Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432828
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert
Hey guys. I'm still waiting on some places to trickle in, but for now I'm making a choice between FF and SRZ. I'm interested in transactional work generally but beyond that, not sure (maybe M&A, Real Estate, or Tax - it seemed like the firms are strong in the same areas but that FF is better in all except investment fund stuff). FF seemed a bit "stiff" but other than that I had pretty similar impressions of the cultures on net, though FF seemed a little more laid back. I'm mostly looking for best quality of experience/exit opps. I have one concern in that over the past year or so, I've heard some instability rumors regarding FF, so if true, that's a concern (I'm going to talk to CSO and try to get in touch with FF alums of my school to determine whether it's true).
Eta: dechert offer.
Eta: dechert offer.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Fri Sep 12, 2014 9:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
Swimp

- Posts: 493
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 9:32 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank
Do you have a strong interest in hedge fund work? If not, FF seems like the pretty clear choice here. I'm actually a little surprised the voting is so even.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432828
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank
bump. Rationale behind the SRZ votes?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432828
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank
Also, and I don't mean to come off as entitled, but should I do my scheduled callbacks at Dechert and McDermott NY? I'm not really sure where those two fall on the spectrum.
-
Swimp

- Posts: 493
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 9:32 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank
It wouldn't be crazy to take either of those places over FF or SRZ. I'd do the callbacks.Anonymous User wrote:Also, and I don't mean to come off as entitled, but should I do my scheduled callbacks at Dechert and McDermott NY? I'm not really sure where those two fall on the spectrum.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
hephaestus

- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank
I think FF is the better choice, unless you really want to do funds work. FF has a top notch corporate practice in NYC that is not properly reflected in its Vault ranking. Additionally, they have consistently given 100% offers.Swimp wrote:Do you have a strong interest in hedge fund work? If not, FF seems like the pretty clear choice here. I'm actually a little surprised the voting is so even.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432828
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank
OK cool I didn't find offer rates. Schulte is high but they no offered someone last yearImNoScar wrote:I think FF is the better choice, unless you really want to do funds work. FF has a top notch corporate practice in NYC that is not properly reflected in its Vault ranking. Additionally, they have consistently given 100% offers.Swimp wrote:Do you have a strong interest in hedge fund work? If not, FF seems like the pretty clear choice here. I'm actually a little surprised the voting is so even.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432828
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v Dechert
Bump for new offer.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432828
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank
Fried Frank probably gives you the best overall transactional practice. Schulte for funds work. Would probably take both over dechert, don't know much about them.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432828
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432828
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert
If you want a shot at doing developer-side real estate work, FF is the only one of these firms that does that. SRZ and Dechert are both on the financing/securitization side.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432828
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert
I'm probably leaning more toward transactional stuff, but I really like that FF works a lot with GS. Other main considerations are lateral opportunities and job security/offer rates.Anonymous User wrote:If you want a shot at doing developer-side real estate work, FF is the only one of these firms that does that. SRZ and Dechert are both on the financing/securitization side.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432828
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert
I had the exact same offers as you OP and chose FF. My rationale was aligned with what a couple of the posters here have said and seems to be what you are thinking as well - I am interested in transactional generally but can't say what exactly. I think FF is more well-regarded in a breadth of corp transactional practice areas whereas Schulte is almost exclusively funds. Also think FF has better rep in NY than it might seem like for exit opps.
I was concerned about the partner defections though. Hopefully with new head of the firm things will start trending in a better direction.
I was concerned about the partner defections though. Hopefully with new head of the firm things will start trending in a better direction.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Mal Reynolds

- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert
If you're not operating at the top of the funds game then you might as well go to med school.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432828
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert
what?Mal Reynolds wrote:If you're not operating at the top of the funds game then you might as well go to med school.
Thanks, it sounds like you and I have similar interests/concerns. I was also worried about the whole Greenwald/Jacob changeover. Are you a 2L or are you already at the firm?Anonymous User wrote:I had the exact same offers as you OP and chose FF. My rationale was aligned with what a couple of the posters here have said and seems to be what you are thinking as well - I am interested in transactional generally but can't say what exactly. I think FF is more well-regarded in a breadth of corp transactional practice areas whereas Schulte is almost exclusively funds. Also think FF has better rep in NY than it might seem like for exit opps.
I was concerned about the partner defections though. Hopefully with new head of the firm things will start trending in a better direction.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432828
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert
I'm a 2L. Just accepted my offer this week.Anonymous User wrote:Thanks, it sounds like you and I have similar interests/concerns. I was also worried about the whole Greenwald/Jacob changeover. Are you a 2L or are you already at the firm?Anonymous User wrote:I had the exact same offers as you OP and chose FF. My rationale was aligned with what a couple of the posters here have said and seems to be what you are thinking as well - I am interested in transactional generally but can't say what exactly. I think FF is more well-regarded in a breadth of corp transactional practice areas whereas Schulte is almost exclusively funds. Also think FF has better rep in NY than it might seem like for exit opps.
I was concerned about the partner defections though. Hopefully with new head of the firm things will start trending in a better direction.
- FKASunny

- Posts: 3904
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:40 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert
You'd be a fool not to accept the Schulte offer
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432828
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert
Is this just srz trolling or do you have real reasons?FKASunny wrote:You'd be a fool not to accept the Schulte offer
-
Mal Reynolds

- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert
DROVES of FUNDSAnonymous User wrote:Is this just srz trolling or do you have real reasons?FKASunny wrote:You'd be a fool not to accept the Schulte offer
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432828
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert
Anonymous User wrote:Is this just srz trolling or do you have real reasons?FKASunny wrote:You'd be a fool not to accept the Schulte offer
-
Mal Reynolds

- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert
Mal Reynolds wrote:DROVES of FUNDSAnonymous User wrote:Is this just srz trolling or do you have real reasons?FKASunny wrote:You'd be a fool not to accept the Schulte offer
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432828
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert
I hate that you got offers at the only NY firms I had cbs with and was rejected from. but go with Fried Frank.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432828
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert
to be clear, second anon was not me (OP)Mal Reynolds wrote:Mal Reynolds wrote:DROVES of FUNDSAnonymous User wrote:Is this just srz trolling or do you have real reasons?FKASunny wrote:You'd be a fool not to accept the Schulte offer
-
hephaestus

- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert
I don't think Dechert changes this equation at all, and I would still stick to FF.Anonymous User wrote: Eta: dechert offer.
-
mvp99

- Posts: 1474
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:00 pm
Re: Schulte v. Fried Frank v. Dechert
Obvissssss Schulte
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login