers as you OP and chose FF. My rationale was aligned with what a couple of the posters here have said and seems to be what you are thinking as well - I am interested in transactional generally but can't say what exactly. I think FF is more well-regarded in a breadth of corp transactional practice areas whereas Schulte is almost exclusively funds. Also think FF has better rep in NY than it might seem like for exit opps.

I was concerned about the partner defections though. Hopefully with new head of the firm things will start trending in a better direction.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Mal Reynolds

Diamond
Posts: 12612
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Mal Reynolds » Sun Sep 14, 2014 11:02 am

If you're not operating at the top of the funds game then you might as well go to med school.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432828
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Sep 14, 2014 11:24 am

Mal Reynolds wrote:If you're not operating at the top of the funds game then you might as well go to med school.
what?
Anonymous User wrote:I had the exact same offers as you OP and chose FF. My rationale was aligned with what a couple of the posters here have said and seems to be what you are thinking as well - I am interested in transactional generally but can't say what exactly. I think FF is more well-regarded in a breadth of corp transactional practice areas whereas Schulte is almost exclusively funds. Also think FF has better rep in NY than it might seem like for exit opps.

I was concerned about the partner defections though. Hopefully with new head of the firm things will start trending in a better direction.
Thanks, it sounds like you and I have similar interests/concerns. I was also worried about the whole Greenwald/Jacob changeover. Are you a 2L or are you already at the firm?

Anonymous User
Posts: 432828
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Sep 14, 2014 11:36 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I had the exact same offers as you OP and chose FF. My rationale was aligned with what a couple of the posters here have said and seems to be what you are thinking as well - I am interested in transactional generally but can't say what exactly. I think FF is more well-regarded in a breadth of corp transactional practice areas whereas Schulte is almost exclusively funds. Also think FF has better rep in NY than it might seem like for exit opps.

I was concerned about the partner defections though. Hopefully with new head of the firm things will start trending in a better direction.
Thanks, it sounds like you and I have similar interests/concerns. I was also worried about the whole Greenwald/Jacob changeover. Are you a 2L or are you already at the firm?
I'm a 2L. Just accepted my offer this week.

User avatar
FKASunny

Gold
Posts: 3904
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:40 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by FKASunny » Sun Sep 14, 2014 11:42 am

You'd be a fool not to accept the Schulte offer

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anonymous User
Posts: 432828
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Sep 14, 2014 11:57 am

FKASunny wrote:You'd be a fool not to accept the Schulte offer
Is this just srz trolling or do you have real reasons?

Mal Reynolds

Diamond
Posts: 12612
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Mal Reynolds » Sun Sep 14, 2014 12:07 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
FKASunny wrote:You'd be a fool not to accept the Schulte offer
Is this just srz trolling or do you have real reasons?
DROVES of FUNDS

Anonymous User
Posts: 432828
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Sep 14, 2014 5:23 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
FKASunny wrote:You'd be a fool not to accept the Schulte offer
Is this just srz trolling or do you have real reasons?

Mal Reynolds

Diamond
Posts: 12612
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Mal Reynolds » Sun Sep 14, 2014 5:24 pm

Mal Reynolds wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
FKASunny wrote:You'd be a fool not to accept the Schulte offer
Is this just srz trolling or do you have real reasons?
DROVES of FUNDS

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432828
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Sep 14, 2014 9:00 pm

I hate that you got offers at the only NY firms I had cbs with and was rejected from. but go with Fried Frank.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432828
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by Anonymous User » Sun Sep 14, 2014 9:47 pm

Mal Reynolds wrote:
Mal Reynolds wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
FKASunny wrote:You'd be a fool not to accept the Schulte offer
Is this just srz trolling or do you have real reasons?
DROVES of FUNDS
to be clear, second anon was not me (OP) :lol:

hephaestus

Gold
Posts: 2399
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by hephaestus » Sun Sep 14, 2014 9:56 pm

Anonymous User wrote: Eta: dechert offer.
I don't think Dechert changes this equation at all, and I would still stick to FF.

mvp99

Silver
Posts: 1474
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:00 pm

Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert

Post by mvp99 » Sun Sep 14, 2014 10:07 pm

Obvissssss Schulte

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”